[SJackson]

Where are the Christians?

The Persecution of the Palestinians [barf alert]

'Comrade Wolf' and the mullahs, Patrick Buchanan

Buchanan defends foreign aid – for Hamas, Patrick Buchanan

Buchanan defends foreign aid [For Hamas-he's wrong],Joseph Farah

[Stepan12]

Pat Buchanan praised Hamas in his last book for helping to get Israel to flee Lebanon. If Israel prevails in Lebanon (and I think that's a very big if with Ohlmert in power), then that will hurt the thesis of Pat's latest book and he would not be able to say I told you so.

He may have a very personal interest apart from plain anti-Semitism to wish Israel ill in this present conflagaration.

[sheik yerbouty]

Buchanan is still seething that Der Fuhrer is dead..

[LordBridey]

A voice crying in the wilderness is exactly what Buchanan is.

[johnny7]

I bet 'Spitboy' masterbated... while Buchanan let go his barrage of anti-Israel venom.

[MikeA]

Could you believe that massive circle jerk between Dumb and Dumber last night??? Anyone on these threads who ever again pretends that Saddam-loving, anti-semite loser Buchanan is a "real" conservative should have the transcript of this amen chorus between Hissy Matthews and Goebbels Buchanan shoved down their stupid throats. These are the same people who will label nearly every Republican a "Rino" even as their hero Patty Boy goes on Hardball and agrees with every treasonous word out of the left wing fever swamp guru Matthews' mouth. Even John McCain is more of a conservative than Pat "Losing Saddam Was Like Losing a Part of Myself" Buchanan.

McCain at least supports a central tenant of modern conservatism, i.e. that in the wake of 9-11 a proactive defense is what's called for, one that takes the fight to the enemy rather than waiting for the enemy to bring it here to us on our soil. Buchanan the "true conservative" apparently doesn't get that. I guess he prefers the destruction be wreacked on our soil, rather than over there. We've got to confront these people one way or another Pat. It's either on our terms or there. Which do you prefer? Loser.

[george wythe]

Buchanan needs to run for President again. He's the only patriot suggesting that we put US interests first.

We need to get out of these international alliances, close the borders, and stick to the American business, which is business.

Arabs were our friends until the Zionist lobby got us into this position. All the Islamic terrorists will stop attacking the US if we stop our support of Israel.

We don't need to fight Israel's wars. Enough of this support for Israel. America First.

[/end of Buchanan's Brigade rant.]

[gcruse]

"he, whether consciously or not, is anti-Israel"

Oh, please. There's a continuum here...

Novak > Buchanan > Sobran > David Duke

[gcruse]

Hey, I got the quiz right, except I skipped the Frum script thing which was too short and cryptic, to me anyway.

The difference was Matthews' recognizable BDS symptoms. The venom permeates his language.

[uncbob]

Somebody ought to ask PRINCIPLED Buchanan ,who ran against Bush because Bush had abandoned GOP principles , how the hell he could stay in an administartion that

1. Wanted Wage and Price Controls
2. Wanted Socialized Medicine
3. Started that insane DETENTE with the Ruskies
4. Abandoned GOP candidates in 72 so HE could get a majority
5. At worst of all opened up CHINA to the 20th century so now they are a economic and military threat to the USA

Buchanan had any integrity he would have resigned instead of going to China to kiss up with those ASS*^%$

Buchanan has no creditability

[ex-snook]

Pat is pro-America. Not pro England, Kosovo, Korea, Formosa, Israel, Kuwait, etc. etc. etc. If being pro-America is anti-all of the above, Pat is guilty as charged.