The contrast and brightness between the explosion and the building immediately in front of it seem very suspect.
I think Reuters found far more than two questionable photos in the Hajj database (and maybe others).
Posted on 08/07/2006 3:10:52 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast
Edited on 08/07/2006 5:13:46 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Reuters withdraws all photos by freelancer
Aug 7, 12:20 PM (ET)
LONDON (Reuters) - Reuters withdrew all 920 photographs by a freelance Lebanese photographer from its database on Monday after an urgent review of his work showed he had altered two images from the conflict between Israel and the armed group Hizbollah.
Global Picture Editor Tom Szlukovenyi called the measure precautionary but said the fact that two of the images by photographer Adnan Hajj had been manipulated undermined trust in his entire body of work.
"There is no graver breach of Reuters standards for our photographers than the deliberate manipulation of an image," Szlukovenyi said in a statement.
"Reuters has zero tolerance for any doctoring of pictures and constantly reminds its photographers, both staff and freelance, of this strict and unalterable policy."
The news and information agency announced the decision in an advisory note to its photo service subscribers. The note also said Reuters had tightened editing procedures for photographs from the conflict and apologized for the case.
Removing the images from the Reuters database excludes them from future sale.
Reuters ended its relationship with Hajj on Sunday after it found that a photograph he had taken of the aftermath of an Israeli air strike on suburban Beirut had been manipulated using Photoshop software to show more and darker smoke rising from buildings.
An immediate enquiry began into Hajj's other work.
It established on Monday that a photograph of an Israeli F-16 fighter over Nabatiyeh, southern Lebanon and dated Aug 2, had also been doctored to increase the number of flares dropped by the plane from one to three.
"Manipulating photographs in this way is entirely unacceptable and contrary to all the principles consistently held by Reuters throughout its long and distinguished history. It undermines not only our reputation but also the good name of all our photographers," Szlukovenyi said.
"This doesn't mean that every one of his 920 photographs in our database was altered. We know that not to be the case from the majority of images we have looked at so far but we need to act swiftly and in a precautionary manner."
The two altered photographs were among 43 that Hajj filed directly to the Reuters Global Pictures Desk since the start of the conflict on July 12 rather than through an editor in Beirut, as was the case with the great majority of his images.
Filing drills have been tightened in Lebanon and only senior staff will now edit pictures from the Middle East on the Global Pictures Desk, with the final check undertaken by the Editor-in-Charge, Reuters said.
Hajj worked for Reuters as a non-staff contributing photographer from 1993 until 2003 and again since April 2005. Most of his work was in sports photography, much of it outside Lebanon.
Hajj was not in Beirut on Monday and was not responding to calls. He told Reuters on Sunday that the image of the Israeli air strike on Beirut had dust marks which he had wanted to remove.
Questions about the accuracy of the photograph arose after it appeared on news Web sites on Saturday.
Several blogs, including a number which accuse the media of distorted coverage of the Middle East conflict, said the photograph had been doctored.
The contrast and brightness between the explosion and the building immediately in front of it seem very suspect.
I think Reuters found far more than two questionable photos in the Hajj database (and maybe others).
That pic definitely looks like the protestor was photoshopped into a pic of the burning background.
Yeah... that's the ticket.
Look what that says... only a majority of the images they have looked at HAVE NOT BEEN DOCTORED!!!!
Does that mean that only 450 of the 920 pictures have been photoshoped? If it were 8 or 10 percent that had been doctored they would have said "Only a small percentage have been doctored"
What should happen next is photos by other Rueters photogs should be examined carefully. If pictures taken other photographers can be found to have been doctored that would blow Reuters out of the water.
This is such a pathetic attempt at a Photoshop cloning tool, a blind man could see it was a fake in a second! All the billowing clouds are exact dups! I mean he should have at least masked it and downed the contrast and brightness to make it somewhat believable!
Okay Reuters, how many more doctored pictures have you got? Come clean, What did you know and when did you know it???
Oops, sorry, I was referring to the pictures in this thread, post #12. Looks like it's possibly the same woman.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1679185/posts
A Lebanese protester holds up his fingers showing how old he was when his family first suggested he would be trained into becoming a suicide bomber.
What are all the white splatter spots?
"Reuters withdrew all 920 photographs by a freelance Lebanese photographer from its database on Monday after an urgent review of his work showed he had altered two images from the conflict between Israel and the armed group Hizbollah."
at LEAST 2 images - There, fixed it..
Read again-- this is a considerable escalation, *all* 920 photos by Hajj have been pulled from the Reuters database.
They'll rehire him under a new name.
They're all still available on yahoo news.
My apologies for my earlier post. I had read it on Drudge, and had seen it referenced within FR threads here and there.
looks as if the tip of the second from the left plume may have been duped to enhance the fa right plume.
Following this logic to it's rational conclusion, ALL Reuters photos should be pulled...
This was a predictable action by Reuters. That is why I saved about 25 of his pictures on my 'puter. Hopefully many others have done the same.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.