Posted on 08/06/2006 3:03:54 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
by Mark Finkelstein
August 6, 2006 - 17:45
Four states, four regions, four local authors giving folksy, personalized takes on the candidates and the issues. You can't knock the Times' choice of format for giving readers a sense of Senate races across the country. But when it came to substance, it soon became clear that just beneath the authors' fly-over state surface lay Upper West Side attitude.
Setting the tone, author Deirdre McNamer might have found the only farm equipment store manager in Montana who makes "taking care of the homeless" his first priority. The Dem candidate's barber was also brought in to accuse the Republican in the race of "lies [and] cheap shots," complaining for good measure about money spent on the Iraq war.
Moving on to Tennessee, author Robert Hicks made no bones about describing himself as a 'yellow dog Democrat . . . from a long line of yellow dog Democrats,' adding that he even owns a yellow dog named Jake." Bob described Dem candidate Harold Ford, Jr. as "a good man. . . . a moderate Democrat with a strong environmental record."
In contrast, Hicks portrayed the Republicans in the recently-concluded primary as having engaged in an unseemly fight over their pro-life credentials. Hicks gloomily predicted that "it’s going to prove to be a long, hot summer in Tennessee," meaning the GOP-trending Volunteer State will probably elect Republican candidate Bob Corker.
In Ohio, author Dan Chaon did cite a man who said he wouldn't vote for Dem candidate Sherrod Brown because he's been annoyed by the proliferation of emails he's been receiving from the Brown campaign.
But when it came to issues, Chaon quoted a woman who showed him a Rolling Stone magazine article by RFK, Jr. suggesting the Republicans stole the 2004 presidential election by "prevent[ing] more than 350,000 voters in Ohio from casting ballots or having their votes counted.”
Concluded the woman sourly, "It’s hard to care about this stuff when it seems like your vote doesn’t really matter anyway. I think a lot of people on both sides of the fence have a sneaking suspicion that democracy is kind of falling apart.”
The magical mystery tour ended in Minnesota. You almost thought that author Charles Baxter was going to take a balanced approach when he noted that both candidates have "100-watt smiles." Silly me. Baxter went on to claim that Republican Mark Kennedy's smile "often seems pulled back into a permanent rictus, like the old-time movie villain Mr. Sardonicus."
In contrast, Dem candidate Amy "Klobuchar’s smile may diminish if she is hit with too many Karl Rovian slimeballs."
Makes you wonder why the Times bothered. Rather than hiring writers from around the country, the editors could simply have remained in the comfy confines of W. 42nd street and told us 'Dems good, Republicans bad.'
NY Times/NewsBustes ping to Today show list.
At the end of the day, if Burns(MT)will make the issue cut and run, he`ll win. The Montana newspapers hate him,of course.
You can't really expect a Democrat newspaper like the New York Times to go out and say anything positive about a Republican. That would not make any sense. Fortunately, the Times' continuing descent into irrelevancy and oblivion makes the efforts of their travelling cub reporters futile.
Regards,
LH
The NYT is on W. 43rd
Thanks for the correction - I'll amend original NB story.
Yes! Time to sell them short by the short hairs...
Good article Mark. I'm sure you could have written about 3 times as much on this if you'd wanted to.
Happy FReeping!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.