Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

Within the past hour, a terrorist organization, known to have acquired several nuclear weapons, has been observed by a U.S. imaging system loading the weapons onto vehicles and preparing to leave for an unknown destination.

a preventive nuclear strike.....
- the consequences of an unprecedented action of this kind might well be regarded as unacceptable -- in terms of the risk to innocent lives, of environmental damage and of the expected political repercussions around the world.



Wait a minute. THEY have nukes but we can't use our nukes because of the " risk to innocent lives, of environmental damage and of the expected political repercussions around the world".

Whew, thank God we didn't have that type of spineless mindset in 1945.


5 posted on 05/22/2006 10:12:44 PM PDT by TomasUSMC ((FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TomasUSMC
Wait a minute. THEY have nukes but we can't use our nukes because of the " risk to innocent lives, of environmental damage and of the expected political repercussions around the world".

Whew, thank God we didn't have that type of spineless mindset in 1945.

I wouldn't call it spineless, no matter what you think. Using a nuke is a political act with many unforseeable consequences. Say the area we are going to hit is close to the Chinese/Russian border. Niether one of these countries is going to think it is 'ok' for fallout to spread across their lands. They may also take an inbound ICBM and a preemptive strike and reply rather quickly without any explaination.

Fortunately for those of us who think of these things we don't have someone with an attitude like yours with a finger on the button.

It would be better to take the nukes out without a corresponding nuke attack, better to take them intact to see where the materials came from, and then most of the peacable governments, which we are one, will have the inducement to punish the suppliers.

13 posted on 05/22/2006 11:13:57 PM PDT by Pistolshot (Condi 2008.<------added January 2004. Remember you heard it here first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: TomasUSMC

"Within the past hour, a terrorist organization, known to have acquired several nuclear weapons, has been observed by a U.S. imaging system loading the weapons onto vehicles and preparing to leave for an unknown destination. A delay of even an hour or two in launching a U.S. strike on that location could mean the group would depart, contact might be lost, and the weapons would be smuggled into the United States or an allied nation and detonated. "

Let's change that a little bit and see how it would play.

Within the past hour, the leader of a terrorist organization, known to have caused several hundred deaths has been observed by a U.S. imaging system. A delay of even an hour or two in launching a U.S. strike on that location could mean the group would depart, contact might be lost, and the leader would be free to plan and execute another strike against the United States or an allied nations.

Now let's go back to the Clinton era and Osama. Clinton had a chance to kill Osama but relied on his attorneys to hold off until Osama left the area then fired missiles. Then he told the Times and Compost that they almost had him.


22 posted on 05/23/2006 8:42:38 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Democrats = The Culture of Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson