> God is the father of all science. He is the master arquitect, the ultimate scientists.
Errrr... really? To be a scientist, you need to find some question you don't already have an answer for, and then experiments and reason your way to the facts. I was kinda under the impression that God already knew all the answers. God turning out to be a scientist means that God isn't omniscient.
all knowledge comes from God.. nothing is revealed without him doing so. As to him being the ultimate scientists, no it does not mean he's got questions to unknowns.. that's not the meaning of science. at the end of the journey through our limited view of the world arounds us, one cannot but admit that all of it is not a product of chance, but a masterpiece, and behind the masterpiece there is a painter
he is creating life forms, and sharing this knowledge with his life forms: Us
Look up the definition of scientist. Also, since you seem to be a macroevolutionist, how exactly has the scientific method been applied to the hypothesis of macroevolution, or Creationism for that fact? A proper experiment on macroevolution (including geological evolution) or Creationism cannot be done. Scientists cannot approach the scale of the universe, and knowledge of the early Earth is sketchy, moreso for the macroevolutionist, but also for the Creationist.
He likes to keep you confused.
Francis Bacon is the father of science, anyway.