To: neocon1984
The other point is that it seems intellectually dishonest to discredit Intelligent Design as an alternative or even enhancement to the theory of evolution. ID isn't a scientific alternative and therefore needs no discrediting.
17 posted on
08/15/2006 1:30:12 PM PDT by
freedumb2003
(The Democrat Party stands for open treason in a time of war.)
To: freedumb2003
ID isn't a scientific alternative and therefore needs no discrediting.
Tell me, is ToE falsifiable? If so, how would we do it? If not, how can you claim that it's a science any more valid than ID?
20 posted on
08/15/2006 1:38:28 PM PDT by
Antoninus
(Public schools are the madrassas of the American Left. --Ann Coulter, Godless)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson