Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joe fonebone

Once prisoners are in our custody, they most certainly ARE afforded Geneva protections. That's because if we are unsure of their status, they are to be treated as captured lawful combatants. That's the law.

Since we have warehoused them for about five years, never declared them to be EPWs or held any proceedings to declare them as such, and from the outset were captured in an undeclared war, it is safe to say that we are unsure of their status. There is a lot of legal ambiguity that the ACLU, the World Court, and other liberal lawyers have wet dreams about filing law suits over.


56 posted on 06/29/2006 8:48:49 AM PDT by Gefreiter ("Are you drinking 1% because you think you're fat?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Gefreiter

You have not read the Geneva convention, have you? I was in the military. It was required reading. Try reading it before you comment. And please, go back to DU and post over there.


62 posted on 06/29/2006 9:00:49 AM PDT by joe fonebone (Time to bring back tar and feathering.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: Gefreiter
captured lawful combatants

Lawful combatants wear uniforms. Combatants without uniforms are saboteurs. The Geneva Convention does not apply to saboteurs. Sorry.

63 posted on 06/29/2006 9:03:50 AM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson