Posted on 05/23/2006 12:09:10 PM PDT by monkapotamus
Wrong About Rove?
By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, May 23, 2006; 7:54 AM
I reported yesterday (and if you missed it, start paying attention!) that the liberal Web site Truthout.org was standing by its claim that Karl Rove had been secretly indicted in the CIA leak case, despite strong denials by the White House aide's lawyer and spokesman.
Why the Rove team would lie about information that, if true, was certain to come out soon was never quite clear. More than three dozen mainstream journalists checked on the Truthout report but could not confirm a word of it.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Hey Howard...
psssst...
R-U-S-S-E-R-T
When do lunatic libs stop lying?
What a bunch of nonsense! Who gives a crap who outed Plame anyway? Sheesh!
"When do lunatic libs stop lying?"
When the money dries up.
She was never "in" so how could she be outed.
Drudge was making fun of this two Sundays ago. And last Sunday when the indictment didn't happen last week as it was supposed to according to the leftist blogs.
Whatever. It's certainly no basis for the scandal that liberal American politicos want to make of it!
Michigan Lawyers and Politicians Applaud Report of Rove Indictment
A gathering of lawyers in Michigan, with Democratic Governor Jennifer Granholm and Senator Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) in attendance, erupted in a standing ovation when it was announced that Karl Rove had been indicted. "This is sweet," Clinton was overheard commenting to Granholm. "I was afraid they were going to announce bin Laden had been captured. That would've been bad news."
It turned out the announcement was incorrect. Rove has not been indicted. The consensus opinion at the Democratic National Committee is that Rove somehow engineered the announcement to raise false hope that could later be crushed by the truth. "It's just one dirty trick after another from those guys," Howard Dean fumed. "They all ought to be in jail. That's where they will be once we're in charge."
read more...
http://www.azconservative.org/Semmens1.htm
How's this for a riddle?
How do you tell when a Liberal is lying?
His lips move.
Boy that was way too easy.
Memo to Howard.
Got to Brit Hume's video on Fox News . com
The organization "apologized" simply for being too far ahead of the news.
Actually, Blather and Mapes are still lying inspite of the money dying up. They usually stop lying, when they stop breathing, unless they continue to vote after cessation of breathing.
When their lips stop moving?
"They usually stop lying, when they stop breathing, unless they continue to vote after cessation of breathing."
The voting then is executed by the illegal alien who assumed their identity.....
Hey Howie..while your pretending to be a "journalist", why dont you put a little gumshoe on the connections between,,
R-U-S-S-E-R-Ts
the
M-A-T-H-E-W-Ss
and their dinner guests.
Then perhaps you can debate on your show if such a cabal is unusual or should be examined further.
I guess time will tell....
"The organization "apologized" simply for being too far ahead of the news.""
My take -
`Fake, but accurate. Eventually.'
Please clearly label any of your self-serving posts as satire. I find it reprehensible that one would deliberately try to muddy the waters on FR by posting what "appears" to be genuine quotes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.