Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats may punish candidates
Yahoo ^

Posted on 08/18/2006 10:25:50 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Democrats may punish candidates

By JIM KUHNHENN, Associated Press Writer 15 minutes ago

Key Democrats on Friday agreed to punish Democratic presidential candidates who campaign in states that violate the party's 2008 primary-caucus schedule.

The move by the national party's rules and bylaws committee seeks to deter candidates from campaigning in renegade states by denying them delegates they may win in that state's nominating contest.

The tough stance is part of a proposed overhaul of party rules to change the decades-long tradition of keeping Iowa and New Hampshire at the starting gate of presidential nomination voting. The plan would insert Nevada between Iowa and New Hampshire and give South Carolina greater influence by scheduling its primary a week after New Hampshire's.

On Saturday, the full Democratic National Committee will vote on the rules changes. The new schedule is designed to bring more Hispanic and African-American voters into the early stages of the nominating process.

Top Democrats, however, fear that a number of states, particularly New Hampshire, will ignore the new voting lineup and choose to hold their nominating contests even earlier. Hoping to put teeth into the new schedule,

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: election2008; electionpresident; elections
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 08/18/2006 10:25:50 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Punitive behavior=party line


2 posted on 08/18/2006 10:32:32 AM PDT by bwteim (bwteim: Begin With The End In Mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; markomalley
Democrats may punish candidates

That will be a welcome chamge from punishing the voters, like they normally do. ;-)

3 posted on 08/18/2006 10:33:34 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Wow. Party above all else. Sounds familiar.


4 posted on 08/18/2006 10:35:43 AM PDT by L98Fiero (Evil is an exact science)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
On Saturday, the full Democratic National Committee will vote on the rules changes. The new schedule is designed to bring more Hispanic and African-American voters into the early stages of the nominating process

Nah, it's designed to give more power to extreme leftist running for office.

5 posted on 08/18/2006 10:36:03 AM PDT by GOPJ (Profiling isn't aimed at demonizing Muslims; it's aimed at saving lives, including Muslims. Stiletto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The party of disenfranchisement.


6 posted on 08/18/2006 10:41:45 AM PDT by webboy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: webboy45

the party of diversity,

AS LONG AS YOU AGREE WITH EVEYTHING WE SAY!!!


7 posted on 08/18/2006 10:44:45 AM PDT by edzo4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

That's good, they'll never win another general election.


8 posted on 08/18/2006 10:45:29 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

NH will never let another primary come before it.


9 posted on 08/18/2006 10:52:09 AM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Stalin would have been proud.


10 posted on 08/18/2006 10:52:51 AM PDT by LIConFem (Just opened a new seafood restaurant in Great Britain, called "Squid Pro Quid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Denying a candidate the nominating delegates from a place as small as New Hampshire is nothing. The momentum and front runner perception gained from winning the NH primary is worth much more than the delegates. As long as cameras and 24/7 cable are covering, the candidates will be there.


11 posted on 08/18/2006 10:52:55 AM PDT by DuxFan4ever (The next rational liberal I meet will be the first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuxFan4ever

They are trying to front load Hillary so that as the primaries go on, she will move further to the right, being a moderate for the general.

Who doesn't see this one coming?

Prediction - the day after the 2006 election, Hillary will apologize for her bad judgement in voting for the war.

The day after the liberal primaries are out of the way, she will start moving right again.


12 posted on 08/18/2006 10:57:36 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz ("If you liked what Liberal Leadership did for Israel, you'll LOVE what it can do for America!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

And Michael Moore and Markos Moulitsas will say absolutely nothing. They know the Clintons run as centrists and govern as liberals.


13 posted on 08/18/2006 11:01:39 AM PDT by DuxFan4ever (The next rational liberal I meet will be the first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Democrats may punish candidates

May? There is some doubt?

14 posted on 08/18/2006 11:03:32 AM PDT by Only1choice____Freedom (I alone, am the chosen one. Because I alone, did the choosing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
The tough stance is part of a proposed overhaul of party rules to change the decades-long tradition of keeping Iowa and New Hampshire at the starting gate of presidential nomination voting. The plan would insert Nevada between Iowa and New Hampshire and give South Carolina greater influence by scheduling its primary a week after New Hampshire's.

Am I missing something here?! Don't the state legislatures pick the dates of the primaries?

15 posted on 08/18/2006 12:15:50 PM PDT by Tamar1973 (Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Democratic National Committee member Donna Brazile addresses members of the DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee during the summer meeting of the DNC in Chicago, Friday, Aug. 18, 2006. The committee voted to alter rules that aim to expand the presence of minorities, gays, lesbians, bisexuals, transgender people and people with disabilities in the party. Looking to broaden primary voting participation, the committee also voted to encourage state parties to provide for Internet voting. Some questioned whether such a step could further disenfranchise the poor and minorities, who have more limited access to computers. 'Because of the ongoing digital divide, we're going to continue to monitor how that's implemented,' said Brazile, a committee member who has been active in DNC efforts to reach out to minorities (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast)


16 posted on 08/18/2006 1:46:37 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ......Help the "Pendleton 8' and families -- http://www.freerepublic.com/~normsrevenge/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Wow and here I thought that just being a democrat was punishment. What more could they do to these poor people?


17 posted on 08/18/2006 1:48:37 PM PDT by engrpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

But...but...Dims are inclusive and tolerant where everyone smokes a joint and hold hands. It's those evil Republicans that are behind this.


18 posted on 08/18/2006 2:22:18 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (404 Page Error Found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
The new schedule is designed to bring more Hispanic and African-American voters into the early stages of the nominating process.

Translation: they want to give an early advantage to their most Leftist candidates

19 posted on 08/18/2006 3:10:09 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the arrogance to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

20 posted on 08/18/2006 3:32:00 PM PDT by Alex1977
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson