Posted on 05/11/2006 10:18:46 PM PDT by paulat
Been there. Pretty cool.
If only...LOL!
We'll be lookin' fer ya!
Too late. :-(
my wife and i did our 5th anniversary in Roslyn...
We stayed in the B&B above Village Pizza on the main drag...
could see the Brick out our window...
what amazing memories that weekend...
we met the owner of the gift shop next to the Radio Station...while looking in the windows of the KBHR studio..
He let us in and my wife and i were able to sit behind Minifields desk...hold that fish that was on the wall...sit at Chris Stevens radio booth stool..what ...a...blast!!
even got some sweet pictures..
amazing country up there...
ps.
Love is grand.
And of course a Texican. God bless Texas.
I met Janine Turner at a convention last year where she was a celebrity spokesperson for Restasis as I recall. She looked pretty good. Not just makeup and camera angles.
i am lucky. and every day, about four or five hours after i awaken, i remind myself of that. in the meantime, i tell myself (and you) that my wife has a twin sister who is a fat, methamphetamine addict who is currently wearing a thingie around her ankle that costs me money. actually, i am very fond of my sister-in-law. not quite sure why. maybe it's because she loves my precious baby daughter, and my daughter loves her. to pieces. we all fight and bicker (sp?), but my daughter loves her and vice versa ... and i am nothing. praise Jesus.
Of course, Exposure was more lighthearted than Peaks (heck, what wasn't?), but IMHO tried to capitalize on the "quirky" trend that Peaks began. Initially intrigued, I tired of Peaks' darkness, tawdriness, and meandering, meaningless plot divergences. When the backwards-talking dancing dwarf made his first appearance, I knew Peaks was doomed.
What annoyed me about both Peaks and Exposure was that both seemed to delight in presenting ostensibly "normal" people and making them out to be secret (or not so secret) freaks, forcing the question, "Who's really 'normal'?" But while Peaks just wallowed in weirdness, there were unmistakable political overtones present in Exposure.
I used to check out Exposure when there was a stinker of a game on Monday Night Football (which began at 6PM Pacific Time). But NE lost me as a casual viewer once and for all on May 18, 1992, when an episode aired explaining the origin of the town of Cicely. The synopsis, from a fan site:
Roslyn was felled by the bullet fired, and at her funeral, attended by the whole town, Cicely made this statement:
While driving, Joel narrowly misses hitting an elderly man who he discovers is one of Cicely's first residents. In an ensuing conversation Ned (guest star Roberts Blossom) launches into an elaborate story about the creation of the town. As he speaks his words come to life on the screen. The downtrodden town was run by Mace (Barry Corbin), an outlaw who controlled the inhabi tants with an iron fist. It was when Mace left for a few months that Roslyn (guest star Jo Anderson), a powerful, robust [lesbian] woman, and [her lover] Cicely (guest star Yvonne Suhor), a vision of grace and beauty, came to the village. Immediately Roslyn made an effort to clean up the town. She stood up for her beliefs and demanded civil and mannerly behavior. Roslyn took Ned (Darren E. Burrows), who was then a young man who lived like an animal and begged for food, and Sally (Cynthia Geary), a shamed hooker, under her wing and instilled in them a new sense of self esteem.Together Roslyn and Cicely brought culture, peace, and open mindedness to the small community. The once primitive town came to appreciate such things as dance and poetry. Roslyn had created a place where everyone was accepted without prejudice. Franz Kafka (Rob Morrow) even visited the artist's utopia to alleviate his writer's block. News that Mace was headed back to reclaim his town would jeopardize the now perfect society. Upon his entrance to town, Roslyn attempted to talk with him calmly on behalf of the townspeople. As she spoke with him, one of his gunmen fired. After that day, the town and Roslyn were never the same.
The plot synopsis makes the show seem more innocuous then was the more-radical final product. In an early scene, Roslyn walks into a typical wild west saloon and starts singing. When a rowdy drunk starts harassing and threatening her, she coldcocks him, lays him out, and asks the other men in the joint to sing with her. Stunned and shaking with fear, they all comply. This is the beginning of Cicely's Camelotish moment as "Paris of the West," or, as the fan wrote on her site, "the now perfect society."
Cicely: In this tiny corner of Alaska, the human spirit has triumphed. We hold in our hands, the most precious gift of all: Freedom. The freedom to express our art. Our love. The freedom to be who we want to be. We are not going to give that freedom away and no one shall take it from us!
But wait! There's more. The fan site also notes that in the Northern Exposure Production Bible -- which seems to be a reference guide for screenwriters regarding the show's concept, characters, and history -- there is this little note about the "Cicely" episode: "Roslyn & Cicely's salon opened May 1st: important holiday in matriarchal pagan societies."
So why would I ever have subjected myself to this looney liberal show? Two words: Janine Turner. But I know better now; Helen of Troy couldn't lure me to a show like, for example, Will & Grace.
bttt
Either way, the spirit of the episode is the same. Being a lifelong San Franciscan, I recognize the sentiment.
"ps. Love is grand."
When you have it, but not when it's ripped away. Some of us never recover from that loss. :-(
Say WA? Evergreen State ping
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this ping list.
Ping sionnsar if you see a Washington state related thread.
Little slice of local lore fer ya... :-)
Now, I don't suppose that this couple's dream of retirement in owning this famous little bar was crushed by the recent anti-smoking law. Naw. Couldn't be.
hehehe...naw. Not in a million years.
Sorry, hon. I can't afford to buy it for ya. ;-)
Well, I'm a little confused by the price. The article says 4.2M and the web site says I think 1.7M... both of which strike me as a little high.
I'll give 'em a dollar.
A bar that doesn't allow smoking ain't even worth that much. ;-)
4 Million for that Joint Good Luck, That's just not going to happen......
I'd want to see the books.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.