Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
but also guaranteed that any future states and territory would be slave

There you go. The mudslingers would have us all believe that the North was such a nobel enterprise that it fought the evil slavers to the South to end slavery. So it wasn't to end slavery at all then. It was to prevent slavery expasion to the West. And why would the North want to prevent such expansion? Purely humanitarian reasons?

93 posted on 07/25/2006 3:44:16 PM PDT by groanup (The IRS violates the 1st, 4th, 5th and 10th Amendments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: groanup
And why would the North want to prevent such expansion? Purely humanitarian reasons?

In order to contain slavery to the areas where it existed. Keep slavery out of the territories and each new state created from them would be free. Each free state had two anti-slavery senators. New free states meant anti-slavery congressmen which would dilute the south's disproportionately high congressional representation. All would keep slavery penned up so that it would eventually die. So yeah, the Republicans looked forward to the day that slavery would die. They were just realistic about it.

So why did the southerners want to open the territories to slavery?

96 posted on 07/25/2006 3:51:06 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson