1 posted on
08/07/2006 11:49:52 AM PDT by
Paul Ross
To: Paul Ross
We are just a frog in a frying pan, while China, North Korea, and Iran is manning the skillet.
2 posted on
08/07/2006 11:51:58 AM PDT by
Tulsa Ramjet
("If not now, when?")
To: Paul Ross
"For China, nuclear weapons largely have four purposes: one, strategic deterrence; two, retaliation; three, counter-coercion; and four, great-power status,"
It seems to me, second strike missles are a good thing.
3 posted on
08/07/2006 11:52:18 AM PDT by
staytrue
To: Paul Ross
Thanks to Bill Clinton.
Say, whatever happened to that "Chinagate" investigation anyway? Of that's right.... There wasn't any.
4 posted on
08/07/2006 11:52:32 AM PDT by
Brilliant
To: GOP_1900AD; Alamo-Girl; Jeff Head; Travis McGee; ALOHA RONNIE; maui_hawaii; JohnHuang2; ...
Ping.
Underestimation by Panda Huggers politically appointed in DOD...of Chinese nuclear threat capability confirmed yet again.
5 posted on
08/07/2006 11:53:14 AM PDT by
Paul Ross
(We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
To: Jeff Head
Perhaps of interest.
7 posted on
08/07/2006 11:53:43 AM PDT by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
To: Paul Ross
I don't believe this report. Everyone knows our trade with China has changed it forever. We're save now!
9 posted on
08/07/2006 11:56:44 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Bring your press credentials to Qana, for the world's most convincing terrorist street theater.)
To: Paul Ross
Oh for Christ sake...1. H-Rod will never be POTUS. 2. If china ever launched a nuke strike against us...that would be the end of China...they're be a lot of Friy Wryce..to go around.
If they want to spend money to build missiles, let'em (china)...as long as we build up our defensive capabilities as well as retarget, and improve, our existing arsenal to deal with China. Last couple of articles I read on our (U.S.) Defensive/Strategic posture...we're doing exactly that.
11 posted on
08/07/2006 11:59:14 AM PDT by
in hoc signo vinces
("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
To: Paul Ross
Why does China think we will attack them??
13 posted on
08/07/2006 11:59:45 AM PDT by
Mo1
(Bolton- "No one has explained how you negotiate a ceasefire with terrorists")
To: Paul Ross
I don't think China and the U.S. will have any armed confrontation. To my knowledge, China has never supported the U.S. in international affairs as much as the U.K. has (to give an example), but that doesn't mean that China is "against" the U.S. by any means.
To: Paul Ross
He said the first Type 94 submarine ballistic nuclear missile has been equipped and launched. And will be shadowed at ALL times with a neat little SSN from our side ready to send it to the bottom if he hears launch prep.
24 posted on
08/07/2006 12:04:37 PM PDT by
Centurion2000
(Islam is a subsingularity memetic perversion : (http://www.orionsarm.com/topics/perversities.html))
To: Paul Ross
I believe that the Chinese are copying are strategies during the Cold War against us. They may believe that they are the up and coming economic power and can outbuild, outgun, and out-quantity the United States in the long run until our economy cannot compete with them and we end up retrenching like the USSR did.
It wasn't a bad strategy then, and probably not a bad strategy now.
29 posted on
08/07/2006 12:16:14 PM PDT by
Arkinsaw
To: Paul Ross
While China has been devoting massive resources to equip, upgrade and provide the necessary resources to their military to compete if not move ahead of the U.S. The U.S. has stifled defense budgets, ransacked defense programs, targeted military spending cuts, and has sought actively to undermine our military at every level.
34 posted on
08/07/2006 12:20:13 PM PDT by
FFIGHTER
(Character Matters!)
To: Paul Ross
I'd say any missles left after the first strike can be considered second strike. Is this anything new?
35 posted on
08/07/2006 12:21:10 PM PDT by
caver
(Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
To: Paul Ross
What I don't get is you never hear any tests of these missiles. How can you know a 13,000km range missile actually works unless you test fire a couple 13,000kms?
To: Paul Ross
DING DING DING DING DING DING DING DING!!!!
ANYONE NOT a traitor and awake in DC?
54 posted on
08/07/2006 1:54:10 PM PDT by
Quix
(LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
To: Paul Ross
Bush's friends.
Our nation is sound asleep.
64 posted on
08/07/2006 4:05:53 PM PDT by
Finalapproach29er
(Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush II --> Appeasing Islam for 27 years)
To: Paul Ross
To: Paul Ross
Who CARES!!!!!!
As long as I get cheap Commie crap at walmart!
I'm soooooooooooooo glad they have most favored nation trading status!
"Free trade" rules!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy :)
68 posted on
08/07/2006 7:00:21 PM PDT by
taxed2death
(A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
To: Paul Ross
Sir, do you realize that our economy grew upward of 1.3T in the passed 36 Months for which it is equal to the entire Chinese GDP?
And do you really want me to believe that the Chinese will be conquering us? Under what circumstances and scenarios if you would detail?
Donning the tinfoil hat awaiting response....
70 posted on
08/07/2006 7:34:41 PM PDT by
danmar
("The two most common elements in the Universe is hydrogen and stupidity")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson