Skip to comments.
Joseph Lieberman on Abortion
Posted on 08/15/2006 8:40:12 AM PDT by supa consrvative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-149 next last
To: nopardons
Better reasons why most Republicans should and will vote for Lieberman.
And all those reasons are in Lamont.
That is why the Republican candidate is now at 6%, from 13% before the Primaries.
Determined not to have the moonbat as their Senator, Repoublivcsn have very sensibly switched to Lieberman.
To: Jameison
Lamont is not my pal. I'm a conservative, and I've been supporting conservative candidates here since '98.
To: Jameison
It's a STUPID move and one which many Conn. GOPers have NOT made!
The ONLY thing that LIEberman has voted for, that President Bush wanted/is for, is the WOT and the war in Iraq; the latter of which he has now repudiated. In all actuality, A Lamont win, verses a LIEberman win, does NOTHING at all to help us or the president. They are now virtually indistinguishable.
The ONLY thing that a LIEberman win really does, is poke Daily Kos, DU and Soros in the eye.
To: supa consrvative
With the GOP candidate who has absolutely no chance of winning. There are only two choices in the Ct Senate race , Lieberman and Lamont. One of them will be Senator.
Better Lieberman who gets it about the WOT than Lamont who is a tool of the extreme Far Left.
104
posted on
08/15/2006 7:03:42 PM PDT
by
Cincinna
(HILLARY & HER HINO WANT TO TAKE OVER YOUR COUNTRY !)
To: Dr. Scarpetta
"Lamont is not my pal. I'm a conservative"
You could fooled me.
You working pretty hard to get him elected.
"and I've been supporting conservative candidates here since '98."
Really?
To: nopardons
"It's a STUPID move and one which many Conn. GOPers have NOT made!"
The stupid move would be to vote the no hope, equally pro-choice Republican and end up getting Lamont.
"GOPers have NOT made!"
They have.
See the polls before the primaries, and the polls after the primaries.
Republicans have switched to Lieberman.
Your man Lamont will lose.
To: nopardons
"The ONLY thing that a LIEberman win really does, is poke Daily Kos, DU and Soros in the eye"
And that is bad how?
Apart from it being a great source of pain to you that is?
To: Jameison
>>
It's going to be Lieberman all the way. He's going to clobber your pal Lamont. <<
Methinks you're the one who's pals with Lamont, the way you've bought his Kool-aid about Lieberman being a good ally of Republicans. Only far left nuts and RINOs could believe Gores running mate is doing the GOP's bidding.
108
posted on
08/15/2006 7:15:20 PM PDT
by
BillyBoy
(ILLINOIS ELECTION "CHOICES:" Rod Bag-o-$hit or Judas Barf Too-Pinka)
To: BillyBoy
"Methinks you're the one who's pals with Lamont"
I am the one working for Lamont's defeat.
You are the guy workimg for Lamont to win.
BIG difference.
To: darkangel82
"3 zots of the same troll in as many days....he must be a glutton for punishment."
Or it's being well paid.
110
posted on
08/15/2006 7:22:50 PM PDT
by
decal
(Different Tagline Tomorrow!)
To: Jameison
"MY" man Lamont?
Listen n00b, Lamont isn't "MY" man,. but neither is Joe LIEberman.
The GOP candidate stinks; however, I won't vote for LIEberman and neither will a LOT of Conservatives/Republicans in Conn.!
And as to polls, polls don't mean a damned thing; the ONLY poll that counts, is the one when people actually vote.
I bet that you don't even live in Conn.!
To: supa consrvative
A Lamont troll here on FreeRepublic!
Who would have guessed?
Your guy is going to get his butt whooped!!
112
posted on
08/15/2006 7:29:48 PM PDT
by
airborne
(Fecal matter is en route to fan! Contact is imminent!)
To: nopardons
"Listen n00b, Lamont isn't "MY" man"
Are you Judas Iscariot then?
To: Jameison
That's right.............tell someone who has been a registered member on FR and who lurker for almost a full year before that, that she is a faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar DU/KOSsick lefty.
Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
You aren't going to last long here, with such an attitude. :-)
Try to follow me, little n00b.....
LIEberman is as far left as Hillary Clinton AND Ned Lamont.
If he wins in November ( and he probably will ), it will NOT be a "win" for our side at all. He will NOT vote for anything that the president or we want. He has recanted his stance on Iraq. That leaves the WOT, a topic which doesn't get a whole lot of bills about it presented to the Senate.
Go join DU; that IS where YOU belong.
To: Jameison
Nobody here has endorsed Lamont no matter how much you'd like to pretend they are. You can whine all your want that people have to support your 95% liberal candidate or else they're somehow helping the 100% liberal candidate, but nobody's buying your agreement.
This is a conservative forum and we do not root for one ultra-socialist's "victory" over another ultra-socialist's "victory". We OPPOSE Liebermont for that seat.
YOU agree with Lamont that a win for socialist Lieberman is a "victory" for President Bush and the GOP. Since it YOU and not me who has bought into Lamont's looney and throughly-discredited talking points, you should just formerly join the RAT party and get it over with.
The pro-Hillary wing of the Dems appriciate your support. The Hilderbeast is currently being attacked over at DU, Daily Kos, etc., for her support of the war but I'm sure a good patriot like you welcomes the "victory" of a fanatically pro-abortion, gun-grabbing, tax and spend commie as long as they vote the "right way" on the WOT. Hillary has anti-war opponents in both the primary and the general election, and Republicans never "win" in New York, so if you welcome Lieberman's victory you'll just luuuuuuuuuuuv Hillary.
As evidenced by Lieberman's vote totals in the primary, roughly 48% of Dems share your "values" and work towards the election of pro-WOT socialists. Joe Lieberman, Hillary Clinton, and Diane Feinstein welcome you into thier ranks.
115
posted on
08/15/2006 7:35:47 PM PDT
by
BillyBoy
(ILLINOIS ELECTION "CHOICES:" Rod Bag-o-$hit or Judas Barf Too-Pinka)
To: Jameison
Do you live in Conn.? I doubt it. So just HOW are you "working for Lamont's defeat"? By berating someone ( me ), who is more Conservative, more knowledgeable, and a far longer member of FR?
You're pathetic !
To: nopardons
Oookaaay.
So you ARE a Judas Iscariot clone, a 5th columnist and a Lamont troll.
Got a message for ya boss: He is going to lose..
Just make sure you pass that on will you, dufus?
To: Jameison; Admin Moderator
Okay troll that's it!
From repeatedly being told, by you, that I am "for Lamont", to being told that I am "Judas Iscariot", because I am going to vote for the CONN. REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL CANDIDATE is beyond the pale.
Go find someone else to try to involve in your senseless flame war. I ain't playing.........................
To: nopardons
"So just HOW are you "working for Lamont's defeat"?"
By sending him some cash?
I sent him some campaign contributions both last week and this morning.
Now that money will help put a nail in ya pal Lamont's coffin. :)
To: nopardons
"From repeatedly being told, by you, that I am "for Lamont", "
And that is wrong how?
You are Laont creature. As is the guy that started this thread.
Why bother to deny it?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-149 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson