This is what the Soviets used to say, I kid you not.
And don't get me wrong, I am not a communist sympathizer. Far from it, I am a hardcore Reaganite for life.
But whether we have the best is debatable. Many will say that other societies are far more advanced in healthcare. One example that is touted is Iceland.
Or put it this way, if you are rich you will have access to the best. And it was the same under the Soviet system, if you were affiliated with a high ranking party member, you had the best.
I have never met any doctors like this. The main reason is that unless they are Doogie Howser, they know they will still be in residency at the age of 28, working 90 hour weeks for wages that would make a bus driver sneer.
It requires 4 years of college, 4 years of medical school, 3 to 6 years of residency, and often one or two additional years of fellowship. Then you have the expenses of establishing or buying into a practice. And most docs nowadays have more than a hundred grand in student loans to pay off, and sometimes two or three times that much.
Most physicians don't make any real significant take-home money until their mid-30's, and even then it can take a while to become established. If they didn't go into one of the high paying specialties like surgery or cardiology, they may never net more than $125,000 or $150,000 per year.
If you are in medicine for the money, you can probably do better by joining a unionized trade as an apprentice right out of high school. Work your way up to journeyman, master, and contractor. At age 35 or 40 you will be making as much money as your family-doctor friend AND have a fat pension already in the bank, while he may have a six-figure *negative* net worth.
-ccm