Posted on 06/01/2006 7:23:15 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
Time for FReepers to let the baby-killers know how we feel!!!
Thoughts taken to heart, thank you.
But I think I'll focus on my baby killing country first.
Then I'll worry about a foreign country.
I hope one letter won't cause too much strain...
Anyone else want Hillarycare?
One letter? From a non-citizen?
Your heart is in the right place, as I alluded to before.
Thank you, but I'll concentrate on the killing spree of my country - FIRST.
Just curious, how many letters have you sent to the USA about the babies that they kill?
I've sent a lot. Many more to come.
Over the years, I've probably sent hundreds to US legislators.
I don't know if they had any effect, but I did get a photo of President Reagan once as a result. God rest his dear soul.
You are so right. Where can letters be sent?
This is almost as asinine as the Florida laws requiring seat belts be used in cars while allowing motorcycle riders to be helmetless.
Funny thing to me the riders most vocal about helmetless riding are generally the ones a nicely painted, full face helmet would do the most to improve their appearance.
How anyone can ride, be hit in the cheek a few times with Japanese Beetles, sprayed in the head with gravel from the road shoulder when a truck weaves ahead, catch a half pound of gnats in their teeth on an evening ride, etc and not WANT to wear a helmet is a sign of a severe mental defect.
Baby A ? I'll name this one "Angel"
The address is in the second last line of the article. God bless you!
I couldn't believe that either.
Suppressing the truth in all unrighteousness..
...professing themselves to be wise, they became fools...
having such an open mind, their brain fell out...
...and then there was none.
Funny thing to me the riders most vocal about helmetless riding are generally the ones a nicely painted, full face helmet would do the most to improve their appearance.
How anyone can ride, be hit in the cheek a few times with Japanese Beetles, sprayed in the head with gravel from the road shoulder when a truck weaves ahead, catch a half pound of gnats in their teeth on an evening ride, etc and not WANT to wear a helmet is a sign of a severe mental defect.
With all due respect to a fellow Freeper......
Who are you to sit in judgement?
You used the word "assinine" and the phrase, "severe mental defect", to describe those that choose not to wear a helmet.
I would use that same word and phrase to describe your outlook on the issue.
Again, who are you to pass judgement?
No, I do not ride a scooter. Used to, long time ago.
I am real curious now........
How do you feel about me owning a gun?
How do you feel about me owning and driving not one, but TWO - SUV's?
Your post has all the taste of the typical Liberal crap - "I don't like it, therefore it is wrong - what you, as an individual wants to do matters not."
I'm with LasVegasMac here.
I'd also like to add something.
Before we even get to all of LasVegasMac's valid points, it jumped out at me that you are drawing an equivalence between choosing not to wear a helmet with killing the weak because they are inconvenient.
This shows a very Liberal-unthink style of logic (that is to say, total lack thereof).
Read anything by Theordore Dalrymple at City-Journal.org
'Wow, governments can get away with a lot when they don't have a bill of rights to deal with.'
In Britain we do have a bill of rights - it is the one that your founding fathers used as the basis for your bill of rights.
http://www.bl.uk/treasures/magnacarta/magna.html
Somebody ought to tell the BBC, which specializes in broadcasting shocking footage from Iraq intended to cause distress and anxiety among the British public over the British troop deployments there, that these are now punishable offenses in once jolly olde England.
This is a very important point.
This really shows the agenda based bias of the media. War is hell, but serves the cause of liberty and freedom. Abortion kills lives for money and convenience.
Protest the war and you become a media hero. Protest abortion and you wind up in jail.
'This is a very important point.'
Simply not true. The BBC never shows shocking footage from Iraq as they are not allowed to show anything graphic. There is a great difference between a public news report that is subject to the broadcasting laws and individuals who take it on themselves to target people working within the law.
It doesn't matter how strongly you feel about an issue, Britain is a democracy and if you don't like a law, lobby to get it changed, don't mount personal campaigns against those currently working within the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.