Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Kills Minimum Wage Hike
Seattle Times ^

Posted on 06/22/2006 10:45:51 AM PDT by Sean Flynn

WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans on Wednesday killed an effort to raise the minimum wage, but Democrats who back the measure say they will try again both in Congress and through ballot measures in several states.

The federal minimum wage has been $5.15 per hour since 1997.

On a procedural measure Wednesday, senators voted 52-46 in favor of raising the wage to $7.25 in three steps, but that was short of the 60 votes needed to move the legislation forward.

The vote came one day after House Republican leaders made clear they won't allow a vote on the issue, fearing it might pass.

Still, Democrats intend to highlight the subject before November's midterm elections. Many hope to frame it as a "family values" issue they believe will draw Democratic-leaning voters to the polls, just as Republicans have tried to energize conservatives with proposals to ban gay marriage and flag burning.

"Americans believe that no one who works hard for a living should have to live in poverty. A job should lift you out of poverty, not keep you in it," said Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass.

He said a worker paid $5.15 an hour would earn about $10,700 a year, "almost $6,000 below the poverty line for a family of three."

Kennedy noted Congress has raised its own pay for the past nine years by $31,600, while the minimum wage remained unchanged.

He said backers may try to insert a minimum-wage amendment into another spending bill before November, including a proposed congressional pay raise or a bill to reduce the estate tax, which is popular among Republicans.

(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.nwsource.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: congress; minimum; minimumwage; senate; ussenate; wage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
The Democrats claim that a min. wage increase will life poor workers out of poverty, but it will only increase unemployment and put the most unskilled workers out of a job. Countless economic studies have proven the damage caused by price floors like the minimum wage, and most economists agree that the concept is inherently flawed. But the Democrats continue to disguise the real effects of a min. wage hike with their rhetoric.
1 posted on 06/22/2006 10:45:54 AM PDT by Sean Flynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean Flynn

And the Dems keep getting pummeled. I love that everyone is witnessing that they are on the wrong side of every issue these days...


2 posted on 06/22/2006 10:48:02 AM PDT by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are intimate bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean Flynn
The vote came one day after House Republican leaders made clear they won't allow a vote on the issue, fearing it might pass.

More comedy from the AP.

3 posted on 06/22/2006 10:48:08 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean Flynn

What if at your best you can only produce $5.00 worth of goods or services?


4 posted on 06/22/2006 10:48:52 AM PDT by Mikey_1962 (If you build it, they won't come...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962
Exactly. The free market is better than the some political party at equilibrating wage with marginal product of labor, but its not like the Dems care about economic facts or anything like that.
5 posted on 06/22/2006 10:51:43 AM PDT by Sean Flynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sean Flynn

take the 10 million illegals off the table and the American poor wouldnt have to worry about a min. wage


6 posted on 06/22/2006 10:57:40 AM PDT by stan_sipple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sean Flynn

What is the need for a minimum wage? I thought all Americans were so prosperous that we had to bring in Mexicans to do those jobs.


7 posted on 06/22/2006 11:01:24 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter (http://dailyterroristroundup.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962
What if at your best you can only produce $5.00 worth of goods or services?

Then no one will employ you.

8 posted on 06/22/2006 11:04:04 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (The Latest on the Ohio gov race http://blackwellvstrickland.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
Check out the family incomes of average minimum wage earners.

The United States 41 % 20 % 24 % 85 % 15 % $ 45,558
Alabama 43 % 20 % 21 % 84 % 16 % $ 38,103
Alaska 29 % 25 % 31 % 85 % 15 % $ 37,005
Arizona 39 % 23 % 23 % 85 % 15 % $ 38,971
Arkansas 29 % 25 % 30 % 84 % 17 % $ 30,954
California 41 % 16 % 23 % 80 % 20 % $ 37,548
Colorado 44 % 18 % 31 % 93 % 7 % $ 53,428
Connecticut
D.C. 16 % 34 % 11 % 61 % 39 % $ 68,344
Delaware 41 % 27 % 19 % 87 % 13 % $ 59,957
Florida 39 % 21 % 28 % 88 % 12 % $ 43,604
Georgia 37 % 24 % 17 % 78 % 22 % $ 39,618
Hawaii 27 % 16 % 9 % 52 % 48 % $ 62,573
Idaho 46 % 18 % 24 % 88 % 12 % $ 37,720
Illinois 48 % 17 % 19 % 84 % 16 % $ 55,735
Indiana 50 % 13 % 20 % 83 % 18 % $ 51,286
Iowa 53 % 16 % 24 % 93 % 7 % $ 47,657
Kansas 53 % 16 % 21 % 90 % 10 % $ 51,546
Kentucky 32 % 23 % 34 % 89 % 12 % $ 40,708
Louisiana 33 % 21 % 21 % 75 % 25 % $ 37,570
Maine 54 % 13 % 31 % 98 % 2 % $ 43,805
Maryland 41 % 24 % 20 % 85 % 16 % $ 62,317
Massachusetts 60 % 0 % 37 % 97 % 3 % $ 52,609
Michigan 48 % 13 % 27 % 88 % 12 % $ 52,193
Minnesota 53 % 11 % 30 % 94 % 7 % $ 67,744
Mississippi 28 % 27 % 19 % 74 % 26 % $ 36,569
Missouri 46 % 17 % 23 % 86 % 13 % $ 42,466
Montana 39 % 16 % 39 % 94 % 6 % $ 32,952
Nebraska 50 % 17 % 25 % 92 % 8 % $ 50,454
Nevada 39 % 25 % 22 % 86 % 14 % $ 53,453
New Hampshire 51 % 25 % 17 % 93 % 6 % $ 72,473
New Jersey 48 % 21 % 20 % 89 % 11 % $ 67,563
New Mexico 37 % 23 % 23 % 83 % 17 % $ 37,525
New York 41 % 18 % 23 % 82 % 17 % $ 51,466
North Carolina 38 % 22 % 27 % 87 % 14 % $ 42,581
North Dakota 46 % 27 % 23 % 96 % 4 % $ 50,165
Ohio 53 % 16 % 20 % 89 % 10 % $ 54,011
Oklahoma 31 % 22 % 31 % 84 % 16 % $ 36,748
Oregon
Pennsylvania 54 % 17 % 20 % 91 % 10 % $ 52,415
Rhode Island 9 % 7 % 17 % 33 % 67 % $ 52,732
South Carolina 44 % 18 % 22 % 84 % 16 % $ 40,706
South Dakota 40 % 18 % 32 % 90 % 9 % $ 44,868
Tennessee 37 % 20 % 31 % 88 % 12 % $ 36,160
Texas 32 % 25 % 22 % 79 % 21 % $ 38,047
Utah 48 % 19 % 23 % 90 % 9 % $ 48,931
Vermont
Virginia 41 % 23 % 26 % 90 % 10 % $ 56,499
Washington
West Virginia 31 % 27 % 25 % 83 % 17 % $ 31,875
Wisconsin 48 % 18 % 26 % 92 % 8 % $ 49,029
Wyoming 37 % 20 % 36 % 93 % 7 % $ 46,490

9 posted on 06/22/2006 11:12:04 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter (http://dailyterroristroundup.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

Why not make the minimum wage $20.00 an hour? Or $30.00?

If you are going to make a political statement, make one. Don't blab that making 10,600 a year is poverty when your solution makes the new annual wage 11,900.

Maroons


10 posted on 06/22/2006 11:18:35 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Democrats - The reason we need term limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sean Flynn

totally irrelevant....as it is, virtually nobody pays minimum wage now anyway. You can't get even a minimum-quality worker for that wage anymore. I only know of one place near my home that does start out at minimum, and ironically, it is a grocery store under UFCW contract, where that starting wage is written into their contract!
(hey, guys...McDonalds is stating almost two bucks an hr. higher!)


11 posted on 06/22/2006 12:18:56 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: facedown

It was my understanding that the GOP offered a one dollar increase and the RATS were not interested. That only shows that they are not really serious about raising the minimum wage. Every other thing the RATS go after they do so incrementally, why reject the $1.00 raise offered by GOP if they really care about the poor suffering masses?


12 posted on 06/22/2006 12:20:52 PM PDT by conservative blonde (Conservative Blonde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sean Flynn

Something to consider is while keeping minimum wage at that level we the taxpayers have to pay for their welfare benefits.

$5.15 x 40 hours = $206 week who could live on $824 a month?
Under $10k a year I believe that's poverty level. So again I point out that we the taxpayers will have to pay to provide welfare benefits.


13 posted on 06/22/2006 12:37:48 PM PDT by stopem (God Bless the U.S.A the Troops who protect her, and their Commander In Chief !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean Flynn
Kennedy noted Congress has raised its own pay for the past nine years by $31,600, while the minimum wage remained unchanged.

And by the looks of it Ted, it shows.


14 posted on 06/22/2006 1:06:33 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean Flynn

Additionally, only about 4% of minumum wage earners are heads of household. Most are either second income earners like a wife or teenagers, so Teddy Kennedy's sob story of minumum wage earners only making $10K a year is basically just appeal to emotion with little practical meaning in this debate. Minimum wage is a starting place for most employees who quickly move up in pay and promotions. Raising the minumum wage now will lock many of these people out of the job market by squeezing hiring and ensuring they don't make the move up in wages they could accomplish on their own if govt. got out of the way.


15 posted on 06/22/2006 1:36:04 PM PDT by MikeA (Not voting in November because you're pouting is a vote for Nancy Pelosi for Speaker of the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stopem
Something to consider is while keeping minimum wage at that level we the taxpayers have to pay for their welfare benefits.

Only 3% of American workers make the minimum wage. And that includes kids who work at amusement parks in the summer, and those who work part-time after school.

16 posted on 06/22/2006 1:40:23 PM PDT by sinkspur (Today, we settled all family business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: stopem
$5.15 x 40 hours = $206 week who could live on $824 a month?

A teenager.

17 posted on 06/22/2006 1:43:56 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sean Flynn

Unfortunately, the federal minimum wage is irrelevant. There's nothing to stop states from raising their wages. Dims are already targeting the minimum wage at the state levels. Wisconsin just raised it's minimum wage to $6.50, thanks to the gutless GOP legislature that compromised with Governor Doyle.


18 posted on 06/22/2006 1:44:23 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stopem
$5.15 x 40 hours = $206 week who could live on $824 a month?

Uhhh??? Teens working their first job and living with their parents??? How about a minimum wage that exempts people under 20 years old?

I could tolerate indexing the minimum wage to inflation. It has fallen behind a level that is damaging to the economy. Indexing it to inflation would take it off the table as a political issue and ensure that it always remains a non-issue economically.....

19 posted on 06/22/2006 1:51:33 PM PDT by Onelifetogive (Freerepublic - The website where "Freepers" is not in the spell checker dictionary...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive

That sounds like a possibility, but that is logical do you think the Pols will do something logical? :)


20 posted on 06/22/2006 1:53:54 PM PDT by stopem (God Bless the U.S.A the Troops who protect her, and their Commander In Chief !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson