Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP NewsBreak: Guard Stint to Last 2 Years (at least two years with no clear end date)
The AP via Yahoo! News ^ | May 19, 2006 | Aaron C. Davis

Posted on 05/19/2006 7:50:15 PM PDT by new yorker 77

President Bush's planned deployment of National Guard troops to the Mexican border would last at least two years with no clear end date, according to a Pentagon memo obtained Friday by The Associated Press.

The one-page "initial guidance" memo to National Guard leaders in border states does not address the estimated cost of the mission or when soldiers would be deployed. But high-ranking officials in the California National Guard said they were told Friday that deployments would not begin before early June.

While the military document makes clear the troops would remain under the command of their governors, it also indicates a high degree of federal control over operations. It states that the National Guard Bureau's Army and Air Directories "will serve as the states' focal points for force-planning, training, organizing and equipping their forces."

Guardsmen in "all other states, territories and the District of Columbia" will serve a supportive role, according to the memo.

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has not yet decided whether to commit troops to the mission, led a conference call with the governors of Arizona, New Mexico and Texas to discuss the memo.

"There still remains a lot of unanswered questions that the governor is concerned about," Adam Mandelsohn, Schwarzenegger's communications director. "Most specifically, the outstanding funding issues and whether there is a commitment to the two-year time frame," he said.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano said they would support the deployment of National Guard troops to the border, while New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, a Democrat, has been more critical of the plan.

A spokeswoman for Perry said the governors agreed to send a letter asking the Bush administration to clarify issues such as funding, rotation and troop levels that would be stationed in each of the states.

The president outlined the plan Monday night as part of a national address on curbing illegal immigration, pledging to gain control of the border and give up to 12 million illegal immigrants a chance at citizenship.

He proposed deploying 6,000 troops at a time to the border in two-week rotations. The deployments would be temporary, he said, until enough Border Patrol agents were hired to secure the mission. He asked Congress to add 6,000 more Border Patrol agents by the end of his presidency.

The White House also said the troops would be financed with part of the $1.9 billion requested from Congress this year to supplement border enforcement.

The memo sent Friday to Guard leaders went further, stating that units would remain in a "federally funded" mission for "up to one year, with a force reduction to 3,000 during the second year."

The document described an "end date" for the mission when the U.S. Border Patrol operation "gains independent operational control of the (southwest border) and National Guard forces are no longer required for this mission."

The memo said the Guard units' missions will focus on "surveillance, reconnaissance, aviation, intelligence, engineering, training, vehicle dismantling, linguistics ... transportation and logistics."

They will not be asked to perform law-enforcement functions, but rather provide "vetted and pre-coordinated support to law enforcement."

___

Associated Press Writers Paul Davenport in Phoenix and Sheila Flynn in Dallas contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.

Copyright © 2006 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: California; US: New Mexico; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: assocpressstinks; homebychristmas; nationalguard; southernborder; twowholeyears
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
To: KoRn

'sides, the only president that hired folks (or at least Inter-Viewed) in the oral (sorry Oval) office was Bill Clinton, me thinks that the house passed extra border folks and the senate (thanks to Hillary etal) vetoed it, am I wrong?


61 posted on 05/19/2006 9:57:14 PM PDT by Foolsgold (dumped daschel he he he he)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, a Democrat, has been more critical of the plan.

Didn't she call up the National Guard to protect the border a few months ago?

62 posted on 05/19/2006 10:05:09 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Takes awhile to turn a battleship, equally long to turn it again.


63 posted on 05/19/2006 10:06:40 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
How will this work, exactly? National Guards will patrol the border. If a wetback makes a run for it what do they do? Tackle them? Shoot them in the leg? What is permitted?

Has Vincente been yelling and screaming yet?
64 posted on 05/19/2006 10:14:41 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Let's hope no Mexicans get Pantied!

Pray for W and Our Troops


65 posted on 05/19/2006 10:21:23 PM PDT by bray (The only thing lower than Bush' numbers are the press')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
The one-page "initial guidance" memo...

I wonder, though, why the deployment was announced before the details were in place.

66 posted on 05/19/2006 10:43:10 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (God Bless Our Troops...including U.S. Border Patrol, America's First Line of Defense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

Dammmit! 3rd person to think Quagmire!


67 posted on 05/19/2006 10:48:57 PM PDT by SFC Chromey (We are at war with Islamofascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

I say we Courts Martial the General that leaked the details of the classified memo.


68 posted on 05/19/2006 11:06:12 PM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Too little; Too late; Way too few.


69 posted on 05/19/2006 11:18:27 PM PDT by de Buillion (The USA needs a CONSERVATIVE political party NOW! (republicans don't qualify))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Jim.

It's good to see you posting on a immigration thread.

70 posted on 05/19/2006 11:19:59 PM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

I've heard the best strategy in handling the illegal immigrant problem is to allow all the Mexican immigrants into the country with the proviso they join the military. Then invade Mexico with the newly formed Mexican Brigade. Since we never formulate successful exit strategies, they'll remain in Mexico from then on out.


71 posted on 05/19/2006 11:24:09 PM PDT by Cvengr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #72 Removed by Moderator

Comment #73 Removed by Moderator

To: new yorker 77

ping


74 posted on 05/20/2006 12:05:24 AM PDT by AnimalLover ( ((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
"New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, a Democrat, has been more critical of the plan. Didn't she call up the National Guard to protect the border a few months ago? "

I really believe that New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson is a "he". DUH!

75 posted on 05/20/2006 12:09:20 AM PDT by de Buillion (The USA needs a CONSERVATIVE political party NOW! (republicans don't qualify))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

There's no pleasing them. They're just like the Libs. There is no success or compromise, just moving the goalpost.

Whiners.


76 posted on 05/20/2006 12:51:28 AM PDT by JennysCool ("I simply do not remember getting out of bed.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
I think that symbolically this is very good. It may be the beginning to the turn of the tide of illegal immigration, which needs to be reversed before it becomes truly destructive to our nation.

I am saddened that this issue has come to such a boiling point that such actions, posturing, words for consumption etc. are needed, but that is where we are.

More to you later on this topic and why I think that.

Regards

Wolf
77 posted on 05/20/2006 1:08:51 AM PDT by RunningWolf (Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
LOL!

Thanks for the grin. :)

78 posted on 05/20/2006 2:39:00 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Kowtowing to the Bush haters ends now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: unfortunately a bluestater

Just a thought, but is it possible the administration, in concert with House and Senate Republicans, faded leftward on this issue knowing full well the Dems would go overboard trying to one-up them? We now have democrats on record as saying "English language is discrimination" and voting against the Official Language ammendment. Wouldn't that be a classic Rovian maneuver? Look what's happened, we've now, albeit gradually, begun proposing language standards, fence building, National Guard mobilization, etc...while the Dems are getting sillier and sillier with trying to appease the invasion forces

Seems farfetched that Repubs could be that well coordinated, disciplined and Machiavellian...but who knows


79 posted on 05/20/2006 4:20:19 AM PDT by wally-balls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

I was going to ask a similar question, but I wonder if it was the Pentagon. Someone surely picked up the phone, though, didn't they. I hope the media is all wire-tapped.


80 posted on 05/20/2006 4:56:16 AM PDT by freema (Proud Marine FRiend, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson