To: SlowBoat407
Actually, he should be prosecuted for negligent disregard.
4 posted on
08/07/2006 5:19:49 AM PDT by
cyclotic
(Support MS research-Sponsor my Ride-https://www.nationalmssociety.org//MIG/personal/default.asp?pa=4)
To: cyclotic
"Actually, he should be prosecuted for negligent disregard."
I wouldn't object if he were beaten senseless on general principles.
9 posted on
08/07/2006 5:25:52 AM PDT by
BadAndy
("Loud mouth internet Rambo")
To: cyclotic
Actually, he should be prosecuted for negligent disregard. Neither lifeguards nor medical personnel are required to risk infection. Otherwise most of doctors and nurses would be already dead or being the source of new infections or pursuing other careers.
10 posted on
08/07/2006 5:26:08 AM PDT by
A. Pole
(Prophet Ezekiel: "If he has exacted usury [...] He shall surely die; His blood shall be upon him.")
To: cyclotic
How old is the, uh, lifeguard?
68 posted on
08/07/2006 7:14:28 AM PDT by
Loud Mime
("Countdown": A documentary about Keith Olbermann's dwindling IQ.....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson