Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK police hunt for "dirty" chemical bomb -papers
Reuters ^ | 6/03/05 | Michael Holden

Posted on 06/03/2006 8:23:00 AM PDT by Libloather

UK police hunt for "dirty" chemical bomb -papers
Sat Jun 3, 2006 02:39 PM BST
By Michael Holden

LONDON (Reuters) - British anti-terrorist police are hunting for a "dirty" chemical bomb that could be used in an attack in Britain after a major raid failed to uncover a device they believe exists, newspapers reported on Saturday.

More than 250 officers, some wearing chemical, biological and radiological protection suits, shot one man and arrested another during a dawn raid on an east London house on Friday.

Police made no official comment on the reports but said nothing suspicious had been found in an initial search of the property. They had also reassured the public in the surrounding area there was nothing to suggest they were at risk.

The operation, one of the biggest since last July's suicide bombings in the capital, was prompted by suspicions that the house could have been used for making bombs or chemical weapons.

"Because of the very specific nature of the intelligence, we planned an operation that was designed to mitigate any threat to the public either from firearms or from hazardous substances," said Peter Clarke, head of the UK's anti-terrorism branch.

Some newspapers, citing unnamed security sources, said police believed suspected militants had made a "dirty" chemical device -- a conventional bomb surrounded by toxic material that could be set off by a bomber wearing a suicide jacket.

"We are absolutely certain this device exists and could be used either by a suicide bomber or in a remote-controlled explosion," one source told the Sun newspaper.

POSSIBLE TARGETS

Newspapers quoted security chiefs who they said believed an attack was imminent, with possible targets including the underground train network or pubs crowded with fans watching the soccer World Cup tournament which starts next week.

"We're 100 percent certain that an attack was being planned. If we haven't stopped it, it could take place very soon," the Daily Mirror quoted a police source as saying.

The cordon thrown around the house was also much smaller than that used to guard a property used as a bomb-making factory by four British Islamists who carried out last July's attacks on London's transport system which killed 52 commuters.

Detectives said the latest operation was not linked to those attacks on three underground trains and a bus although the country has been on high alert since then.

London police Commissioner Ian Blair, Britain's top officer, has said three terrorism plots have been thwarted since the July bombings and groups were planning further attacks.

The 23-year-old man, shot at the house during the raid is now recovering in hospital. His injury is not said to be life-threatening and he has been arrested on suspicion of "the commission, preparation and instigation of acts of terrorism".

A second man was also arrested at the house under the Terrorism Act.

Neighbours said the family, who lived at the house in the ethnically-mixed Forest Gate area of London, were Bangladeshi and described them as friendly and "very religious".

In a statement released on Saturday, the family said they were shocked and angered by the police operation.

"We would like to make it clear that we are completely innocent and in no way involved in any terrorist activity," the statement said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bomb; chemical; chemicalweapons; dirty; dirtybomb; globaljihad; gwot; hunt; jihadineurope; papers; police; uk; ukmuslims

Police officers wearing protective clothing patrol Lansdown Road in east London, June 3, 2006. REUTERS/Alessia Pierdomenico
1 posted on 06/03/2006 8:23:01 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I thought the chemical/conventional bombs didn't work because the conventional explosive burns up the chemicals before they can disperse? Didn't something like that occur in the first WTC bombing?


2 posted on 06/03/2006 8:26:48 AM PDT by thoughtomator (A thread without a comment on immigration is not complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Good job, Brits!


3 posted on 06/03/2006 8:27:14 AM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

For a minute there I was worried. It's such a relief to hear the muzzie family declare their innocence.


4 posted on 06/03/2006 8:28:32 AM PDT by romanesq (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Called a "dirty" chemical bomb because it was handled by the filthy islamopukes?
5 posted on 06/03/2006 8:31:52 AM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Neighbours said the family, who lived at the house in the ethnically-mixed Forest Gate area of London, were Bangladeshi and described them as friendly and "very religious".

Methodists, I presume.
6 posted on 06/03/2006 8:45:08 AM PDT by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
No, in WTC I the bomb was a urea nitrate- nitrourea bomb, not ANFO. The FBI crime lab picked up the CN structure from the urea and assumed that there had been NaCN mixed into a "normal" ANFO device, and the NaCN had burned up. They spent quite a while "proving" the device was ANFO until they found urea, nitric, and sulfuric acid at the assembly site.

Which is not totally weird, the White House press office was telling us it was a "transformer fire" for the first 18-20 hours or so.
7 posted on 06/03/2006 8:53:10 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Wonder if this and that bust in Canada yesterday, was brought about by the nabbing of that top Al Qeda thug with his computers and stuff in Iraq last week.

Could this be

Bush's Fault

8 posted on 06/03/2006 8:56:33 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (I would rather be an Iraqi in a Hidatha guarded by Marines, then a subject of Al-Qeda anywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/special/9704b/7wtctr.htm


9 posted on 06/03/2006 8:56:48 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson