Posted on 06/20/2006 11:06:03 AM PDT by Monkey King
Wow. Someone has sand in his diaper.
Total BS. I've seen Carlin in one-on-one conversations, he's a blithering idiot when he strays from his script.
What a croc of dog poop. Yes being a hottie helps, but there is a pudgy finger pointing white male named Rush Limbaugh who, if he so chose, could get 10 times as many writeups and television appearances as Coulter.
You nailed it. Two excellent points. Mahalo
"Were Coulter a balding, middle-aged, paunchy, finger-pointing white male, her self-aggrandizing hatespeak would enjoy a short shelf life."
No, She would be Michael Moore.
Hey Ann, pay not attention to the DBM. You can mold my opinion anytime.
Rush and Ann, without them politics wouldn't be worth following.
It'd be too boring and depressing.
If the Left got to pick our commentators, we'd be stuck with Christopher Shays and Chuck Hagel.
Ann's point is made yet again - Liberals really don't mind being called "Godless." It's the vain jealousy crap they are hung up on.
"Told"? Threatened is more like it. Throughout the entire interview Carlin looked like his head was going to explode because he couldn't speak up like he wanted to. :-) :-) :-)
Ann punk'd not only Carlin that night, but Leno too!
LOL! I was thinking the same thing!
Rush is just another ineffective, meanspirited nobody, lunatic fringe agitator of division and hatred, not a genuine molder of opinion, who became successful because he enjoyed too much free publicity from the MSM, and for the simple reason that he is such a lovable little fuzzball. If he had been a skinny, screeching, loud-mouthed shrew, with long stringy blond hair, he never would have made it! /s LOL.
This guy's bitterness and frustration is palpable. I couldn't help chuckling as I read this piece.
Thanks for the post, and for the laugh , MK.
Agreed! His schtick was old and tired a decade ago.
"The 60s weren't good to" him, obviously! :-)
(obligatory "Cars" reference)
Typical of a lib to focus on looks.
-there is no correlation between looks and brains, if there were all those chicks in Hollywood wouldn't be so darn stoopid.
-This is a cheap shot, but maybe there is a little resentment here because most of so called intellectual females on the left are unattractive, and the good looking female celebs/lefties are dumb as a box of rocks.
It really isn't that LONG -- yet -- so you can still read through the WHOLE THING rather QUICKLY.I re-sized most of the MARVELOUS (new!) photos of Ann posted there, so that it loads MUCH FASTER for (those folks on dial-up connections) than it did YESTEDAY. :o)
"She isn't a genuine molder of opinion..."
Don't know about that. My 14 year old son just read "How to Speak to a Liberal" cover to cover and quotes her continuously.
I take some of the credit. I raised all my kids to be Christians, vote Republican and to be able to shoot what they are aiming at.
"-there is no correlation between looks and brains, if there were all those chicks in Hollywood wouldn't be so darn stoopid."
LOLOL!
Idiots like this simply make her point over and over.
She is a genius in real world politics.
still holding steady at No. 2Only No. 2?
I've got to buy another copy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.