Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vetvetdoug

This just doesn't set well with me. She LEGALLY purchased the ammo. It legally was in her posession. Taking her own leagl personal property out of the country should not be a crime. And with whom did she conspire? One person cannot conspire.........


8 posted on 08/10/2006 9:16:45 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger
Taking her own legal personal property out of the country should not be a crime.

Out of the country? That's nothing. Try taking your legally-owned personal property into New York City or Chicago. You'd be charged just the same.

26 posted on 08/10/2006 9:30:02 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Taking her own leagl personal property out of the country should not be a crime

Cool. I own a blueprint of the old Fat Man nuclear bomb that we dropped on Nagasaki (hangs on the wall in my shop). I suppose you'll have no complaints if I take it with me on my vacation to Central America next summer.

/sarc (obviously)

The US has the right to regulate the exportation of any information or material that can be used against us either criminally or militarily. This means that my blueprint shouldn't be taken outside of the country, and neither should these 13,000 rounds of ammunition. Since most firearms in Mexico are owned either by drug smugglers (MS13) or communist rebels (Chiapas), the US has a very real interest in stopping the illicit exportation of ammunition to that country.
38 posted on 08/10/2006 9:48:50 AM PDT by Arthalion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson