Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Weekend Talk Show *Preview* for 7/1 and 7/2/06 (not the live thread)
Network and Cable News Networks | 6/30/06 | Network and Cable News

Posted on 06/30/2006 5:24:30 PM PDT by Phsstpok

Weekend Talk Show *Preview* for 7/1 and 7/2/06 (not the live thread)

The main message is the Sunday Shows.  Message 1 will be the Saturday Shows and message 2 will be the show guest links post.  Then I'll post the ping list.

ABC This Week (George Stephanopoulos)

CBS Face The Nation (Bob Schieffer)

CNN Late Edition (Wolf Blitzer)

CNN's "Reliable Sources" (Howard Kurtz)

Fox News Sunday (Chris Wallace)

NBC Meet The Press (Tim Russert)

This is NOT intended to be the live Sunday Morning Talk Show thread. I trust AB will do that as usual. This is strictly a preview of who will be on the main shows. The idea is to give folks a chance to muster their resources for that thread.

I would particularly ask that anyone with specific knowledge or resources about the topics / guests announced for these shows post them here so that the rest of us can go into the shows with a heads up on what to look for. For example,


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abcthisweek; arlenspecter; barneyfrank; billbennett; billkeller; carllevin; chuckschumer; cnnlateedition; cokieroberts; danapriest; ericlichtblau; eugenerobinson; facethenation; foxnewssunday; fredthompson; genevaoverholser; guests; hughhewitt; jackreed; joeklein; johnharwood; johnmccain; lindseygraham; meetthepress; michaelgriffin; mitchmcconnell; peteking; saeberakat; seymourhersh; shimonperes; sundaytalkshows; tedolson; williamsafire
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
Saturday Shows for 7/1/06

The Beltway Boys (Mort Kondrake, Fred Barnes)

CNBC's Tim Russert Show (Tim Russert)

Fox News Watch (Eric Burns)

Journal Editorial Report (Paul Gigot) - FNC show page


1 posted on 06/30/2006 5:24:37 PM PDT by Phsstpok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Guests for Weekend Talk Shows

 

2 posted on 06/30/2006 5:25:30 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun; Bahbah; Txsleuth; MNJohnnie; eeevil conservative; Alas Babylon!; Seattle Conservative; ...
Ping

The Weekend Preview Thread is up

If you would like on or off my ping list please Freepmail me

The forces of the Old Empire are continuing their counter attack against team Bush.  They are throwing all caution (and discretion) away.  This could be another real interesting weekend.

The most interesting guests to me will be the debate between Mitch McConnell and Dick Durbin Chuck Schumer.  I can't understand what possessed ABC NBC to give Mitch the opportunity to trash the turban Schmuck... unless they felt that Turbin got trashed so bad last week they needed to bring in the "big guns?"  Or maybe Hillary wants to set Schumer up for a fall?  And watch for a deal to be offered on immigration between Pete King and the amnesty crowd in exchange for more funding to be made out as the bogey man in the assault on the NY Times.  Pete has doesn't have to get reelected (unless the DBM helps), dontcha know?

Watch CBS FTN for the main thrust of the counterattack this week.  They and CNN's Reliable Sources are going to try to set the debate for this week as the evil White House versus the noble free press.

The dominant meme appears to be that Bush is trampling on the Constitution and must be brought down a peg to protect us all (you know, "us," the media and the terrorists in Gitmo).  Bush has had too many good weeks, but it's now time to get back to all of the bad things that the media wants to concentrate on.  Oh, and the Democrats may be totally in disarray and not have a brain in their heads, but it's obvious to everyone (in the media) what they need to do in order to win in November... isn't it?

3 posted on 06/30/2006 5:28:00 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
IMO Pelosi yesterday handed November to the Pubbies if they will only jump on it.
4 posted on 06/30/2006 5:37:43 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (There are only a few absolute truths in life, the rest are just opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

The NYT has published the street addresses of Cheney and Rumsfeld's summer homes.

In the "Escapes" section of the June 30 edition, the N.Y. Times printed huge color photos of the vacation residences of Cheney and Rumsfeld, "identifying the small Maryland town where they live, showing their front driveways and, in Rumsfeld's case, actually pointing out the hidden security camera in case any hostile intruders should get careless," Horowitz writes.

Times Travel section writer Peter Kilborn even makes sure enemies of the two men will know such details as where Mrs. Rumsfeld shops in the eastern shore town of St. Michaels, Md. where the two administration officials have weekend retreats.

He even lets the curious know what street the Cheneys and Rumsfelds have to use to get to their own road.

It's all part of the war against President Bush, Horowitz charges.


5 posted on 06/30/2006 6:05:43 PM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Peach
The NYT has published the street addresses of Cheney and Rumsfeld's summer homes. 

Just saw that.  Thread on it here:

N.Y. Times Retaliates Against Cheney, Rumsfeld

It truly is a war, and they (the left) have decided that we are the enemy and Al Qaeda is their friend.

They're psychotic and truly dangerous.

6 posted on 06/30/2006 6:15:55 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

I just had to post that here, Phsstpok. Not to take away the discussion, but just to make sure that everyone knows. I'd love to see FR organize something powerful to condemn this in the strongest possible terms.


7 posted on 06/30/2006 6:19:43 PM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Peach

It does tie in with the theme for the weekend though, doesn't it? This is an organized and coordinated assault on the elected government of our democracy. It's gone past treason. This is verging on civil war.

Crazy people can put you at risk. Desperate crazy people are actively a danger to themselves and those around them. These loons are several sigma beyond that and are a threat to the continued survival of human civilization.


8 posted on 06/30/2006 6:23:31 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
Once again I am astounded at the amount of work you have done to give us a preview of these shows.

Because it is a First Saturday, I will be at Reconciliation and Mass on Saturday evening, so will miss Beltway Boys and Reliable Sources.

I will, however, be on the Sunay thread bright and early! Looking forward to it!

9 posted on 06/30/2006 6:24:00 PM PDT by Miss Marple (Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

John Harwood
seemingly, with Bennett, this makes it 2 to 3 in favor of the conservatives... what's wrong with the DBM?

####

Harwood is a marginal conservative, at best. He writes for the "News" side of the WSJ, not the Editorial side. Their 'news" side is quite as liberal as the NYT.


10 posted on 06/30/2006 6:36:05 PM PDT by maica (Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left by those who hustle --Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
The Supreme Court's rebuke of Bush's use of military tribunals.

The use of the word "rebuke" is very telling. Timmy is on point with the agenda.

11 posted on 06/30/2006 6:38:27 PM PDT by Bahbah (Democrat Motto: Why not the worst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: maica
Harwood is a marginal conservative, at best. He writes for the "News" side of the WSJ, not the Editorial side.

Yeah, but he's one of the "business conservatives."  Witness the title of his article " Bush and Business Struggle To Avoid Immigration Rout."

Unfortunately that's behind their subscriber's only wall, but I'm assuming that means he's playing up the amnesty / cheap labor side of the argument.  Now, it's possible that's merely to embarrass Bush, but I'm making the assumption that that is the kind of conservative he is. 

12 posted on 06/30/2006 6:59:58 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
I have sworn off all the talk shows for this weekend as I cannot abide hearing any lib saying how the Supreme Court decision yesterday is a victory for the Constitution and due process and separation of poweres blah blah blah....

I want to hear John McLaughlin or Eleanor Clift or Morton Kondracke or George Stephenapoulos or Bob Schieffer or Chris Matthews say

The Supreme Court just sided with terrorists against the American people. What the hell is up with that?

13 posted on 06/30/2006 7:46:36 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

Hi Phsstpok....I am so glad to see your wonderful thread...I look forward to Friday's just because I want to see if you post this...

Boy, I tell you what, it looks like all they are doing is having the Senators play musical Sunday shows...blech.

Well...I am really, really tired tonight...and am going to bed...but, I wanted to let you know that I saw your ping.

I will have plenty of time..and hopefully, energy to devote to this thread tomorrow..

C Ya then...sleuth


14 posted on 06/30/2006 8:13:07 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

TTFN

sleep well


15 posted on 06/30/2006 8:15:58 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

Excellent round-up of the weekend's offerings. Thank you.


16 posted on 06/30/2006 8:25:40 PM PDT by krunkygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
Only problem for the Junk Media is they did not pay attention to the 2nd part of "St John's blessed Anti-Torture" Amendment. They missed the part that limited the Terrorists access to US Courts. That 2nd part was probably why the President did not veto it. That and it was attached to a Defense Appropriation the President had to have.

So, as usual, the Junk Media has it all wrong. The stupid Leftist on the SC have trapped their terrorist buddies in Legal Limbo. They cannot be tried by Military Tribunals, they cannot be tried in US Courts and we can hold them " until the end of hostilities". The SC ACTUALLY made their situation WORSE. The can now be prisoners forever.

The other thing most of the Junk Media have missed is that this is NOT a decision from the "Bush Court" but the last incoherent, illegal and intellectually vacuous scream from the Clinton Court. Since Roberts had to recuse himself, the 5 Leftists simply chose to ignore the Constitution, ignore the Congress, IGNORE the clear direction in the Geneva Conventions about "Unlawful Combatants" and impose their own emotion based whimsy on the Law. Stupid legally, morally and politically.

Why Politically? Because this decision, like the Iraq votes, the Flag Burning Amendment vote and the Gay Marriage vote remind a disgruntled Conservative base WHY no Leftist can be trust with any political power, at any time at any level. Way to hammer home the wedges into your own political base Democrats! Way to dig yourself into a political hole all while helping fill in the hole the Republican Leadership had dug for themselves!

The really amusing thing is the Stupid Left is so hysteric about "Beating Bush" they have NO clue just how utterly stupid and counter productive the Courts actions were!

17 posted on 07/01/2006 3:26:17 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

Well Hewitt, Bennet and McConnel. I was expecting a quite thread because of the Holiday weekend but maybe not. They really are getting pathetically transparent in their Leftist Cheerleading. Keller's "defense" of the NY Times not only is nonsense, it is a lie. He makes claims that the Wall Street Journal exposed as a complete lie yesterday. Be interesting to see if any of our "Journalists" in the Junk Media will call him on his lies or if it will once again be left to Talk Radio and the Blogs to expose this treasonous fraud.


18 posted on 07/01/2006 3:33:48 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
The Supreme Court just sided with terrorists against the American people. What the hell is up with that

Actually that is just the nonsensical interpretation of the Junk Media. The real fact is the SC, thinking it was "helping" the terrorists actually have condemned them to Legal Limbo until the Congress acts. Basically the SC decision prevents the Military trying them. The 2nd Part of the McCain Torture Amendment limits access to the US Courts and, contrary to what the Junk Media "Experts" have been screaming the SC Decision SPECIFICALLY states the US can hold the terrorists "as long as hostilities exist". Stupid, illegal and intellectually vacuous, the last decision of the Clinton Court, like most of those their other decision is an utter farce.

19 posted on 07/01/2006 3:43:28 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

William Bennett is going to be on the roundtable for MTP! Stop the presses. I will have to watch that.

Unless I missed it, I think it's interesting that Tim Russert hasn't invited Tony Snow. Considering that Tony is the new WH Spokesman, it would be a typical guest slot but the fact that Tony is avoiding Tony like the plague indicates to me Russert knows he can't best Tony Snow! LOL


20 posted on 07/01/2006 5:45:06 AM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson