Homosexuality misrepresented by fabrication and bias

Catholic Insight ^ | June 15, 2006 | Catholic Insight Staff

[DBeers]

Homosexual Agenda Ping!

If you oppose the homosexualization of society
-add yourself to the ping list!

To be included in or removed from the
HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA PING LIST,
please FReepMail either DBeers or DirtyHarryY2k.

Free Republic homosexual agenda keyword search [ Add keyword = homosexualagenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

[Antoninus]

Mega-bump and bookmark.

[khnyny]

Bump.

[Jeff Chandler]

he is overseeing the development of a fully cross-linked international database of medical, social science and legal citations with associated meta-analyses and aggregated data tables.

Perhaps he could pick one up on eBay?

[pgyanke]

MACVSOG68, I only see you on the Homosexual Agenda threads. I wanted to make sure you didn't miss this one...

[Procyon]

In 1957 psychologist Evelyn Hooker wrote a paper that claimed to show that homosexuality is normal.

It would be interesting to know when the first paper was written that declared homosexuality to be abnormal. I'm not referring to concepts of immoral or sinful conduct but rather the application of statistics (normal vs. abnormal) to human behavior. Normality itself is not the same as virtuous and abnormality is not necessarily a vice. Although it could be.

[VOA]

Here's a sidebar reference article.
It's Dennis Prager's review of why Judaism and Christianity rejected
homosexuality.

WARNING: Contains GRAPHIC sexual description (in context and necessary to
the exposition)...
http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/homosexuality/ho0003.html

[Rapscallion]

There are at least three topics where PC and falsehoods interferred with a determination of the truth:

Homosexuality vs. normal behavior;

Intelligence vs. Genetics, and,

Health Effects of Second-Hand Smoke(as opposed to it being a nuisance)

[Thommas]

I was in college when the APA made their infamous decision to "normalize" homosexuality. Believe me when I say. there was dancing in the streets by the in-your-face activists.

[DBeers]

MACVSOG68, I only see you on the Homosexual Agenda threads. I wanted to make sure you didn't miss this one...

I try very hard not to go out of my way to feed or harass the misguided trolls on FR -they are pesky enough without stirring them up...

However, I would suggest no damage was done in this case as it appears that the account of MACVSOG68 has been banned or suspended.

[DBeers]

Thanks for the link.

[darkangel82]

LOL! Zot.

[conservative physics]

lets see...

boys with lots of energy... have a mental problem requiring drugs

but boys who are sexually attracted to other boys... are perfectly normal?

ROFL !

It's so freaking obvious that the homosexuals infiltrated the APA leadership for the sole purpose to declaring themselves sane!

But the APA's phony proclamation doesn't fool me any more than if a group of child molesters took over the APA and declared themselves sane.

[pgyanke]

No great loss. Thank you for telling me.

[DBeers]

:-)

[Mike Darancette]

Homosexuality misrepresented by fabrication and bias

No I think I understand the concept, and it is gross!

[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

Normality itself is not the same as virtuous and abnormality is not necessarily a vice.

The abnormality of it is self-evident in that their sex organs do not match up and their biological design is entirely heterosexual. Lesbians ovulate. Whatever for? etc.

Still I hold that the underlying issue is sin. One sin leads to another leads to another. Something traumatic may have set them on this path, but the guilt of the sin, both the desire and the deed, is on them. Same goes for all of us. People sin against us; that gives us no excuse. We are still 100% guilty before God.

Immorality is always a vice. It might also be abnormal, but it is still a vice. It's an odd place to be self-righteous, but too many take that approach. To refuse responsibility is self-righteousness. Someone or something else is to blame. Child abuse is a horrible offense and I mourn deeply for the sufferings of those who endure it. But even that is no excuse.

[ElkGroveDan]

This is great stuff -- which I somehow always suspected. Thanks for the reference.

[conservative physics]

frankly I could personally care less about the morality of homosexuality.

The only time the morality issue in connection to homosexuals bothers me is when they state that the bible doesn't condemn homosexual behavior, which is blatantly false because the bible couldn't be more clear on the issue.

What bothers me is that they claim to be sane when they are clearly suffering from some sort of neurological disorder.