Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Studies Prove... (Thomas Sowell)
Townhall.com ^ | August 9, 2006 | Thomas Sowell

Posted on 08/09/2006 7:40:52 PM PDT by Gordongekko909

Whenever I hear the phrase "studies prove" this or that, it makes me think back to the beginning of my career as an economist at the Labor Department in Washington.

Secretary of Labor Arthur Goldberg was scheduled to appear before Congress to argue in favor of some policy that the Labor Department wanted enacted into law. Down at the bottom of the chain of command, I was given four sets of census data that had not yet been published and was told to analyze these data for a report to go to the Secretary of Labor.

Two of these sets of data seemed to support the Labor Department's position but the other two went counter to it. When I wrote up a paper explaining why this was so and concluded that the statistics overall were inconclusive, there was much dismay among those in the hierarchy between me and the Secretary.

They were also puzzled as to why anyone would write up such a paper, knowing what the Department's position was on the issues. They took my paper, edited and rewrote it before passing it up the chain of command.

Secretary Goldberg then made his usual confident presentation of the rewritten study to Congress, probably unaware of the contradictory data that had been left out.

It was a valuable experience so early in my career to learn that what "studies prove" is often whatever those who did the studies wanted to prove. Labor Department studies "prove" whatever serves the interest of the Labor Department, just as Agriculture Department studies "prove" whatever serves the Department of Agriculture's interests.

It is the same story on the other side of the Atlantic, where a new book about Britain's criminal justice system exposes the fraudulent methods used to generate statistics about the "success" of various programs of alternatives to imprisonment. The book is titled "A Land Fit for Criminals" by David Fraser.

The numbers may be accurate but the definition of "success" makes them meaningless. When a criminal is put on probation and the probation is not revoked for a violation, that is "success."

Unfortunately, the British criminal justice system does not automatically revoke probation when a criminal commits a new crime.

A criminal on two years' probation can commit a crime after six months, be convicted and sentenced -- and, after serving his sentence, go back to completing the remaining 18 months of his probation, producing statistical "success" for the probation program. That is the whole point of the "study."

On either side of the Atlantic, it is a terminal case of naivete to put statistical studies under the control of the same government agencies whose policies are being studied.

Nor will it do any good to let those agencies farm out these studies to "independent" researchers in academia or think tanks because they will obviously farm them out to people whose track record virtually guarantees that they will reach the conclusions that the agency wants.

Climate expert Richard S. Lindzen of M.I.T. has indicated that the vast amount of government research money available for studies of "global warming" can discourage skeptics from being vocal about their skepticism.

This is not peculiar to studies of "global warming." Many people who complain about the corrupting influence of money never seem to apply that to government money.

If high government officials were serious about wanting to know the facts, they could set up an independent statistical agency, along the lines of the General Accounting Office, to do studies of the effects of the policies of the operating agencies.

That would mean that the fox would no longer be in charge of the hen house, whether the fox was the Labor Department, the Commerce Department, or any of the other departments and agencies.

It would also mean that various bright ideas originating in Congress or the White House would now be exposed to the risk of being shown to be costly failures or even counterproductive. Whole careers could be ruined among both elected officials and bureaucrats.

Don't hold your breath waiting for it to happen. But do keep that in mind when someone says "studies prove . . . "


TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: govwatch; liberalism; mdm; sowell; thomassowell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
Thomas Sowell strikes again! Ping coming... now!
1 posted on 08/09/2006 7:40:53 PM PDT by Gordongekko909
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndreconmarine; Alissa; arthurus; balrog666; beyond the sea; BraveMan; brf1; Brian Allen; bubman; ..
Thomas Sowell *PING*

FRmail me if you want on or off the Thomas Sowell Ping List.

2 posted on 08/09/2006 7:41:26 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909

Thanks for the ping. Brilliant as always!


3 posted on 08/09/2006 7:42:39 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Taglines for sale or rent. Good "one liners", 50 cents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
I defy anyone to produce a single syllable penned by this man that was not simultaneously true and profound.
4 posted on 08/09/2006 7:51:28 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker; Gordongekko909

<< Thanks for the ping. Brilliant as always! >>

Doctor Sowell makes me proud to be his fellow (hyphenated) American!

(I'm an AMERICAN-American, too!)


5 posted on 08/09/2006 7:53:18 PM PDT by Brian Allen ("In war there is no substitute for victory." General Douglas MacArthur -- GINGRICH/TANCREDO2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

To hell with the hyphen. Either you are an American (no hyphen) or you are not.


6 posted on 08/09/2006 7:55:30 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

B U M P


7 posted on 08/09/2006 7:57:16 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Taglines for sale or rent. Good "one liners", 50 cents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

In another place and time, he would go down in history as one of our greatest Presidents : )


8 posted on 08/09/2006 7:59:48 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Taglines for sale or rent. Good "one liners", 50 cents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

Dr. Sowell is a BRILLIANT-American, thank you very much!


9 posted on 08/09/2006 8:00:45 PM PDT by George Smiley (This tagline has been Reutered. (Can you tell?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909

I'd like to be on the Thomas Sowell ping list, please.


10 posted on 08/09/2006 8:06:49 PM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909

bump


11 posted on 08/09/2006 8:07:58 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909

Thanks for the ping and another great piece by Dr. Sowell.


12 posted on 08/09/2006 8:09:28 PM PDT by jazusamo (DIANA IREY for Congress, PA 12th District: Retire murtha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Added!


13 posted on 08/09/2006 8:09:58 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909

I love this man.

If he can get a 25 year old punk rocker interested in economics, he can do anything.


14 posted on 08/09/2006 8:13:39 PM PDT by Shion (Jaded Southern Californian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shion

Sowell could get a dead armadillo interested in economics. He's that good.


15 posted on 08/09/2006 8:16:21 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909
Sowell makes excellent arguments that demonstrate the need for critical thinking. Each topic/case mentioned (economics, criminal justice, global warming) is interesting in its own right.

In an attempt to rhyme some of the wrongs of the world, I offer the following:

"Studies show" don't make it so.

"Science says" is a line that pays.

"Experts claim." I declaim.
16 posted on 08/09/2006 8:20:21 PM PDT by ChessExpert (MSM: America's one (Democratic) party press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909

80% of ongoing studies claim that studies are great!


17 posted on 08/09/2006 8:20:30 PM PDT by seancdx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909
Climate expert Richard S. Lindzen of M.I.T. has indicated that the vast amount of government research money available for studies of "global warming" can discourage skeptics from being vocal about their skepticism...watched an interesting exchange on C-Span yesterday between a a congresswoman (from Tennessee I believe) and whateverhisfirstnameis Mann, who did the infamous "hockey stick" study purporting to prove global warming - she was trying to get him to agree to submit his data to an independent committee for evaluation, and he kept insisting that his study had been "peer-reviewed" before being published in supposedly reputable journals - another expert on the panel, a statistician, called Mann out, emphasizing that most such peer reviews were really done by others in the "social network" of scientists working in the field and thus weren't likely to provide a genuinely objective evaluation - he recommended that independent review panels be adopted for such studies where important public policy decisions might result based on study findings - Sowell is right on target......
18 posted on 08/09/2006 8:47:19 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seancdx

But there's only a 10% chance of that.


19 posted on 08/09/2006 9:39:49 PM PDT by spinestein (Follow "The Bronze Rule")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909
what "studies prove" is often whatever those who did the studies wanted to prove.

Spot on.

20 posted on 08/09/2006 9:45:03 PM PDT by T. Buzzard Trueblood ("No one cried when Clinton spied." -Crosslake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson