Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Early Bird: Fossils Depict Aquatic Origins of Near-Modern Birds 115 Million Years Ago
University of Pennsylvania ^ | 15 June 2006 | Staff

Posted on 06/15/2006 11:39:26 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

Five fossil specimens of a near-modern bird found in the Gansu Province of northwestern China show that early birds likely evolved in an aquatic environment, according to a study reported today in the journal Science. Their findings suggest that these early modern birds were much like the ducks or loons found today. Gansus yumenesis, which lived some 105 to 115 million years ago during the Early Cretaceous period, took modern birds through a watery path out of the dinosaur lineage.

The report was co-authored by Peter Dodson of the University of Pennsylvania and his former students Hai-lu You of the Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Jerald Harris of Dixie State College of Utah and Matthew Lamanna of Carnegie Natural History Museum in Pittsburgh.

"Gansus is very close to a modern bird and helps fill in the big gap between clearly non-modern birds and the explosion of early birds that marked the Cretaceous period, the final era of the Dinosaur Age," said Peter Dodson, professor of anatomy at Penns School of Veterinary Medicine and professor in Penns Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences. "Gansus is the oldest example of the nearly modern birds that branched off of the trunk of the family tree that began with the famous proto-bird Archaeopteryx."

Gansus yumenensis takes its name from the Gansu region, where it was found, and the nearby city of Yumen. According to Dodson, Gansus is something of a lost species, originally described from a fossil leg found in 1983, but since largely ignored by science. The five specimens described by Dodson and his colleagues had many of the anatomical traits of modern birds, including feathers, bone structure and webbed feet, although every specimen lacked a skull.

"It appears that the early ancestors of modern birds lived lifestyles that today we would stereotype as being duck-like, heron-like, stork-like, loon-like, etc.," said Jerald Harris, director of paleontology at Dixie Sate College of Utah. "Gansus likely behaved much like its modern relatives, probably eating fish, insects and the occasional plan. We won't have a definitive dietary answer until we find a skull."

The skeletons, headless as they are, offer plenty of evidence for a life on the water. Its upper body structure offers evidence that Gansus could take flight from the water, like a modern duck, and the webbed feet and bony knees are clear signs that Gansus swam.

"Webbed feet is an adaptation that has evolved repeatedly in widely separate groups of animals, such as sea turtles, whales and manatees, and would only hinder climbing or landing in trees," Harris said. "The big bony crest that sticks off the knee-end of their lower leg bones are similar to structures seen in loons and grebes. These crests anchor powerful muscles needed for diving under water and swimming."

According to Harris, these adaptations all demonstrate how the Gansus branch of the family tree, the structurally modern birds called ornithuromorphs, split from the enantiornitheans (or "opposite birds"). Enantiornitheans were among the feathered fossils found in northeastern China during the 1990s.

"The enantiornitheans had the best adaptations for perching, so they were able to dominate the ecological niche that we would associate with songbirds, cuckoos, woodpeckers or birds of prey," Harris said. "Gansus appears to have had adaptations for a lifestyle centered around water, based on things like the proportions of the leg and foot bones."

While the enantiornitheans are now long gone, their perching lifestyle has now been taken over by the descendents of birds like Gansus. What remains a mystery for now, according to the researchers, is how the amphibious lifestyle of birds like Gansus helped enable them to survive the cataclysmic end of the dinosaurs 65 million years ago.

Funding was provided by the Discovery Channel (Quest program) and the Science Channel, the Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Dixie State College, the Chinese Geological Survey of the Ministry of Land and Resources of China and the Gansu Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: crevolist; daffy; dewey; donald; huey; louie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-191 next last
To: KMJames
Why not incline on the fact that the animal is so remarkably "like a duck" that it probably was a duck - in light of the fact that there is absolutely no reason to believe it wasn't a duck.

Ichthyornis looked like a late-Cretaceous gull. It had teeth.

81 posted on 06/15/2006 3:19:56 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
...Where do you see anything in the article about the beak on the missing head being "not quite?" Did the strawman put up a terrific fight?...

Actually I am looking right now at a reconstructive illustration of the specimen. I didn't realize that the image was not with the article that is posted here. I am looking an image from a different "non web" source.

82 posted on 06/15/2006 3:24:06 PM PDT by KMJames (Hyperbole is killing us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
...Where do you see anything in the article about the beak on the missing head being "not quite?" Did the strawman put up a terrific fight?...

Actually I am looking right now at a reconstructive illustration of the specimen. I didn't realize that the image was not with the article that is posted here. I am looking an image from a different "non web" source.

83 posted on 06/15/2006 3:24:07 PM PDT by KMJames (Hyperbole is killing us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: KMJames
A very similar inference was dead on the money regarding Archaeopteryx.

In 1861, the first Archaeopteryx fossil was found. It was clearly a primitive bird with reptilian features. But, the fossil's head was very badly preserved. In 1872 Ichthyornis and Hesperornis were found. Both were clearly seabirds, but to everyone's astonishment, both had teeth. It was predicted that if we found a better-preserved Archaeopteryx, it too would have teeth. In 1877, a second Archaeopteryx was found, and the prediction turned out to be correct.
Is Evolution Science?
84 posted on 06/15/2006 3:25:07 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: KMJames
Yes, I'm sure they put a head on it. Had to.
85 posted on 06/15/2006 3:26:09 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf
...When I get it done and put up on image shack I will ping you in...

Please do. Every time I see your posts I think about the three lights (or is it two lights) from Star Trek. LOL

Best regards,

86 posted on 06/15/2006 3:28:46 PM PDT by KMJames (Hyperbole is killing us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: KMJames
Every time I see your posts I think about the three lights (or is it two lights) from Star Trek.

There are FOUR lights.
87 posted on 06/15/2006 3:30:36 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: KMJames
The SToE can contend with previously considered extinct organisms being found to be extant because there is no mechanism which sets a hard and fast maximum limit to the number of generations a species can have.

Do you know of some mechanism that would?

On the other hand, finding a fossil of a human in precambrian rock would be difficult to explain.
88 posted on 06/15/2006 3:32:52 PM PDT by b_sharp (There is always one more mess to clean up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Look, I've worked with scientific illustrators before, even hired a few, and I know the license they have to make "intermediates" appear intermediate.

There is often ZERO EVIDENCE for the stuff they put in an illustration.

89 posted on 06/15/2006 3:33:02 PM PDT by KMJames (Hyperbole is killing us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: KMJames
'chain of commmand' Thats the way it feels sometimes LOL

Regards,

Wolf
90 posted on 06/15/2006 3:33:19 PM PDT by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp
...finding a fossil of a human in precambrian rock would be difficult to explain....

No it wouldn't. It would be an "anomaly" and pushed aside.

91 posted on 06/15/2006 3:35:33 PM PDT by KMJames (Hyperbole is killing us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp

Yeah, no wonder the Mark II Bird went extinct.


92 posted on 06/15/2006 3:35:59 PM PDT by ahayes ("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: KMJames

Only in the alternative reality that you and so many of your fellows seem to inhabit.


93 posted on 06/15/2006 3:36:41 PM PDT by ahayes ("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
There are FOUR lights.

Pardon me for misunderestimating the power of the ToE.

94 posted on 06/15/2006 3:37:59 PM PDT by KMJames (Hyperbole is killing us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
It would be nice to see at least ONE scientist willing to hypothesize that this creature actually didn't have a skull, and see where it leads them.

This is your brain on Creationism placemarker.

95 posted on 06/15/2006 3:51:21 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy ("You can either accept science and face reality, or live in a childish dream world" - Lisa Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

I don't know, it seems like so many people don't use their heads, maybe birds don't really need them either. The example of Mike the headless chicken has already been offered.


96 posted on 06/15/2006 3:57:46 PM PDT by ahayes ("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; VadeRetro; Dimensio; RunningWolf; b_sharp
The "not-quite-a-duck". Check it out
97 posted on 06/15/2006 4:19:02 PM PDT by KMJames (Hyperbole is killing us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KMJames

98 posted on 06/15/2006 4:27:19 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Stupidity is the only universal capital crime; the sentence is death--Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Abigail Adams

Of course. Everything's possible with creation.


99 posted on 06/15/2006 4:30:38 PM PDT by stands2reason (Rivers will run dry and mountains will crumble, but two wrongs will never make a right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: longshadow

100


100 posted on 06/15/2006 5:13:02 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-191 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson