Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BOB NOVAK, My Leak Case Testimony - Cites Who's Who as source
The Drudge Report ^ | july, 11,2006 | drudge

Posted on 07/11/2006 2:06:27 PM PDT by blogblogginaway

Edited on 07/11/2006 2:56:48 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

BOB NOVAK, My Leak Case Testimony: 'I learned Valerie Plame's name from Joe Wilson's entry in 'Who's Who in America'... MORE Published reports that I took the Fifth Amendment, made a plea bargain with the prosecutors or was a prosecutorial target were all untrue... MORE... My primary source has not come forward to identify himself... Bill Harlow, the CIA public information officer who was my CIA source for the column confirming Mrs. Wilson's identity. I learned Valerie Plame's name from Joe Wilson's entry in 'Who's Who in America'... I answered questions using the names of Rove, Harlow and my primary source... I considered his wife's role in initiating Wilson's mission, later confirmed by the Senate Intelligence Committee, to be a previously undisclosed part of an important news story. I reported it on that basis.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: bobnovak; cialeak; demorattraitors; fitzmas; foxnews; hype; joewilson; joewilsonlyingsob; liarwilsonoutsplame; lumpofcoal; plame; valerieplame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 541-546 next last
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
You're a BAD man Joe Wilson.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

301 posted on 07/11/2006 4:00:09 PM PDT by mware (Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
>>>I THINK that Joe Wilson is a Soros synchophant and and maybe even doing Hillary's bidding.<<<

--I believe Wilson was actually on J fn'K's election team payroll when his op-ed hit the NYSlimes.
302 posted on 07/11/2006 4:00:18 PM PDT by Shqipo (2006 is Bush Country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee

OT: Smoke reported on Chicago subway train.


303 posted on 07/11/2006 4:00:19 PM PDT by Peach (Prayers for our friends in India.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

How long before we hear from Joe and what show will he appear on?


304 posted on 07/11/2006 4:01:03 PM PDT by mystery-ak (My Son, My Soldier, My Hero..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

Comment #305 Removed by Moderator

Comment #306 Removed by Moderator

To: Christian4Bush
From when you were a kid? It's still on and they are pretty funny!

Course now I'll never look at Kondracke without seeing a polar bear again.
307 posted on 07/11/2006 4:01:16 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Peach
No you need to read the article. Below is two lines from the end of the Human Events article.

Following my interview with the primary source, I sought out the second administration official and the CIA spokesman for confirmation. I learned Valerie Plame's name from Joe Wilson's entry in "Who's Who in America."
308 posted on 07/11/2006 4:01:19 PM PDT by FloridianBushFan (I support National Security. I SUPPORT HR4437 . Katherine Harris for Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: onyx; Txsleuth; Peach; All
While the New York Times' violation of the law barring publication of classified communications intelligence information was justified by these titans of modern-day American journalism, there was said to be "no justification" at all for conservative columnist Bob Novak to have written a column identifying Valerie Plame as a "covert CIA officer."

Claiming she had been "unmasked" by Novak, they implied that her employment status in the agency was a closely held secret and that revealing this information about her was a major threat to the national security of the U.S.

The Times is being excused for compromising secret programs to apprehend terrorists, while Novak is excoriated for writing about a CIA employee working a desk job and running a "front" company. This attitude helps explain why the media went into a feeding frenzy over the Novak column about Plame but defend the New York Times for publishing stories that facilitate the murder of Americans.

In contrast to the conduct of the Times, which disclosed a highly classified NSA program in clear violation of Section 798 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code, Novak's publication of Valerie Plame's name and affiliation with the CIA was not a violation of the law.

The law which drove the investigation of the case did not apply to Novak, who was simply passing on information from administration officials about her role in getting her husband Joseph Wilson sent on a CIA mission to Africa. The law covered those who deliberately exposed a CIA officer's secret identity for the purpose of damaging U.S. intelligence. That was not the case here, and no charges in that regard have been filed.

Novak should be praised, not criticized, for bringing forth information that is still critically important to understanding the nature of the Wilson mission and the rogue CIA elements behind it. It is a story that we still need to know if U.S. intelligence agencies are to remain under the clear control of elected officials.

(snip)

As strange as it may seem, their erroneous claim about Plame's status at the CIA appears to have been taken from transcripts of the Chris Matthews MSNBC Hardball show, whose correspondent, David Shuster, had erroneously predicted that White House aide Karl Rove would be indicted for his role in talking to Novak and allegedly "outing" Plame. Shuster was also responsible for the completely unsubstantiated claim that Plame was a top agency operative on the trail of Iran's nuclear weapons program.

Her supposed intelligence "cover," like the Rove indictment predicted by Shuster, was a figment of the liberal imagination.

Some of those who met with Wilson during his many TV appearances have said that he used to introduce her as his CIA wife. There was at least one thing truly secret about her, however. Wilson had desperately wanted her role in getting him on that trip kept confidential. That's why he raised it in his book, The Politics of Truth, saying it would be a violation of federal nepotism laws if she had played such a role, and then categorically denied that she had done so.

This preemptive strike was his way of discouraging the press from unraveling the pretense that he was an objective observer who simply uncovered the facts about the Bush Iraq policy and was retaliated against for innocently providing them to the Times.

Unfortunately for Wilson and his CIA backers, the Senate Intelligence Committee found documents proving that Plame did play a role in the Wilson junket. Wisely, some reporters then started backing away from Wilson, noting his lack of credibility. But not the Matthews crowd at MSNBC.

Rather than being "covert" in any real sense, we can now say with confidence that Plame was an anti-Bush operative from the get-go, working with other like-minded agency personnel on an agenda designed to sabotage the President's 2004 re-election bid and foreign policy.

This is a story that has serious implications for the ability of the American people to affect the course of our nation and its foreign policy through free and democratic elections. If there is a rogue element in the CIA that is manipulating the press and the government behind the scenes, is this not a story that should be told? Those who run our journalism schools don't seem to think so.

On the same day the Post article attacking Novak's public-service journalism was published, the New York Times inadvertently revealed the thinking of a top member of Congress, with access to the most sensitive information about U.S. intelligence activities, on the significance of the Wilson/Plame affair.

The Times reported that Rep. Peter Hoekstra, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, had sent a private letter to President Bush about a range of intelligence issues. Predictably, The Times focused on a vague reference in the letter to secret programs that Hoekstra had wanted Congress to be briefed on. The Times thought this was proof that the administration was running illegal programs, a favorite theme of the liberal media in their zeal to discredit Bush.

But the Hoekstra letter was quite specific about what is going on in the CIA. The Times article, however, did not highlight that part of the letter in which Hoekstra referred to events in the Valerie Plame affair as the result of "a strong and well-positioned group" within the CIA that "intentionally undermined the Administration and its policies." Readers of the on-line Times were able to read the whole letter, which was posted on the paper's website.

The Hoekstra letter also refers to Stephen Kappes returning to the CIA as Deputy Director when it is believed that he "may have been part" of the group that was determined to sabotage the Bush Administration.

309 posted on 07/11/2006 4:01:33 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

Comment #310 Removed by Moderator

To: Lizarde

I don't think there was an explosion or anything though so probably not related to what happened in India today.


311 posted on 07/11/2006 4:02:04 PM PDT by Peach (Prayers for our friends in India.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl; All

Wilson sure milked this for a small fortune... I swear he was paid to speak at every major college in the nation over the past 2 years. He took those universities to the cleaners!


312 posted on 07/11/2006 4:02:16 PM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: FloridianBushFan
He has not mentioned who his primary source is yet because his source has not come forward.

True.

However, he has said that 1) the revelation was inadvertent (so no crime), and 2) it was not made by a political figure (so no jeopardy for the Administration) and 3) most important of all: This was all known to Fitzgerald.

Consequently, this investigation has been nothing more than a political witch hunt from the start, and Fitz has known it.

313 posted on 07/11/2006 4:02:31 PM PDT by FredZarguna ("If freedom wasn't free it would be called 'expensivedom.'" -- Mama Cindy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

Comment #314 Removed by Moderator

To: SE Mom
"Barnes says it's still unknown who The Source is... "

And it sounds like Novak is not going to reveal source #1. Do we have any reason to believe that Libby is - or is not - that source? Hume MUST ask Novak if Libby was his original source. If not, and if Novak learned Plame's name from info provided by Wilson himself for Who's Who, it will be somewhat embarrassing for Wilson and - to a lesser extent - Fitz. At any rate, there is no evidence of a grand conspiracy of "all the president's men" - to "get" Wilson.
315 posted on 07/11/2006 4:02:54 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: FloridianBushFan

Okay - thanks for that. So Novak really only go the info from Who's Who, not from Wilson directly.


316 posted on 07/11/2006 4:02:55 PM PDT by Peach (Prayers for our friends in India.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

And Scooter Libby had to resign. Sickening.


317 posted on 07/11/2006 4:03:28 PM PDT by doesnt suffer fools gladly (Liberals lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

So we'll be listening for Kappes name tomorrow night?


318 posted on 07/11/2006 4:03:38 PM PDT by Peach (Prayers for our friends in India.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Brit Hume said Novak learned of Plame's CIA status from JOE WILSON and then confirmed it in Who's Who!

That is not what Brit said. That is what a poster thought Brit said.

319 posted on 07/11/2006 4:04:18 PM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Novak is being discussed on MSNBC right now.


320 posted on 07/11/2006 4:04:23 PM PDT by Peach (Prayers for our friends in India.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 541-546 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson