Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coleus
This is actually hilarious. The president is in political trouble and falls for this ludicrous attempt to impose federal control over an historical state responsibility. There is absolutely no threat to marriage in those states that limit it to a man and a woman; there is no threat to the Defense of Marriage Act which permits an exception to Article IV, but because some states may legalize marriage for nontraditional couples, we better stop that right now.

So now the radicals are weeping because the amendment doesn't completely outlaw homosexuality like most of them want.

Hilarious.

6 posted on 06/03/2006 4:41:18 PM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MACVSOG68

"So now the radicals are weeping because the amendment doesn't completely outlaw homosexuality like most of them want. "

Radicals?

Weeping?

The norm in society for marriage is between 1 man and 1 woman. If you propose changing that then you are the radical.

Marriage does a lot more than gain 1 person the health benefits of the other. It provides a basis on which the rest of our culture rests. Destroy marriage and you destroy the culture. But then I'm guessing you alrady knew that.

The one thing you radicals have in common is that its all about you. My rights, my wants, my desires....theres never any thought to what is good for our country.

Which is ironic as the liberals use "the good of the many" as a guideline to further so many other agendas.


7 posted on 06/03/2006 5:04:52 PM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: MACVSOG68

Your profile indicates that you signed up in 2001, but you must have kept quiet for a good while. Lately, you're all over every topic dear to the heart of social conservatives, and in each case, you spout the standard liberal line: anti-God, pro-death, and, above all, pro-"sexual freedom." You have their talking points and their snotty tone down perfectly. What exactly are you trying to prove?


10 posted on 06/03/2006 5:37:37 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: MACVSOG68
There is absolutely no threat to marriage in those states that limit it to a man and a woman;

You don't think so? There are states in which Judges are nullifying the votes to limit marriage to one man and one woman. It WILL be taken to the Supremes. Anyone wanna risk that?

14 posted on 06/03/2006 7:27:01 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: MACVSOG68
So now the radicals are weeping because the amendment doesn't completely outlaw homosexuality like most of them want.

Was Thomas Jefferson a radical? He signed a law making castration the punishment for sodomy...
24 posted on 10/06/2006 8:39:13 AM PDT by Antoninus (Attention GOP---Rule 4: See Rules 1 and 3. Rule 5: NO FOLEYS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: MACVSOG68
....an historical state responsibility.

What about Utah?

35 posted on 10/06/2006 1:16:20 PM PDT by Gelato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson