Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cheney trashes media
New York Daily News ^ | 06/24/2006 | Kenneth Bazinet

Posted on 06/24/2006 5:58:31 AM PDT by StatenIsland

WASHINGTON - Vice President Cheney raked the media yesterday for exposing a secret Bush administration project to look into financial transactions of Americans as part of the war on terror. "What I find most disturbing about these stories is the fact that some of the news media take it upon themselves to disclose vital national security programs, thereby making it more difficult for us to prevent future attacks against the American people," Cheney grumbled at a GOP fund-raiser in Illinois. "That offends me."

The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal first broke the story, infuriating Cheney, who has been on a crusade to get the press not to reveal programs the White House deems necessary to fight terror but have been denounced by some privacy advocates.

Earlier this week, Cheney said the news media should withhold publishing stories when the government asks them to, on the grounds of protecting national security.

The White House was upset last month when news leaked that it was eavesdropping on Americans without first getting warrants.

The White House contends it's not an invasion of Americans' privacy to sift through international financial records.

"This terrorist tracking program ... is really government at its best. It's responsible government. It's effective government. It's government that works," outgoing Treasury Secretary John Snow contended yesterday.

"This is not a fishing expedition. We're not simply trolling for data. We're not mining data. We are, rather, making precise inquiries," Snow said.

Shortly after the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. government began secretly looking at records from the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication. The Belgium-based cooperative routes about $6 trillion daily between banks, brokerages, stock exchanges and other financial institutions. The program did not include looking at everyday transactions by ordinary Americans.

The records helped track Riduan Isamuddin, known as Hambali, the suspected Al Qaeda boss in Southeast Asia, according to The Times.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antiterrorism; cheney; earlyprevention; swift
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-116 next last
This is what passes for journalism in the world of Kenneth Bazinet. Notice that the media exposed a "secret Bush administration project", as if the program was designed to protect only those within the administration - and not the whole country.

Note also the inaccuracy as he claims it was a project to "look into financial transactions of Americans as part of the war on terror." Clearly false, this is in the lead paragraph.

In the middle of the story he feels the need to remind his readers of the hysteria involving the "domestic wiretapping" story.

Finally, in the next-to-last paragraph, literally a throw-away, he contradicts his earlier assertions by admitting "The program did not include looking at everyday transactions by ordinary Americans."

Quite a writer that Kenneth, eh?

Now contrast this with an editorial in the SAME paper on the SAME day:

"Following the Money on Terror Trail

Actually, we find it comforting to learn that our terrorist-tracking officials are keeping a good sharp eye on international financial transactions. Actually, we'd be sort of horrified if we learned they were not doing this. Wouldn't you? Certainly seems sensible that the Treasury Department got access to a Belgian database of money matters worldwide, including wire transfers between folks suspected of bankrolling terrorists. Tapping into this database - Swift, it's called, for Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication - is good police work.

So we'll not pay a lot of attention to howls that our precious civil liberties are being stolen away. These are coming from the people who wanted you to think the NSA electronic surveillance program meant Big Brother was listening every time you picked up the phone. They wanted you to think the Patriot Act meant snoopers were lurking every time you checked out a library book. They wanted you to think subway searches were about the most totalitarian thing ever. Now they want you to think you're being watched at the ATM.

Massachusetts Rep. Ed Markey, co-chair of the Congressional Privacy Caucus, charges that the administration has "concocted" justifications for the financial-info lookout. And our own Rep. Carolyn Maloney gasps at the "possible invasion of privacy." Maloney concedes there may be no particular illegality involved here. But she wants immediate congressional hearings anyway. Sigh.

Speaking of vigilance, hats off to the feds re this Miami bunch busted for plotting attacks on U.S. soil. Granted, these guys appear to be more delusional morons than serious terrorists, but if you're going to go around pledging allegiance to Osama Bin Laden and scheming to blow up the Sears Tower, law enforcement is going to take an interest. Always good to see that the War on Terror is being fought."

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ideas_opinions/story/429413p-362061c.html

That's the NY Daily News for you. Common sense editorials, nonsense news articles.

1 posted on 06/24/2006 5:58:35 AM PDT by StatenIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

Isn't this something the 911 commission followup report criticized the US for not now doing?


2 posted on 06/24/2006 6:01:26 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (There are only a few absolute truths in life, the rest are just opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

The reporting of this bothers me. But what bothers me more is that there is(are) a mole(s) in the government that is leaking this. That's who needs to be skinned alive.


3 posted on 06/24/2006 6:04:19 AM PDT by wolfpat (To connect the dots, you have to collect the dots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland
It looks like to me that it would be relativity easy to catch the government workers that are feeding the media out top secrets.

Just put a few false rumors out and see where they emerge from.

A short trial and then a public hanging.
4 posted on 06/24/2006 6:06:17 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

---What I find most disturbing about these stories is the fact that some of the news media take it upon themselves to disclose vital national security programs, thereby making it more difficult for us to prevent future attacks against the American people," Cheney grumbled at a GOP fund-raiser in Illinois. "That offends me."--

And me too!


5 posted on 06/24/2006 6:08:56 AM PDT by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

Simple as the nose on your face: The entire Democrat Party and the Mainstream media are traitors to our country and both are guilty of treason and betrayal. The American people, unfortunately will only wake up when their loved ones and children are being slaughtered, because the Dems and MSM aided and abetted our enemies. The USA is going down, and the journey down the chute will be painful and horrific, but it will have been caused by the American people themselves. Time to wake up folks, the enemy is among us in more ways than one (Democrat Party/MSM).


6 posted on 06/24/2006 6:12:24 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

"disclose vital national security programs"

Enough.

Either charge the press with treason or shut up. The President and VP need to put the smack down.


7 posted on 06/24/2006 6:13:39 AM PDT by Marius3188 (Happy Resurrection Weekend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

Is this a surprise. How else can the left-wing media help the enemy of America then to expose their covert operations. This is valuable info to the enemy and the Old Media know it.


8 posted on 06/24/2006 6:13:51 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mariabush
A short trial and then a public hanging.

Trial, post, blindfold, last cigarette (or Latte Grande)

9 posted on 06/24/2006 6:13:51 AM PDT by OSHA (If Jesus wants to work at Six Flags, he will have to cut his hair too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

Liberal Lips Sink Ships


10 posted on 06/24/2006 6:14:55 AM PDT by tomnbeverly (The calm 2006 hurricane season is a Karl Rove political stunt to refute Global warming claims)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum; StatenIsland

Cheney for President in 2008!


11 posted on 06/24/2006 6:15:06 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

I always wanted to do that; when I was waitressing and the gossip would float around I wanted to tell the one I figured was spreading rumors a "secret" about myself to found out how many people would end up knowing about it. Unfortunately, I was afraid that any "secret" I would tell about myself would be thought to be true, so I never did it. Sigh.


12 posted on 06/24/2006 6:16:43 AM PDT by synbad600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wolfpat

If the NBA can fine Mark Cuban $250,000 for running his mouth, surely Bush/Cheney can do more than whine about the Slimes publishing material that compromises national security.


13 posted on 06/24/2006 6:17:07 AM PDT by Ben Chad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

"Now they want you to think you're being watched at the ATM."

Ah, yes, let us DEMAND that all cameras at ATM machines be taken out. I have a right to my privacy when I make a withdrawl at an ATM machine and should not be photographed. And also the withdrawl should not be recorded to my account, I should just be given the money from a central fund that is federally created to dole out money to ATMs without any identifying personal information or connection. (scarcasm off)


14 posted on 06/24/2006 6:19:08 AM PDT by GreyFriar ( (3rd Armored Division - Spearhead))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mariabush
It looks like to me that it would be relativity easy to catch the government workers that are feeding the media out top secrets.

It would seem so... but one only has to look at the Wilson/Plame/Cooper affair to see how it's not.

15 posted on 06/24/2006 6:19:46 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The only good thing that can come out of this..is if the terrorists attack..they will hit a big city...a liberal stronghold..and kill liberals...they will get what they deserve...they are very very stupid......but of course they will scream help at the top of their lungs.....for the rest of us to come save them


17 posted on 06/24/2006 6:20:02 AM PDT by Youngman442002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Push the libs over the edge - run a Cheney/Rove ticket!


18 posted on 06/24/2006 6:20:25 AM PDT by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: Knitting A Conundrum

That would be epic!


20 posted on 06/24/2006 6:22:59 AM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

I think we have a dangerous situation today where the U.S. press is trying to get absolute freedom.Senator Jeff Sessions had an interesting comment on this subject:"If a spy comes into our country and gets secure information and gives it to the enemy,we prosecute them and put them in jail.But if a reporter gets secure information and publishes it to our enemies and to the whole world,they get the Pulitzer Prize."


21 posted on 06/24/2006 6:23:40 AM PDT by ardara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

Cheney "Trashes" Media? Since when is exposing the truth "trashing" someone?


22 posted on 06/24/2006 6:26:36 AM PDT by no dems ("Mr. President: Put up that wall.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum
"Cheney grumbled.... "

I always find it interesting how our side is portrayed. By using the word "grumbles" when describing Cheney's remarks it minimizes what the VP is talking about and the seriousness of leaking classified info."Grumbled" as if Cheney was some senile, old, cranky man grumbling over cold porridge. In fact most of these so called journalist aren't fit to wipe Cneney's boots.

23 posted on 06/24/2006 6:27:28 AM PDT by CremeSaver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ardara

Isn't that the truth?


24 posted on 06/24/2006 6:27:47 AM PDT by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

(Massachusetts Rep. Ed Markey, co-chair of the Congressional Privacy Caucus, charges that the administration has "concocted" justifications for the financial-info lookout. And our own Rep. Carolyn Maloney gasps at the "possible invasion of privacy." )

Ed Malarkey and Carolyn Baloney: perfect together.


25 posted on 06/24/2006 6:30:58 AM PDT by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wolfpat

Yes. We can expect the NYT to be traitorous--it's their nature. But the Bush admin MUST do something about the leaks, and the leakers MUST be punished, or all is lost. We can't let the media take control of the war in this way.


26 posted on 06/24/2006 6:31:13 AM PDT by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

I truly hope you're wrong, but some of the signs are there, that's for sure. If you are right, and we do go down, it will be on the shoulders not only of the 'Rats, but (have to say this) also on the Bush admin for not taking more aggressive action against these traitors. Mostly, they just seem to look the other way. Don't get me wrong, I love the President, but this issue is one of his (very) weak points.


27 posted on 06/24/2006 6:34:31 AM PDT by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

Either charge the press with treason or shut up



We need to officially declare war, which we should have done at the outset.


28 posted on 06/24/2006 6:35:30 AM PDT by Finalapproach29er (Americans need to remember Osama's "strong horse" -"weak horse" analogy. Let's stop acting weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

Have an obvious question, why not go after the one who is leaking the secrets to the media?

Check out all who have top security clearance and who know the "secrets" to begin with. Whoever is leaking the info needs to be in federal prison. Isn't that what they are given top security clearance for? Not to disclose sensitive material?


29 posted on 06/24/2006 6:36:41 AM PDT by stopem (God Bless the U.S.A the Troops who protect her, and their Commander In Chief !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wolfpat
But what bothers me more is that there is(are) a mole(s) in the government that is leaking this

Most likely but it could be some commie, eurotrash, America hating insider in Brussels leaking.

30 posted on 06/24/2006 6:36:42 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

I think it depends on the approach. If you want to make it difficult (because you don't want to offend anyone, after all), it can become nearly impossible. I'm betting it could be done, if only the will to do so were there.


31 posted on 06/24/2006 6:37:07 AM PDT by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

What do we do when Rep. Hoekstra,the Repulican head of the House Intelligence committee recently said on this subject:"I am not willing to go so far as to advocate the criminal prosecution of those who publish classified information"?


32 posted on 06/24/2006 6:38:55 AM PDT by ardara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

With all these leaks, I am amazed that Art Bell is still on the air. But he is, and 10m people tune in to hear all of the secrets that are not fit to print.


33 posted on 06/24/2006 6:39:04 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

34 posted on 06/24/2006 6:39:51 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Youngman442002
"...they will scream help at the top of their lungs.....for the rest of us to come save them."

Sure they will--and when we try, they will next scream that we're violating one or more of their rights. Remember the subway gas plot, and when added security was put on the subways, all the libs (led by the ACLU) fought every effort to protect the people using the subways. That is one reason I could give a fig about reducing the Homeland Security funds for NY.

35 posted on 06/24/2006 6:41:00 AM PDT by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

The Plame affair got out of hand because Bush stated at the git-go he would let the investigation take its course. That's where Clinton was so much the smarter politican than Bush. He would be out front criticizing his critics and working in support of his people. Bush is content to let things drag on forever, and from his Mount Olypus he can observe (if indeed he does care) from his perch far above the political fray. History books will write about George Bush: like Father, like son.


36 posted on 06/24/2006 6:42:23 AM PDT by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

The socialists care of only one thing... a return to power. The sell-out... or destruction of the nation in the process of acheiving that goal is simply... hard-ball politics.


37 posted on 06/24/2006 6:42:24 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Boy
Zot! Feel free to steal...
38 posted on 06/24/2006 6:43:08 AM PDT by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: stopem

They need to purge agencies that don't have the attitude "We work for the administration."

No matter who's President, executive branch agencies have a duty to support the administration.

There ought to be an extra high penalty for those that leak sensitive information like this.


39 posted on 06/24/2006 6:47:29 AM PDT by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX
"but it will have been caused by the American people themselves"
I agree with you except for the above remark. The American people are treated like Mushrooms. They are fed lies and are given no real choice in elections. You can vote for a traitorous Democrat or a less traitorous Republican, either way you lose.
40 posted on 06/24/2006 6:47:38 AM PDT by jwatzzzzz (jwatzzzzz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

Sign me up!


41 posted on 06/24/2006 6:50:52 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
One charge and one trial would put an end to this traitorous activity.
42 posted on 06/24/2006 6:52:17 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

Good point, that too, the fact whoever it is doing the "leaking of info" is not loyal to the Administration.


43 posted on 06/24/2006 6:53:33 AM PDT by stopem (God Bless the U.S.A the Troops who protect her, and their Commander In Chief !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Youngman442002
The problem with your theory is that we will have to suffer,

unlike the Jersey Girls who believe that they were the only ones hurt on 9/11.
44 posted on 06/24/2006 6:55:27 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland
We started the program after 911. It has been ongoing for almost 5 years. The program is covertly exposed to the terrorists and their enablers - by the foreign financial institutions. We discover it has been compromised and is no longer useful. We dispatch a "leaker" to the media organizations which we know to be enemies (they will surely publish it). We give them something whine about which keeps their prying eyes away from the programs that have not been exposed. Distraction and deception. Since many in the press and Democrat party are actively working against our interests, the operation succeeds in keeping them busy for weeks. The leaker is not prosecuted or discovered because we dispatched him/her. It sounds like a master plan to me.

Okay, so I'm only on my first cup of Kenya AA, I'll finish it and be all better in a few minutes.

45 posted on 06/24/2006 6:57:12 AM PDT by kddid (Hillary Clinton will never be President of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
What has that woman done to her face? If it wasn't for her gravely voice, I wouldn't even recognized Susan.
46 posted on 06/24/2006 6:57:22 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

Cheney states he is disturbed about leaks and offended that they occur. Quite an understated and gentlemanly series of comments.

And yet the hysterical headline reads: "Cheney TRASHES the Media" .... WAAAAAA!

Frankly, the lamestream media has BECOME trash. And possesses all the maturity and reasoning power of an angry over-indulged 14 year old in full rebellion against adult authority. Publishing national security secrets during wartime? Hey, if it will discredit BUSH or CHENEY or CONDI, go for it.

What sad times for our Republic, to be served thusly by our so-called free press.

But Thank the Lord for the mass communications capabilities of the internet as an alternative.


47 posted on 06/24/2006 6:57:25 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ardara
I posted this on another thread, but it fits here, too.

I have been thinking lately that there is more to this than meets the eye. There is one person, who has great influence on the MSM and the hold-overs in the intelligence agencies who has a vested interest in the failure of the George Bush presidency. This one person has many loyal followers who have no qualms about doing ANYTHING that furthers his cause. Any success that happens in the Bush presidency is one more dagger in the heart of this bitter loser, and renews the desire for revenge against the hated republicans.

Think "legacy". The left in this country...the press, the historians, the professors in the universities have united in their total committment to deny George W. Bush any legacy except that of total failure, and they are using any and all methods to achieve their ends.

This is about redeeming Bill Clinton's legacy by tarnishing that of Bush, and about giving Clinton another stint in the White House. The Clintonistas are praying for another attack and doing everything they can to bring it about, because then they can point to the eight years of Clinton's do-nothing failure and convince the voting public that they want the "good old days" back, when the elitists in the MSM had free run of the White House. Another few thousand dead Americans? To them, worth it.

Hillary in the White House, (with Bill pulling the strings), Bill over the UN...what a perfect world for the libs.

Unless the Bush administration acts, the chances of this happening get better every day.

48 posted on 06/24/2006 6:58:50 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (500 WMDs, home-grown terrorists, BUSH is doing his job per the NYT...what a tragedy for the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er
We need to officially declare war, which we should have done at the outset.

Sounds all too easy but... check out what happens to every insurance policy in the USA, many industry practices (airlines etc) and other vital institutions if/ when there is an official declaration of war.
49 posted on 06/24/2006 7:00:46 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
Or some Clinton, Democrat, career government employee.

When a person has a top secret clearance, you basically have taken an oath to keep your mouth shut for ever.
50 posted on 06/24/2006 7:02:10 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson