A look at his father is part of a formula to assess how a monarchy might function and act as a catalyst unbrella under which other political partiss will be able to function without tearing each other or the country apart.
Ping
Good post.
But that wasn't the end of the story then either.
It is troubling what was noted, that most of those alive in Iran don't remember the man on the Peacock Throne.
Jimmy Carter, I hope you are visited at night by The Shah, el Sadat, Begin, Reagan, and Adm. Rickover.
This is an erroneous conclusion formed from bad logic. The transition from despotism to anything else is an abandonment of the present. No one can predict the future which is precisely why revolutions occur. Therefore it is bogus to suggest the theocratic fascism we are witnessing now was the inevitable successor to the Pahlavi Dynasty. The Shah of Iran was a despot and such the 1979 revolution was legitimate. The results of that revolution were manipulated on many fronts, some of which are only coming to light today.
The pre79 Iranian Diaspora community has something to offer after the current Iranian government implodes but recognize, nostalgia is not the engine of change. Consider the tens of thousands who regularly protest for regime change in Europe! The US could very well miss a chance at allegiance and influence in future Iran if it continues to ignore that growing movement. This was a thought provoking post... Thanks for the ping.