Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Overhauls Five 747 Bowings
ISNA - Tehran (Iranian Students News Agency) ^ | 07-09-2006 | Staff

Posted on 07/10/2006 9:04:37 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative

TEHRAN, July 09 (ISNA)-Iran has successfully overhauled five 747 Bowings.

This is while before this, Iranian airlines had to send their planes to foreign companies, but today Iran has gained the ability to carryout this service with much lower expenses.

"Of course we can not deny the negative effects of the placed airplane part sanctions, but we have removed many of the obstacles through the aid of airlines," said the executing company's manager.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 747; boeing; boing; bowing; bowwing; bowyng; boyng; iran
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: Paleo Conservative

Ah, the 747SP, if any aircraft ever looked to be in need of Viagra.......

;)


21 posted on 07/10/2006 9:20:22 AM PDT by BritExPatInFla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

For Ahmadinijad to ride in.


22 posted on 07/10/2006 9:21:55 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Necessity is Mother of all Inventions.


23 posted on 07/10/2006 9:22:46 AM PDT by The_Republican (So Dark The Con of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Iran Overhauls Five 747 Bowings

What's a "747 Bowing"??
24 posted on 07/10/2006 9:28:13 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
They can't even spell "Boeing" correctly. I don't think I'd want to fly in Iran Air's planes.

LOL! My thoughts exactly...

25 posted on 07/10/2006 9:28:28 AM PDT by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NY Attitude
Reports at the time, (which were quickly squashed,) was that the Iranian Airlines wasn't squawking anything.
The airline was coming directly toward the Vincenes, and the "passengers" were already dead.
There were also a couple short lived reports that an Iranian F-14 was directly behind the so called commercial airliner.
The F-14 was detected resulting in the shoot down.
That theory indicates a deliberate Iranian plan to get us to shoot down the airliner.
26 posted on 07/10/2006 9:28:31 AM PDT by ASA Vet (3.03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
....said the executing (sic) company's manager.

Whoa. Freudian slip there, maybe?!

27 posted on 07/10/2006 9:31:31 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

If I remember correctly all of the people that were pulled out of the water were naked. Subsequent reports stated that they believed that all the passengers were already dead prior to takeoff. It was a sympathy ploy by the Iranians against the Americans.


28 posted on 07/10/2006 9:33:55 AM PDT by NY Attitude (You are responsible for your safety until the arrival of Law Enforcement Officers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: A message
LOL!

(RIP Gilda)

29 posted on 07/10/2006 9:36:36 AM PDT by P8riot ("You can get more with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone." - Al Capone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

LOL!


30 posted on 07/10/2006 9:40:44 AM PDT by phantomworker (The ultimate in wisdom is to live in the present, plan for the future and profit from the past.-Anon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Actually this IS the correct spelling. Its a new model reviving ancient technology for takeoffs. (To save fuel as Iran is running low - hence their desire for nuclear energy.) They were going to call it the "Arrow" but they figured that name was already in use.
31 posted on 07/10/2006 9:42:13 AM PDT by geopyg ("I would rather have a clean gov't than one where -quote- 1st Amend. rights are respected." J.McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

maybe they were modifying a Bowflex home gym.


32 posted on 07/10/2006 9:48:36 AM PDT by Rakkasan1 ((Illegal immigrants are just undocumented friends you haven't met yet!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

These aircraft fly the Mecca Pilgramage Route! When they arrive they turn to the Shrine and their landing gear flex and the aircraft says its prayers.


33 posted on 07/10/2006 9:48:48 AM PDT by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
They can't even spell "Boeing" correctly. I don't think I'd want to fly in Iran Air's planes.

Title sounds like it's about a fiddlers' convention!

34 posted on 07/10/2006 9:52:19 AM PDT by thulldud ("Para ingles, oprima el dos.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther
When they arrive they turn to the Shrine and their landing gear flex and the aircraft says its prayers.

And so do all the passengers, out of their amazement that they actually survived the flight.

35 posted on 07/10/2006 9:55:27 AM PDT by thulldud ("Para ingles, oprima el dos.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

A "Bowing"....I almost bought one of those from a guy on the street in New York City. "Psssst, hey buddy, wanna good deal on a genuine Bowing airplane?"


36 posted on 07/10/2006 9:55:45 AM PDT by Onelifetogive (Freerepublic - The website where "Freepers" is not in the spell checker dictionary...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68
But, more than likely and from my personal experience, the vast majority of the used parts have improper or incomplete paperwork. Thus rendering them as bogus parts. I had to buy a rear evac door for an MD-80 to do a test and the parts guy asked me: "With paper or without?" I asked what the difference was and he said: "$25,000.
37 posted on 07/10/2006 9:57:10 AM PDT by jettester (I got paid to break 'em - not fly 'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jettester
the vast majority of the used parts have improper or incomplete paperwork.

This is an incorrect statement, at least in commercial use.

38 posted on 07/10/2006 10:01:06 AM PDT by phantomworker (The ultimate in wisdom is to live in the present, plan for the future and profit from the past.-Anon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

39 posted on 07/10/2006 10:01:26 AM PDT by Burro Driver (Arm the Homeless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker

I was talking about only those parts that have been identified as "bogus"...the larger majority of "used parts" have the correct paperwork and can be traced by the FAA to the correct sources.


40 posted on 07/10/2006 10:05:16 AM PDT by jettester (I got paid to break 'em - not fly 'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson