Posted on 07/31/2006 3:05:40 PM PDT by Reagan Man
The hottest issue at the grass roots is illegal immigration and what our government is not doing to stop it. The question most frequently heard is, "Why doesn't the Bush administration get it?"
Maybe the Bush administration doesn't want to stop the invasion of illegal immigrants and plans to solve the problem by just declaring them all legal through amnesty and guest-worker proposals. Maybe the Bush administration is pursuing a globalist agenda. Consider this chronology.
On March 23, 2005, President Bush met at his ranch in Crawford, Texas, with Vicente Fox of Mexico and Paul Martin of Canada in what they called a summit. The three heads of state then drove to Baylor University in Waco, Texas, where they issued a press release announcing their signing of an agreement to form the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.
On May 17, 2005, the Council on Foreign Relations issued a 59-page document outlining a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter" to achieve "the freer flow of people within North America."
This document is full of language spelling out an "integrated" strategy to achieve an "open border for the movement of goods and people" within which "trade, capital, and people flow freely." The document calls for "a seamless North American market," allowing Mexican trucks "unlimited access," "totalization" (the code word for putting illegal immigrants into the U.S. Social Security system), massive U.S. foreign aid, and even "a permanent tribunal for North American dispute resolution."
Tying this document into the Bush-Fox-Martin March 23 Summit, the Council of Foreign Relations stated that the three men on that day "committed their governments" to the North American community goal, and assigned "working groups" to fill in the details.
On June 9, 2005, Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Richard Lugar, R-Ind., held a friendly committee hearing that featured task force member Robert Pastor, a professor at American University and author of the 2001 book "Toward a North American Community" (Institute for International Economics, $28). He revealed further details of the plan for a "continental perimeter," including "an integrated continental plan for transportation and infrastructure that includes new North American highways and high-speed rail corridors."
Pastor asserted that President Bush endorsed North American integration in the Guanajuato Proposal of February 16, 2001, in which Bush and Fox promised that "we will strive to consolidate a North American economic community." Bush followed up on April 22, 2001, by signing the Declaration of Quebec City in which he made a "commitment to hemispheric integration."
On June 27, 2005, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff attended a North American Security and Prosperity Partnership meeting in Ottawa at which he said, "We want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders." The White House issued a press release endorsing the Ottawa report and calling the meeting "an important first step in achieving the goals of the Security and Prosperity Partnership."
In July 2005, the White House let it be known that it is backing a coalition called Americans for Border and Economic Security organized by former Republican National Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie. Its purpose is to conduct a political-style campaign to sell the American people on a guest-worker program wrapped in a few border-security promises and financed by coalition members who each put up $50,000 to $250,000.
On March 31 President Bush met at Cancun, Mexico, for a spring frolic with Fox and the new Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Their press release celebrated what they called the first anniversary of the partnership, and Bush demanded that Congress pass an immigration bill with a worker permit program.
On May 15 Bush made a nationally televised speech in which he enunciated the amazing non sequitur that we can't have border security unless we also have a "comprehensive" bill including legalization of illegal immigrants now in the United States and the admission of new so-called guest workers.
Thanks to the investigative work of Jerome R. Corsi, we have learned that the partnership's more than 20 working groups are already quietly operating in the North American Free Trade Agreement office in the U.S. Department of Commerce, which refuses to reveal the groups' members because, in the words of partnership spokeswoman Geri Word, the Bush administration does not want them "distracted by calls from the public."
Corsi discovered recently that the partnership issued a "Report to Leaders" on June 27, 2005, that shows the partnership's extensive interaction with government and business groups in the three countries.
On June 15, 2006, the partnership's North American Competitiveness Council, consisting of government officials and corporate chief executive officers from the three countries, met to "institutionalize the partnership and the North American Competitiveness Council, so that the work will continue through changes in administrations."
The Bush administration is using a series of press releases, without authority from Congress or the American people, to shift us into the North American Security and Prosperity Partnership with "a more open border for the movement of goods and people."
No. I'm advocating we enforce our laws.
Go back to bed. You are still dreaming.
It would be a nice change.
You're welcome.
Not at all.
She, like VERY MANY patriotic CONSERVATIVE Americans have finally assessed the situation accurately.
Nobody with the name of "Bush" will ever get elected to a Federal Office again - unless everyone casting ballots speaks Spanish.
Bush Adminstration Pursuing Globalist Agenda
I hope someone has posted the "Captian Obvious" Pic
Gee, I don't know. Was Bush part of CFR? Was Reagan? Oh, wait, some of Reagan's people were. He must have been part of the globalist cabal as well. Lotsa Bush guys are members of the NRA too. Some are even Christians and Jews.
Thanks for sharing your opinion. Pat Buchanan is patriotic and "conservative". Doesn't make his writings intelligible.
Oh don't worry......I'm sure LaRaza, Mecha and the rest of the usual suspects are working overtime to make sure hispanic voter clout will increase dramatically by all means necessary.....which no doubt will be helped quite a bit by lax standards for registering new voters as well as Motor Voter....illegal or otherwise.
There was a time when Americans cared whether the people that they placed in high government positions were affiliated with groups advocating treason. For example, the federal code lists laws that prohibit members of the communist party from getting jobs in the federal government.
Since Americans seem to have forgotten how to protect their own freedom, a radical group, one that promotes communism or global socialist government, merely has to change its name, say from communist council to Council on Foreign Relations. The CFR is NOT the same as the NRA, it protects NO amendment but in fact works to defeat them by deconstructing constitutional government.
Now, if Americans knew in the past to bar people from radical groups like the communist party, why aren't we smart enough to do that today?
Th CFR has many members. Some libs and some conservatives. Not all of them are socialists. Overall, I have no use for them. Neither does the Bush.
Does the CFR support the Bush Doctrine?
Is Bush a free marketeer or not?
Has Bush called communism a scourge, or does he support it?
The turds at CFR have no more control over anything than does the Brookings institute, the Heritage Foundation, or the goddam mousketeers.
We agree that persons that are members of the communist party should not have any access to federal government jobs, or political office.
Why should members of the CFR, whose goal is to create one socialist government for the world to abide, be allowed access when communists, who have a very similar goal, are not?
>...but now she's slipping into conspiracy mode, with a decidedly nasty attitude.<
Gee, I wonder why??? Could it be that nearly all CEOs in the Federal Reserve Systen, the MSM, Universities, the Dept. of Defense, the Executive Branch (National Security Council, White House Staff), Council of Economic Advisors, Office of Mgmt. of Budget, U.S. Trade Representative, Dept. of State, Ambassadors, Dept. of Transportation, US Defense Policy Board, NASA, many in the U.S Senate, House of Representatives, Business & Industry, Financial & Banking, Foundations & Non-Govt. Org. are members of the Council on Foreign Relations; some are also Trilateralists, and some Bilderbergers? These, my friend are the Globalist Elite. P.S. didn't make it that way. The facts speak for themselves, even if they do flow off the pen of a woman who has seen all this coming for thirty five years or more. The American people don't like to listen to the warnings of the Watchmen on the Wall, to their own peril.
You still haven't gotten enough of this thread? For your info, pissant, GWB is a member of Skull and Bones, which is the American branch of the, are you ready for this????
The Illuminati! :o(
Yeah and some of my best friends are _____________ Fill in with your favorite hyphenated group.</ Sarcasm>
I am a member of the Illumanati and I can assure you that Skull and Bones is not one of our satellite conspiracy rings.
LOL! You just love to spin a story, don't you, DG? :o)
I happen to be a member of a more powerful secret society.. The Stonecutters...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.