Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon sells sensitive surplus military equipment to public [GAO Report]
AP / CP / National Post [Canada] ^ | Friday, July 21, 2006 | Staff

Posted on 07/22/2006 2:13:50 AM PDT by canuck_conservative

Undercover U.S. government investigators purchased sensitive surplus military equipment such as launcher mounts for shoulder-fired missiles and guided-missile radar test sets from a Defence Department contractor.

Much of the equipment could be useful to terrorists, said a report by the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress.

In June, two GAO investigators spent $1.1 million on such equipment at two excess property warehouses. Their purchases included several types of body armour inserts used by troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, an all-band antenna used to track aircraft and a digital signal converter used in naval surveillance.

"The body armour could be used by terrorists or other criminal activity," noted the report, obtained Friday.

"Many of the other military items have weapons applications that would also be useful to terrorists."

Thousands of items that should have been destroyed were sold to the public, the report said. Much of the equipment was sold for pennies on the dollar.

The list included circuit cards used in computerized navy systems, a cesium technology timing unit with global positioning capabilities and 12 digital microcircuits used in F-14 Tomcat fighter aircraft.

At least 2,669 sensitive military items were sold to 79 buyers in 216 sales transactions from November 2005 to June 2006.

"DOD has not enforced security controls for preventing sensitive excess military equipment from release to the public," the report concluded.

"GAO was able to purchase these items because controls broke down at virtually every step in the excess property turn-in and disposal process."

A Pentagon spokesman, Cmdr. Greg Hicks, said Friday night he had not seen the GAO report and had no immediate comment.

U.S. Representative Christopher Shays, chairman of the House of Representatives government reform committee's national security panel, will hold a hearing on the matter Tuesday. Earlier GAO reports also found lax security controls over sensitive excess military equipment.

"During previous hearings we learned DOD was a bargain basement for would-be terrorists due to lax security screening of excess military equipment," Shays said in a statement Friday.

"Based on GAO's most recent undercover investigation it looks like the store is still open."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: gao; militarytechnology; pentagon

1 posted on 07/22/2006 2:13:52 AM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

We are committing hari-cari. Someone is asleep at the wheel. Jeeeeeeeeessssssssssssssh.


2 posted on 07/22/2006 2:44:53 AM PDT by Republican Babe (God bless America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

This article is a little confusing. Is it saying these purchases were made illegally or were the items sold by mistake?


3 posted on 07/22/2006 4:00:08 AM PDT by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Babe
Milltary surplus should be sold back at reasonable cost to the people who helped pay for it. All I see in this story is a bunch of hand ringing liberals whineing.

This whineing is one of main reasons we can not buy good surplus on the open markets instead thousand of tons of it are destoryed every year.

Just Like the days they dumped good jeeps,trks and crates of fire arms over board instead of selling them to the public. Or cut up trks and jeeps for scrap instead of selling them whole because some one might sue after using one.

4 posted on 07/22/2006 4:04:58 AM PDT by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ops33

The way I read it, it was "excess" equipment that was (legally) sold off to the public, but that could still have military-sensitive abilities - so, concern about terrorists getting it.


5 posted on 07/22/2006 4:06:37 AM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: riverrunner
That was at the end of WWII and I agree it was a travesty, but the reason was to not flood the market with surplus goods and destroy the economy. However, much of that stuff had no civilian market and it was deemed that the cost of maintenance of "no longer needed" equipment was prohibitive.

But the main reason was the influence of the Communist in the government before, during, and after the war that caused us to almost disarm at that time. When the USSR instigated the war in Korea in 1950 we were woefully unprepared.

The same thing happened under the Communists loving Carter and again under the Clintons.

This surplus property thing going on now, and it has been for a long time, is simply corruption and collusion between buyers and sellers in the bureaucracy and a semi-legal blackmarket. It is blamed on an outdated inventory control system but it seems the system is kept that way on purpose.
6 posted on 07/22/2006 5:07:46 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
so, concern about terrorists getting it.

Yeah, but look at some of the stuff they could get their hands on:

-- an all-band antenna used to track aircraft (Now all they need is the radar to use it with.)

-- microcircuits for an F-14 Tomcat (A printed circuit board, a couple of engines, wings, and armament is all that it will take for them to complete their own do-it-yourself F-14.)

Two things are probably true here: There was some stuff sold that may be of some value to terrorists. BUT This article is hyping some of these items way beyond any real potential threat.

7 posted on 07/22/2006 5:38:15 AM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

Dr.MO


8 posted on 07/22/2006 5:41:04 AM PDT by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob
(Now all they need is the radar to use it with.)

And the know how to use it.....

9 posted on 07/22/2006 5:47:07 AM PDT by Thermalseeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: riverrunner
"This whining is one of main reasons we can not buy good surplus on the open markets............."

Which forces one to buy inferior copies made in China, South Korea, etc.

10 posted on 07/22/2006 5:47:43 AM PDT by Buffalo Head (Illigitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
"Concern about Terrorists" is utter nonsense. The terrorists all ready have access to up to date Russian weaponry supplied by their terrorist state sponsors. They have NO need to buy out obsolete US equipment.

More hysteria and hand-wringing by people who don't want to do something serious about terrorists so they hyperventilate about the absurd so they can prove "they care about fighting terrorism too". Just more junk propaganda from the DO Nothings.

Be really refreshing if one time the Junk Media types put as much effort into reporting the facts about our Terrorists foes as they put into attacking our own military.
11 posted on 07/22/2006 6:14:18 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
At least 2,669 sensitive military items were sold to 79 buyers in 216 sales transactions from November 2005 to June 2006.

Maybe what the problem is the list is way way way out of date. Hyperventaliating about parts for the Tomcat, a plane the USA no longer uses or makes is absurd. Shays is a big gutless RINO. This is his way of postruing as "tough on National Security" while bad mouthing the War on Terrorists. Shays is one Congressional Seat the Republicans could stand to lose.

12 posted on 07/22/2006 6:17:46 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

Gee, give ME 1.1 million to spend and see what I come up with!


13 posted on 07/22/2006 6:20:06 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

I want a Flux Capacitor!


14 posted on 07/22/2006 6:32:48 AM PDT by Clock King ("How will it end?" - Emperor; "In Fire." - Kosh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Babe

I don't see anything there that is especially sensitive. And I don't understand the criticism of the selling it for low prices when the alternative they suggest is to destroy it and dump it in the landfill.


15 posted on 07/22/2006 12:17:43 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

We're in a war against terrorists.
It's post Sept 11th!

The DOD has a Sept 10th mentality!


16 posted on 07/23/2006 5:47:30 AM PDT by nuconvert ([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson