Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TWA 800: Ten Years After
Media Monitor ^ | 7/21/2006 | Roger Aronoff

Posted on 07/21/2006 6:09:14 AM PDT by Mike Bates

The tenth anniversary of the destruction of TWA Flight 800 shows that government and media cover-ups do succeed. The prevailing myth is that the fuel-tank somehow exploded, causing the plane to crash. But the evidence shows it was destroyed by missiles. The possibility of a terrorist attack, which would have been a huge embarrassment for the Clinton Administration, cannot be ruled out.

It is an event that should be treated as an ongoing investigation, and it's still not too late to determine the truth of what happened. What is not in dispute is that at 8:19 p.m. on July 17, 1996, the Boeing 747 took off from Kennedy Airport in New York, headed for Paris. About 12 minutes into the flight, the plane exploded, killing all 230 people aboard, as the burning wreckage fell into the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Long Island.

Some 260 people, unknown to each other, witnessed an object flying toward Flight 800, and of those, 92 saw the object rise from the surface. These are all people who gave sworn statements to the FBI. The eyewitnesses include highly reliable people like Maj. Fred Meyer, an attorney and pilot who is a recipient of the Distinguished Flying Cross for his service in Vietnam. The night that TWA 800 went down, Meyer was flying a helicopter for his National Guard unit, and had perhaps the best perspective of anyone who witnessed the tragedy. I described in a commentary last November his frustrating experience trying to describe to the FBI what he saw, and other examples of the compelling evidence that strongly indicate that TWA 800 was brought down by missiles, and covered up by the government. The evidence includes explosive residue found in the wreckage, radar data, and testimony. . . SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: twaflight800
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Pugsy

WOW-what a small world after all,Timothy McVeigh's wife was from a Islamic Jihadists group in that area that was connected to the Militant Muslim group he met while he was in Saudi-Arabia during the Gulf-war.


http://www.jaynadavis.com/

I found this. I dont know if it proves McVeigh was married though, as there is PILES of info there.


21 posted on 07/21/2006 7:31:46 AM PDT by weezel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: weezel

I think it was Nichols who was married to Lana Padilla.


22 posted on 07/21/2006 7:34:49 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

BUSH'S FAULT!!...oops, wrong prez! :)


23 posted on 07/21/2006 7:38:17 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pugsy

Terry Nichols former wife's maiden name was Lana Padilla


24 posted on 07/21/2006 7:47:00 AM PDT by preacher (A government which robs from Peter to pay Paul will always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: weezel
An excerpt from:

http://okcbombing.org/News%20Articles/Padilla/padilla_wsj.htm

Then there's the detail that so tantalizes many conspiracy theorists: Lana Padilla is the former wife of Mr. Nichols, charged as Mr. McVeigh's accomplice and sentenced to life in prison.

Ms. Padilla laughed when a local television talk show called to ask her about the matching names. She says she's never met Jose Padilla and isn't related to him.

But she, too, believes there was a larger conspiracy at work. After the bombing, she gave police a letter she received in 1994 from Mr. Nichols before one of his trips to the Philippines. In the letter, she says, he suggested he was "afraid of something or somebody." Ms. Padilla speculates he was worried he might be harmed if he identified his co-conspirators.

The more she looks at the mug shots, the more intrigued she becomes. "At first I found it funny," she says. "Now I think we should investigate this."


25 posted on 07/21/2006 7:48:47 AM PDT by texas_mrs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gone GF

Another case of the ruling class vs the unwashed.


26 posted on 07/21/2006 8:45:19 AM PDT by newcthem (This is the final crusade, there are only two sides: pick one.(Brought to you by the Infidel Party))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson