How To Respond To A Whining UN

WorldNetDaily ^ | June 17, 2006 | Henry Lamb

[antisocial]

Henry Lamb, working to expose the corrupt UN for what it actually is>

[antisocial]

Thought you might like this article.

[Paleo Conservative]

[antisocial]

Nice Pic., it would look great if it were targeting the UN.

[antisocial]

This article goes hand in hand with your latest.

[P-40]

Just one? Keep 'em coming!

[hedgetrimmer]

PING

[Glenn]

Most environmental laws and regulations are the result of treaty compliance or international obligations.

Thank you, spineless Senate.

[mrs. a]

So, this guy is upset because American citizens are "allowed" to express their opinions?

Yikes.

[Beckwith]

F. T. U. N.

[Non-Sequitur]

I've said all along that the best way to send a message to the UN is to leave the position of Ambassador to the UN vacant. Putting in someone like Bolton, who nobody there is going to follow or listen to anyway, is a waste. But refusing to appoint a representative and instead leaving it in the hands of lower-level staff makes it clear that we don't consider the UN important enough to send someone to deal with them.

[Logical me]

unhappy about the lack of respect U.S. citizens afford the United Nations

What do they expect. Have they respect the UN charter. Peacekeepers? BS. Oil for food? Just what good is the UN for? Kick them out and trash the building.

[G.Mason]

" ... People who have supported the U.N. in the past should realize that the institution is beyond repair, that a new mechanism must be constructed that is truly a forum for debate, not an excuse to build a global government."

Henry Lamb, finally understanding what most any concious American has known for many years.

Get 'er done!

[G.Mason]

and conscious Americans also. ;)

[ncountylee]

75% of the UN budget is for bloated (tax free) salaries. Any significant reduction in funding will punish the parasites directly.

[Paleo Conservative]

So, this guy is upset because American citizens are "allowed" to express their opinions?

Absolutely! It violates the The International Bill of Human Rights which is written similarly to the Soviet constitution. It grants rights, then takes those rights away. You have freedom of speech unless it interferes with the goals of the UN.

[antisocial]

"Thank you, spineless Senate."

Bears repeating!

[antisocial]

"So, this guy is upset because American citizens are "allowed" to express their opinions?

Yikes."

I'm afraid that you came away with a different view of what the author was saying than I did.

[antisocial]

I would prefer to start a new discussion society composed of only free societies, and leave the UN to die an unfunded death.

[antisocial]

I think the UN building should be converted to appartments, and the UN sent to Sommalia.