Sad dodge, you won't have data but I won't believe it anyway. Notice everyone I've discounted presented no data. You're claiming it's an epidemic, you have the burden of proof. I've already been in bad neighborhoods, I've also been in the rest of cities with bad neighborhoods and seen that what blights the neighborhood does not make an epidemic for the rest of the city.
I'm a person pointing out that the people making wild claims have nothing to back them up. I've listened to the answers, listened well enough to know they aren't actually answers. They have no data.
The 15 traffic fatalities was a WAG (wild assed guess), at least I'm willing to admit it. Your 15% is just as big a WAG, gonna admit it.
Sorry, you ask for proof. I showed you. 11,000+ meth labs busted in the four year period of 2000 to 2004 in Missouri alone. 2.5 times the number of traffic fatalities in the state.
But then you criticized the definition of labs.
So, you discounted the proof you asked for.
As you have done with everything presented. You ask that I hit a moving target. That is bull.
Let's say that I find statistics that shows that there was a meth bust in 10% of the residences in Seymour.
Would you accept that as proof?