Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nebraska Governor Deflects Osborn Challenge (Pro-Illegals Lost!)
Boston Globe ^ | May 10, 2006 | Scott Bauer

Posted on 05/14/2006 1:29:30 PM PDT by LS

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Blake#1

Trust is the wrong word to use.

Distrust is the appropriate word. On THIS issue I distrust and have no faith in either party. The person I addressed seemed to be of opinion the approach would differ on THIS issue were the Democrats in power so we should accept the administration's approach. It wouldn't. It might be a bit more open with its stated intent, but the practice would be the same.

On foreign policy, yes, there is a differential in how a Republican administration acts vs a Democrat administration. This isn't a point I've ever disputed.


21 posted on 05/14/2006 2:46:58 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (Self Admitted BorderBot: Be Heard: Send a Brick: http://www.send-a-brick.com/brick.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kcar

I need that bumpersticker!


22 posted on 05/14/2006 2:56:36 PM PDT by JRochelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
"Americans are very angry that the demands of Mexican citizens are taking precedence over the rights of American citizens, and that we're being forced to pay the bills for them."

And angry with every reminder of that fact...like not being able to go to the local Walmart in middle America without having to endure the offensive, incoherent, and too loud babbling in Mexican Spanish from these illegal interlopers. Like having to suffer every product label being printed in Spanish or having to endure a Spanish version on the other end of every phone call that connects with automated answering.

23 posted on 05/14/2006 3:11:46 PM PDT by sweetliberty (Stupidity should make you sterile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
I believe that your position (let's call it the HERNDON POSITION) requires that a wall be built along the Mexican, Canadian, Alaskan, borders. It also requires a similar wall be built around American Samoa, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and any place I may have left out. These walls will result in a lesser trade volumn for USofA industries. Jobs will be created beyond the walls and USofA foreign trade will practically dry-up.
24 posted on 05/14/2006 3:12:49 PM PDT by Blake#1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LS
Also, several cities/counties are considering erecting tent-cities to serve as detainment facilities.

The complaint/excuse from many has been that they didn't have jail space to detail. The Sheriff of Maricopa County 'showed them the light'. Now, several other cities/counties are considering tent city detainment facilities as a temporary solution.

This just proves that WE can do something about the problem, when we have LEADERSHIP who are willing to act. If Washington politicians won't lead and if the governors won't lead, local politicians/people WILL.
25 posted on 05/14/2006 3:27:52 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blake#1

A theory I have no reason to believe on the basis of your say so.

However, my position is to build a wall. I do thank you for noting my intent isn't only to focus on Mexico. IMO, too many directly focus solely there just because that is where the greatest number enter.

On this you are correct.

The reason being it's a permanent barrier a politician safely re-lected or a new administration cannot easily dismantle. It's not the only thing that must be done, disincentives must be applied from within but it's a concrete barrier that will slow traffic at least.

If our government had earned trust on the matter, I would be more lenient and might even accept "virtual" fences or just more troops on the border or more border guards.

The heart of the matter is that I don't trust them on this. neither do many, that's why insistence on the wall.


26 posted on 05/14/2006 3:29:59 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (Self Admitted BorderBot: Be Heard: Send a Brick: http://www.send-a-brick.com/brick.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Osborne supported the idea.


Pretty bone-headed, if you ask me.


Osborne is now re-thinking his position. LOL

[Many politicians better start paying attention, or the 'jobs Americans won't do' will be their jobs and they will be replaced. Maybe the grassroots have had enough and are starting to show some political muscle. Let's hope it doesn't stop until half of those in Washington get permanent retirement, sooner rather than later.]
27 posted on 05/14/2006 3:31:21 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LS
Rep. Tom Osborne, the hero football coach once called "Nebraska's God."

Tom Osborne was a "god" only to a handful of morons who consider football important. He was a do-nothing congressman, and the voters wisely rejected him as a gubernatorial candidate.

Tom Osborne is what comes from electing names instead of people.

28 posted on 05/14/2006 3:33:40 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
Osborne, in his three congressional elections, had never failed to
capture less than 82 percent of the vote in his district.
A previous congressional opponent had once called Osborne "Nebraska's God."


And that's no lie.
I give credit to The Boston Globe for this coverage.
And can tell you this story has been BURIED here in Big 12 country.
I grew up in Oklahoma (when it was Switzer-Land) and and have relatives
in Missouri.
I checked with my family and NOT A WORD about this in the news.
Which is what you'd expect given Osborne's god-like status in
even other states with schools that were in the Big 8 conference.
29 posted on 05/14/2006 3:34:35 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty

Please press 1 to have your rant re-read in English.

Please press 2 to have your rant re-read in Spanish.

Please press 3 to have your rant re-read by a customer service agent [in India]

If you have reached this message in error, please hang up and dial again.



lol


30 posted on 05/14/2006 3:34:59 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LS
Chuckie Hagel's comments

The gubernatorial primary should send a message to upChuck that his days are numbered. The crowd that energetically stayed away from Osborne is the same crowd that will send Hagel packing in '08.

31 posted on 05/14/2006 3:35:41 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LS
Republican Attorney General Jon Bruning, who supported Osborne, said
the congressman's more nuanced position "really wasn't helpful."


In other words, Osburne wasn't artful enough at hiding his true
mission: close down smaller school districts...so there'd be enough
money to give ILLEGALS in-state tuition at universities and colleges.

(N.B.: I'm not sure if the consolidation plan was/wasn't a winner.
But Osborne had his eye on taking money from legal students...
to give it to ILLEGALS.)
32 posted on 05/14/2006 3:56:03 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

But since school districts and hospitals are about the only source of solid middle class jobs in the rural areas then the idea of consolidating them is political suicide. Any politician who even whispers support for the idea is toast.


What does that say about the morals of Kansas voters ? (if what you are saying is true)


33 posted on 05/14/2006 3:59:50 PM PDT by newfarm4000n (God Bless America and God Bless Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
Heineman vetoed a bill that would have allowed qualified children
of illegal immigrants to pay in-state tuition at the University of
Nebraska. He also vetoed a measure that dissolved the state’s smallest
school districts; those offering elementary school education in
mostly rural areas.
Both vetoes were overridden...


While the date of the over-rides are unclear...and may be blunted thanks
due to time (I think Nebraska has one of those meet-every-other-year
legislatures?)...
but there should be some Nebraska state legislators saying "uh-oh"
when they saw Osborne The G-d defeated like this over those issues.
34 posted on 05/14/2006 4:02:02 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: newfarm4000n
What does that say about the morals of Kansas voters ? (if what you are saying is true)

What do morals have to do with it? Both political parties consider tax dollars nothing more than something to help promote their reelection. What's right or efficient or what's best for the tax payers isn't the issue. Retaining office is.

There are some Kansas school districts being subsidized to the tune of $2500 per student, those are the larger ones. Some of the rural ones are being subsidized to the tune of $12,000 per student.

35 posted on 05/14/2006 4:05:29 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: LS

"Osborne supported the idea." then I'm damned glad he lost!


36 posted on 05/14/2006 4:06:56 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (John Spencer: Fighting to save America from Hilllary Clinton..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

There are some Kansas school districts being subsidized to the tune of $2500 per student, those are the larger ones. Some of the rural ones are being subsidized to the tune of $12,000 per student.

And I thought Kansans were mainly conservative. It just shows that even conservatives want governments only to cut spending on other people.


37 posted on 05/14/2006 4:25:06 PM PDT by newfarm4000n (God Bless America and God Bless Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

If they don't start listening it will be the end of America as we know, we will no longer count, we will be overwhelmed by the mexicans. Our votes will end up like voting for Perot. Those that want drugs legalized want have to go elsewhere we will have it sold door to door!!!


38 posted on 05/14/2006 4:26:00 PM PDT by catmanblack. (he is the great I AM-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LS

bump for publicity


39 posted on 05/14/2006 4:59:33 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blake#1
You are completely missing the point: the fact that these guys are losing in PRIMARIES to OTHER REPUBLICANS who are NOT open borders says that the Dems have no chance with their pro-illegal views.

Now, if it's someone like DeWine, no, I'm not going to vote for him as things now stand. But he won't need my vote to get re-elected and do his damage.

40 posted on 05/14/2006 5:00:17 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson