[pissant]

Not only a disgrace, but illegal as hell. We cannot let this man leak again...

[danmar]

Not only a disgrace, but illegal as hell. We cannot let this man leak again...

Have Pauly "Walnut" meet him in a dark alley and give him a piece of his mind! Shuddup! Badabing Badaboom!

[bayouranger]

I'll build the gallows with my own $.

They need to hang for this, but it's not PC for me to type this in RESPONSE to their treason.

Our country is F'd up if we allow this to continue w/o penalties.

What would GW1 do with this POS?

A?

Now, let's see it through.

[Zechariah11]

Thank you, Arthur Sulzberger, you twit, for making Karl Rove's life easier and rallying theconservative base.

[DejaJude]

So, when are they going to stop talking and do something about it?

[gotribe]

War of words - fighting the Slimes on its own turf. Bush / Cheney would be better off filing suit.

[IonInsights]

Arthur O/ Sulzberger Jr.

Remember that picture. Soon to be hung alongside Benidict Arnold.

[danmar]

"Some in the press, in particular The New York Times, have made the job of defending against further terrorist attacks more difficult by insisting on publishing detailed information about vital national security programs. "The first was the terrorist surveillance program. Sometimes the press calls it domestic surveillance, it is not domestic surveillance. It's a program aimed at the communications that are international in nature – at least one end of the communication has to be outside the United States, and one end has to be affiliated with or associated with al Qaeda. "The second program that The New York Times has now disclosed is the terrorist financial tracking program, just within about the last week or so. These are both good programs. They provide valuable intelligence. They are very carefully managed to safeguard the civil liberties of the American people. They have been successful in helping break up terrorist plots. They are done in accordance with the Constitution, and there has in both cases – both programs have been properly notified to the appropriate officials in the United States Congress. "The New York Times has now twice – two separate occasions – disclosed programs; both times they had been asked not to publish those stories by senior administration officials

Very well...let's fry and roast New York Times for publishing the Informations...question still remains; "WHO THE HELL LEAKED THE STORY" to the NYT...huh?

Let's get that MF and hang him/her dry for leaking the story.

[John Lenin]

The bath house bois strike again ...

[Don Carlos]

In my previous life, as a USAF Master Sergeant, and following an extensive background investigation that included everything including an anal probe (just kidding) I was cleared for Top Secret, Extremely Sensitive Information/Single Integrated Operational Plan data (TS ESI/SIOP). The nature of the information I was cleared to see and handle was not unlike the two programs the NYT printed for the world to see.

I retired from the USAF in 1981. At the time of my retirement, a Colonel briefed me that I was sworn to secrecy for life concerning ALL aspects of the information that I had previously been cleared to handle. He further explained the punishments that I could expect, should I ever divulge any classified information.

I would never, under any circumstances, discuss or divulge the info that I had been privy to. Not because of the possible punishment. Rather, because taking an oath to keep my mouth shut means something to this former "Blue Suiter"!

Why in hell should the NYT be allowed to publish, against the CINC's request, Top Secret information with impunity? I would still be in Leavenworth, had I chosen to run my mouth! Close the NYT, LAT, and other TREASONOUS friggin old media down immediately!!! Arrest their owner, editors, reporter. Try them for treason!!! When their fair trial is over, jail their asses!!!

Its' really so simple, "W". Just do it!

[TET1968]

My suggestion which I have posted before is to divert the remainder of New York's Homeland security grants to the capture of the person/persons who leaked this information to the New York Times.
The congressmen/women who were briefed about the money trail operationshould be interrogated first.

[khnyny]

The editorial at this link is must reading re NYT.

http://isteve.blogspot.com/2005/04/history-is-written-not-so-much-by.html

Excerpt:

[Buried by the Times makes the most persuasive case against the paper, arguing that it failed in its journalistic mission by not explaining that Hitler was killing Jews because they were Jews. Leff counts 1,186 stories about the Jews of Europe in the paper between the war's start in 1939 and its conclusion in 1945. Only 26 of those stories made it to Page One, and only six of them explicitly stated that Jews were the main target of the Nazis.]

And:

[If not giving enough publicity to the Holocaust was "the century's bitterest journalistic failure," then what do you call the long series of outright lies the New York Times published denying Stalin's even more deadly campaigns of mass murder in the Thirties? The Times still takes credit for this pro-Stalin fiction every time it prints the list of Times writers to have won the Pulitzer Prize. Right there at the top of the list is Walter Duranty - 1932. Isn't it time to renounce that Pulitzer and issue an apology to the millions of surviving relatives?]

They gave Duranty a Pulitzer for lies. Duranty was supposedly a Satanist, btw. I kid you not.

[Windsong]

First word that popped into my mind upon gazing on this pig: PINKO.

[ladyinred]

He needs his you know what thrown in jail!

[Knitting A Conundrum]

[no dems]

He looks a "Girlie Man".

[bray]

The Traitor Times shows exactly which side they are on. Our soldiers blood is on their hands. Good riddance when they go bankrupt.

Pray for W and Our Troops

[nopardons]

I'd get banned from FR, if I wrote my thoughts of the N.Y. Slimes and Pinch.

[Wisco]

Whoohoo! Break out them brown shirts!!!

[martin_fierro]

Hey, you're famous.

[GOPJ]

If the New York Times gave the information to Osama on a chip, someone would be tried for treason. Why is it different? Is telling a few million extra people worthy of a pass?