Posted on 06/12/2006 5:04:33 AM PDT by Oshkalaboomboom
Thanks EJ Dionne, for explaining to me that Ive been used again. The entire week surrounding the vote on the Marriage Amendment, social conservatives were treated to liberal commentary like yours claiming that Republicans were cynically distracting the country from more important issues, like Social Security and repealing the estate tax. According to you and your liberal colleagues, I shouldnt care about social conservative issues, like gay marriage or abortion. I should really care about George Bush selling me out for issues like privatizing Social Security and cutting taxes on rich people. Im sorry to have to tell you this, but social conservatives know perfectly well what our interests are. We are capable of thinking beyond the next election cycle and of doing elementary arithmetic. Weve known for some time that Social Security needs reform, and that Democrats blocked every meaningful attempt at reform.
And let me explain something else to you. I have no prospect of receiving a large inheritance. A lot of us dont feel it necessary to attack the rich, because we have hopes of joining them someday. But even if I personally am unable to leave my children a dime, I could care less about Bush repealing the estate tax. Im not worked up about the rich passing their wealth on to their children, because most of that wealth was already taxed as income. Even if the federal government took every last nickel from The Rich it wouldnt be enough to pay the governments bills.
Lets get something straight. We actually care about the issues you think are just wedge issues. I hear from ordinary Americans all the time, through e-mail, talk radio and the in-person talks I give. These working and middle class families are tired of the social experiments of the Life Style Left.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
I really think Bush just may be impeached soon because BOB HERBERT is reporting Bush actually LOST Ohio. He has the tinfoil hat battened down and twisted. Antennas extended.
That's gonna leave a mark.
Excellent article!! She pulls no punches and tells it like it is.
I like rich folks. ;)
Not sure why. Jennifer admits the real problems facing marriage are centered around divorce with all the trajedy it leaves in its wake. She also admits she doesn't know what problems same sex marriage may create, but just doesn't like the idea of experimenting with it. Those are hardly sufficient reasons to enact a constitutional amendment. And E.J. Dionne's comments were similar to those of Charles Krauthammer, a conservative.
(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.