Posted on 06/30/2006 6:36:24 PM PDT by wagglebee
I worked for health care professional licensure board, you have to proof to revoke licensure. They just don't do based on emotionalism. Unlike the Terri supporters here on FR.
Show us where she lost her license.
I'd still like an (accurate) answer to that question. Any takers?
She was given swallow tests and failed them. Its all documented by her guardian.
What year?
Oops I meant the nurse who lost her licensure. You all know who I meant.
In the article above. Didn't you read it?
Are you sure you're not confusing her with Eileen Sullivan?
Nothing else is this case was handled based on legal precedent (like when they ignored a Congressional subpoena), I don't have any reason to think they would start now.
This is what the world comes to when you yield to the will of the godless............................
"We don't know that. Believe me, the police investigate every report that's filed. Obviously, the woman had credibility issues and it led to the revocation of licensure."
This is absurd. I can say from sorry personal experience that police do not investigate all crime reports, and when they do, the process may be a sham. I also know that licensing boards are highly political and often corrupt.
You mean her estranged "husband"?
Whatever.
No, her court appointed medical doctor.
Then why were they unwilling to let her have any water as she was dying? If she was actually unable to swallow it, that would have helped sway public opinion in their direction.
Its called criminal trespass.
Yes, I did read a little more than the headline.
A North Country Gazette exclusive reveals that Florida’s Department of Health has demanded the nursing license and nearly $1700 dollars in fines and administrative costs from a nurse who gave public testimony in the case of Terri Schiavo.
Really, I would call it enforcing a Congressional subpoena.
What do you think the word "demanded" means?
One of us is misunderstanding this -
Quote from the article: Sullivan said in her complaint that Iyer made “inflammatory comments” by revealing that Michael Schiavo’s care of Terri included words such as “when is that bitch going to die?” Ms. Sullivan demanded that “Ms. Sauer-Iyer should be disciplined for her breach of faith with Theresa Schiavo and with her profession as a registered nurse”.
Read that carefully.
She is not being charge with defaming or lying about what he said - but for "revealing" it! and should be punished for this because it was a 'breach of faith with Teresa Schiavo." (this would be Terri. I point this out because there seems to be some with reading/discernment deficit here)
As she pointed out to Colmes, who accused her of breach of faith, she pointed out that her loyalty was to her patient and her duty to protect her patient.
To try to protect Terri - or any patient - from harm is hardly a "breach of faith" to that patient!
Am I reading this right or has this country slipped so far into upside-down socialism that I am odd man out?
Maybe it's time for me to retire from this madding crowd and get further back into the woods where some sanity still exists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.