Skip to comments.
Ally Told Bush Spying Projects Might Be Illegal [programs that have not been publicly revealed....]
New York Times ^
Posted on 07/08/2006 12:26:26 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Is this another leak? Sheeesh.....
To: Sub-Driver
2
posted on
07/08/2006 12:32:25 PM PDT
by
pabianice
To: Sub-Driver
"clearly was referring to programs that have not been publicly revealed"
Looks that way to me!
3
posted on
07/08/2006 12:33:16 PM PDT
by
alice_in_bubbaland
(NY Slimes the paper of record for OBL!)
To: Sub-Driver
The source is the NYT. Wait for Hoekstra's comments after the fact before drawing any conclusions. My guess is he's misquoted here.
4
posted on
07/08/2006 12:33:18 PM PDT
by
saganite
(Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
To: pabianice
I think the main question is who had access to this letter?
5
posted on
07/08/2006 12:33:34 PM PDT
by
gondramB
(And the foolish said unto the wise, Give us of your oil; for our lamps are going out.)
To: gondramB
Just what I was thinking. I can't imagine that Hoekstra would want this to be made public. But I could be wrong.
6
posted on
07/08/2006 12:38:27 PM PDT
by
alice_in_bubbaland
(NY Slimes the paper of record for OBL!)
To: alice_in_bubbaland
>>Just what I was thinking. I can't imagine that Hoekstra would want this to be made public. But I could be wrong.<<
Yeah, but anybody from the adminsitration releasing a letter like this would be a total traitor to his boss.
7
posted on
07/08/2006 12:39:52 PM PDT
by
gondramB
(And the foolish said unto the wise, Give us of your oil; for our lamps are going out.)
To: Sub-Driver
Looks like Hoekstra is the leaker too. Or one of his staffers.
8
posted on
07/08/2006 12:41:48 PM PDT
by
Paloma_55
(I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
To: Sub-Driver
these ba$tard$ never quit with the leaks, do they ?
9
posted on
07/08/2006 12:44:04 PM PDT
by
EDINVA
To: Paloma_55
Like ive been saying for a while, and nobody seems to be talking about, the leaks are clearly from staffers on the Senate Intel committee. I have been betting on Rockefeller. It would be bad if it turned out to be a Republican Senator.
To: Sub-Driver
It seems the Admin. is in a bind. Being open with Congress virtually guarantees leaks from the disloyal Demonrats. Also, Congress has no Constitutional right to micromanage the conduct of war.
To: Sub-Driver
Good God! Who's the Slimes leak in the Bush Administration? Someone at State? CIA? FBI?
To: Sub-Driver
Again?....drip, drip, drip, drip.
13
posted on
07/08/2006 12:59:42 PM PDT
by
EBH
(Islam: A government ruled by or subject to religious authority.)
To: EDINVA
these ba$tard$ never quit with the leaks, do they ? Why should they? We're clearly not serious about catching or punishing leakers.
I'd drive 90mph every time I got on the freeway if traffic cops didn't pull people over for speeding. Same principal applies here.
14
posted on
07/08/2006 1:01:31 PM PDT
by
Steel Wolf
(- Islam will never survive being laughed at. -)
To: lilylangtree
Good God! Who's the Slimes leak in the Bush Administration? Someone at State? CIA? FBI? It may be legal for them to print classified information, but it should be 100% illegal for them to conceal their sources. We need a law to that effect.
That way, the media could still warn the American public in the event that a real whistleblower showed up with evidence of real crimes, but it would be a huge deterrant to partisan hacks who damage national security just to hurt people who's politics they don't like.
15
posted on
07/08/2006 1:05:35 PM PDT
by
Steel Wolf
(- Islam will never survive being laughed at. -)
To: hellbender
I don't care if it was illegal. If 911 happened again and a illegal action could have stopped it, I would be upset with the Government for not doing everything they can do to stop it. If the Government isn't listening to terrorist, then I got a problem with that.
Congress and Judges need to let the Executive Branch execute its job. And Congress should worry about coming up with a law that will protect our borders. North and South. And Judges need to stop taking God out of our public view. Who gave them the right to take my God given right away to exercise my religion?
And we wouldn't be talking about illegal wire tapping during WWII. We wouldn't be talking about this during the Civil War or the Revolution.
'General Washington, you can not intercept enemy transmissions. That is illegal, Sir.' If you would have said that, they would have popped a cigarette in your mouth, lit it and then they would have shot you. And you would have deserved it.
Here, let me remind the liberals what is at stake:
16
posted on
07/08/2006 1:08:02 PM PDT
by
do the dhue
(I hope y'all will help bail me out of jail after I dot Chris Mathew's eyes.)
To: Sub-Driver
I will not support any Republican who does not support President Bush. Give no money to the Republican National Committee any any of the generic GOP congressional fund raising groups. Contribute directly only to candidates who support the President and support defending this country again terror attacks.
To: Sub-Driver
""A copy of the four-page letter dated May 18, which has not been previously disclosed, was obtained by The New York Times""
Translation: Hoekstra or his aide handed it to us, and in return we give him positive NY Times exposure.
18
posted on
07/08/2006 1:16:09 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: Sub-Driver
OK..Is he saying that the surveillance is itself illegal or that not briefing his committee is illegal?
To: pandemoniumreigns
He's saying, "...me, me, me...I, I, I..."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson