Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lebanon photos: Take a closer look (In the LA Times???)
LA Times ^ | 8/12/06 | Tim Rutten

Posted on 08/12/2006 8:59:51 AM PDT by pissant

THE controversy this week over Reuters' distribution of digitally manipulated, falsely labeled and — probably — staged photos of the fighting in Lebanon hasn't been nearly as large as it should have been.

Credit for bringing the sordid business to light goes to Charles Johnson, a musician and Los Angeles-based blogger, who operates a hard-edged right wing website unfathomably called Little Green Footballs. Last Saturday, Reuters, which is headquartered in London, transmitted two photographs by one of its regular Lebanese freelance photographers, Adnan Hajj, whose work for the agency has appeared in many American newspapers since 1993. An anonymous tipster reportedly drew Johnson's attention to the photos, and he immediately recognized that one purporting to show the aftermath of an Israeli airstrike on Beirut had been digitally enhanced. It subsequently emerged that another image allegedly showing an Israeli fighter launching multiple air-to-ground missiles also had been altered using the common Photoshop computer program.

Johnson quickly posted a denunciation of the phony photo. Within 18 hours, Reuters killed the manipulated images, fired Hajj and removed 920 of his photos from its digital archives. Paul Holmes, the Reuters editor responsible for standards and ethics, told the New York Times that all the withdrawn images were being reviewed "to see if any others have been improperly altered." He also said the news agency was investigating how the photos slipped by its editors but noted that on the day in question, "we published 2,000 photos. It was handled by someone on a very busy day at a more junior level than we would wish for in ideal circumstances."

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: fakebutaccurate; fakedphotos; fauxtography; fraud; islamoganda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Why this is in the entertainment section of the website I can't fathom. Not sure if it made it into the paper itself or not.

But at least ONE person at the LA Times is honest. That in itself is a huge suprise.

1 posted on 08/12/2006 8:59:52 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant
The LA Times went through the same thing a few years ago, when they ran a photograph that turned out to be a composite of two separate photographs. Looks like they've learned something.
2 posted on 08/12/2006 9:02:26 AM PDT by Celtjew Libertarian ("I'm not a hawk or a dove. I just don't want my country to be a pigeon." -- Henry "Scoop" Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

As long as we keep exposing the Liberal MSM, the more readship and viewership stops sucking up their propaganda. Hopefully, they will all be in the unemployment lines where all good Liberals should be.


3 posted on 08/12/2006 9:06:18 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtjew Libertarian

At least the guy writing in the entertainment pages has. The editorial board is a pack of committed leftists.


4 posted on 08/12/2006 9:06:37 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant
all the withdrawn images were being reviewed "to see if any others have been improperly altered

As apposed to the images that are properly altered???
5 posted on 08/12/2006 9:06:41 AM PDT by Axelsrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

MARK


6 posted on 08/12/2006 9:07:18 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Never trust Democrats with national security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

FYI


7 posted on 08/12/2006 9:07:43 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Never trust Democrats with national security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Axelsrd

As apposed to the images that are properly altered???

**
Good one!


8 posted on 08/12/2006 9:08:20 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Never trust Democrats with national security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Saturday edition.


9 posted on 08/12/2006 9:09:03 AM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead; Axelsrd

I could not believe my eyes reading this as this writer's closing statement:

"That brings us to the most troubling of the possible explanations for these fraudulent photos, which is that some of the photojournalists involved are either intimidated by or sympathetic to the Hezbollah terrorists. It's a possibility fraught with harsh implications, but it needs to be examined thoroughly and openly.

Johnson and his colleagues have done the serious news media a service. Failure to follow up on it would be worse than churlish; it would be irresponsible. "

So maybe they are realizing, just a bit, that their credibility at the LA Times is in need of severe repairs.


10 posted on 08/12/2006 9:09:49 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Er, umm, no. The writer STILL got it wrong.

He only mentioned one (out of about 6-9) case of the MSM (not just Reuters!) accepting and publishing FAKE photographs to (deliberately) spread anti-Israeli propaganda.

It's is a SINGLE STORY, even that story is not right - by limiting the impact and distorting the amount the problem!
11 posted on 08/12/2006 9:09:58 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

On line only, most likely too.


12 posted on 08/12/2006 9:10:12 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

His last paragraphs tell me that at least this writer gets it, to some degree.


13 posted on 08/12/2006 9:11:12 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Interesting that the author of this piece, Tim Rutten, seems to have a reputation as an unapologetic left-wing shill...


14 posted on 08/12/2006 9:14:32 AM PDT by The Electrician ("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Electrician

Apparently smart enough to recognize that he doesn't want the LA Times to get taken down, because heads are going to roll be the time the phony pics and stories are fully exposed.


15 posted on 08/12/2006 9:16:41 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Yep... I have to give him credit where credit is due... Most other far-lefties in the media (for example, Derrick Z. Jackson, Robert Kuttner, David Corn, ad nauseum) are so totalitarian in their outlook that they will dig in their heels and stick to the party line no matter how strong and incontrovertable a truth is staring them in the face.


16 posted on 08/12/2006 9:22:00 AM PDT by The Electrician ("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pissant

This writer for the LA Slimes should apply the same standards he seems to be for re photography to the faux news stories and editorials that appear daily in the LA Slimes to demean our Nation, Warriors, Israel and our President.


17 posted on 08/12/2006 9:22:17 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Electrician

sp: incontrovertable --> incontrovertible


18 posted on 08/12/2006 9:24:08 AM PDT by The Electrician ("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The Electrician

Mental midgets all.


19 posted on 08/12/2006 9:24:19 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

That is asking WAY too much. And this little admission will not save the Slimes from bankruptcy.


20 posted on 08/12/2006 9:25:01 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson