Jane Harman: Military Not Succeeding in Iraq

Newsmax.com ^ | June 11, 2006 11:14 a.m. EDT | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

[edpc]

Harman credited the Zarqawi take-out to "wonderful police work" but added: "It won't reduce the insurgency, I don't believe."

Last time I checked, TF145 were not "deputies." The insurgency was reduced in that attack....by about a half-dozen.

Dems are doing everything they can to assure another defeat in 2006. Fine by me.

[PGalt]

Jane, you ignorant...

[martin_fierro]

See Jane.

See Jane Run.

See Jane Run for Reelection.

See Jane Run to the Left.

Oh. Oh. Oh.

Pander, Jane, Pander.

[krunkygirl]

PGalt,
That was cheap, easy and FUNNY!

[GeorgiaDawg32]

on the flip side, had we NOT gotten zarqawi, she'd be saying.."we need to bring the troops home, we've been looking for zarqawi and can't find him..we're failing and losing.."

no matter what happens with these people, W can do no right..

[Nightrider]

every naysay lately notes a representative or senator by name but no longer notes their political bent (R/D) usually until later in the article.....is it because all naysayers on the war are democrats?

[SE Mom]

"Wonderful POLICE work"?

Uhhmmm...Jane- this is a WAR. That means we have SOLDIERS and MARINES engaging in combat and intel gathering on the ground. This is not a police action.

[YaYa123]

Jane you ignorant slut! There! I finished your thought.

Jane Harman makes noises like being a non-partisan patriot, she does a decent job too...............until election season rolls around.

[demlosers]

The California Democrat criticized the strategy of going after terrorist leaders like Zarqawi as "playing whack-a-mole." "We kill one person, ten arise," she complained. "That's just not the strategy that can work.

Repeat a stupid lie and then repeat again...

Oh, how many different raids took place simulatanously - 56?. We got way more the one terrorist. You don't call that whack-a-mole, it's called a round-up.

[originalbuckeye]

What an embarrassment to the SoCal area she represents!

[jazusamo]

And correct!

[Mr. Mojo]

"We kill one person, ten arise," she complained

False. Leaders with the skill of Bin Laden and Zarqawi don't just pop up overnight. ....if ever. The "he'll just become a martyr" argument is just about the lamest around. Jane's statement taken to its conclusion advocates that we shouldn't even attempt to kill terrorists.

Keep on talkin', Dems.

[SE Mom]

You know- when they pop up with that- kill one a hundred more arise crap- they fail to realize that even evil leaders don't just sprout from the ground. Zarq had years of experience...he had charisma and organizing skills. Being an effective leader of a disparate and underground organization like this one is not a small task- not just anyone can come along and take over.

[edpc]

Great starts to the thread.

:-D

[Jameison]

"It won't reduce the insurgency, I don't believe."

Jane Harman and the RATS are deeply saddened. :)

[Jameison]

"Dems are doing everything they can to assure another defeat in 2006. Fine by me"

Oh yes.
You can always count on the RATS to shoot themselves in the foot every election time. They have too much hate to keep their inner evil thoughts bottled up.
Expect yet another RATS clobbering come November..as usual.

[jps098]

Sure, my local police force has F-16s and 500 pound guided bombs. You ought to see what they use if you double park.

[edpc]

Very true. The leadership of these organizations are responsible for acquiring funds, supplies, and dupes to carry out their plans. If just anyone could do it, we'd have a lot more trouble around the world. Killing these messengers is very effective. Without them, political change can occur. I don't agree with Islam being a "religion of peace," but I'm inclined to think more of its followers wish to live long lives rather than become martyrs.

[TSchmereL]

. . . slut.

We just killed Zarqawi. So what does Jane want to do? Get rid of Rummy, change our strategy, and run away.

[edpc]

Claymores for jaywalkers!