Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Blocks Bush, Gitmo War Trials [Hamdan wins]
breitbart ^ | 6/29/2006

Posted on 06/29/2006 7:35:30 AM PDT by Uncledave

Supreme Court Blocks Bush, Gitmo War Trials Jun 29 10:21 AM US/Eastern Email this story

By GINA HOLLAND Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON

The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that President Bush overstepped his authority in ordering military war crimes trials for Guantanamo Bay detainees.

The ruling, a rebuke to the administration and its aggressive anti- terror policies, was written by Justice John Paul Stevens, who said the proposed trials were illegal under U.S. law and Geneva conventions.

The case focused on Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a Yemeni who worked as a bodyguard and driver for Osama bin Laden. Hamdan, 36, has spent four years in the U.S. prison in Cuba. He faces a single count of conspiring against U.S. citizens from 1996 to November 2001.

Two years ago, the court rejected Bush's claim to have the authority to seize and detain terrorism suspects and indefinitely deny them access to courts or lawyers. In this followup case, the justices focused solely on the issue of trials for some of the men.

The vote was split 5-3, with moderate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy joining the court's liberal members in ruling against the Bush administration. Chief Justice John Roberts, named to the lead the court last September by Bush, was sidelined in the case because as an appeals court judge he had backed the government over Hamdan.

Thursday's ruling overturned that decision.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: detainees; duplicatethread; hamdan; ruling; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
God help us
1 posted on 06/29/2006 7:35:31 AM PDT by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

oh boy


2 posted on 06/29/2006 7:36:16 AM PDT by Halls (One Proud Texas Momma!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

War? What war?


3 posted on 06/29/2006 7:36:33 AM PDT by RexBeach ("There is no substitute for victory." -Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

You change the policy. No longer capture them you kill them, or turn them over to "local" authorities. You release the Gitmo detainees onto 3rd Ave. in NYC.


4 posted on 06/29/2006 7:37:10 AM PDT by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

A great victory for the liberals, and their need to have all of our nations secret operations unveiled before the world.


5 posted on 06/29/2006 7:37:19 AM PDT by ritewingwarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

The war on terror will last for years to come so guess the SC just sentenced him to death.


6 posted on 06/29/2006 7:37:30 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Oh, the response to this is easy: find the guys on the battlefield; ask them the questions we need to ask; and them shoot the ones who don't answer. No trials. No fuss, no muss.


7 posted on 06/29/2006 7:37:37 AM PDT by sdillard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halls

So now what. Do we create a special place for terrorists and ask them if they'd like to go kill people or stay in paradise?


8 posted on 06/29/2006 7:38:04 AM PDT by romanesq (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

What do you expect from that group. They are MASS MURDERERS THEMSELVES...

AUTHORIZING THE MASS MURDER OF UNBORN OR HALFBORN BABIES


9 posted on 06/29/2006 7:38:04 AM PDT by observer5 ("Better violate the rights of a few, than of all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

I guess the whole flag burning thing tops the "declare war already" thing on the agenda these days.


10 posted on 06/29/2006 7:39:41 AM PDT by kerryusama04 (Isa 8:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Since when does the Geneva convention apply to terrorists, who wear no uniforms, belong to the military of no country, have no authority for their actions, and do not observe the rules of war?

I am very disappointed in the S.O.B. Kennedy, who is once more showing his true colors.

We need another conservative on the Court, and preferably more, if we are ever to see an end of this lawless behavior.


11 posted on 06/29/2006 7:40:14 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

If the administration had formally declared them to be prisoners of war, this would not have happened. Instead, they farted around with euphemisms like, "enemy combatants" and allowed a legal fog to gather.

Formal declared EPWs can be detained in accordance with the applicable international protocols until the end of the war. Now, these guys are going to be drowning in ACLU lawyers to spring them.


12 posted on 06/29/2006 7:40:33 AM PDT by Gefreiter ("Are you drinking 1% because you think you're fat?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gefreiter

So what's stopping them from declaring the POW's now?


13 posted on 06/29/2006 7:41:30 AM PDT by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Bush should simply ignore the Court like Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln did.


14 posted on 06/29/2006 7:42:31 AM PDT by blitzgig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
Bush was stupid in not telling the Court to stuff it after the first decision, and I suppose he will knuckle under to judicial despotism once again.

The balance of powers depends on each branch jealously guarding its prerogatives under the first articles of the Constitution (in this case, the power of the CINC). Both the POTUS and the Congress have acquiesced to the notion of judicial supremacy.

The country is becoming a joke, incapable of defending itself, and we are asking our soldiers to fight and die for a bunch of buffoons.

15 posted on 06/29/2006 7:43:24 AM PDT by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blitzgig

Exactly. But I'm not holding my breath.


16 posted on 06/29/2006 7:44:46 AM PDT by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: observer5
What do you expect from that group. They are MASS MURDERERS THEMSELVES...

Yep, our Supreme Court justices are worse than Hitler /sarc
17 posted on 06/29/2006 7:45:04 AM PDT by AntiGovernment (A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Beats me. I don't know why they weren't in the first place.



18 posted on 06/29/2006 7:45:45 AM PDT by Gefreiter ("Are you drinking 1% because you think you're fat?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blitzgig
Bush should simply ignore the Court like Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln did.

I don't agree with this decision, but not enforcing judicial decision leads to chaos and anarchy. By the way, when did Lincoln ignore the Supreme Court? He was considering the arrest of Chief Justic Roger B. Taney, but when did he ignore a decision of the Court?
19 posted on 06/29/2006 7:46:23 AM PDT by AntiGovernment (A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
The solution is obvious: move the tribunals to friendly foreign territory where U.S courts have no jurisdiction and try terrorists there.

(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")

20 posted on 06/29/2006 7:47:17 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson