Hmmm...
He would have gotten less time had he killed them...
That's screwed up...
If they are going to throw around sexual details...
should be:"Homosexual gunman....
Well, golly. Another instance of lunatic liberalism at work. Sexually assault a transexual and get 206 years; sexually assault a child and get 2.
Is this a puzzle?
Gunman, transsexuals, transgender, consensual sex, rape...
We're talking about a bunch of gay guys, right?
Yes but sexually assult kids and get 30 days. Oh our PC justice system at work. Protect perverts but not children.
Regardless of the specifics here, doesn't a 206-year sentence seem a little, well, overdone? 'Fifty years', yes. 'Life', yes. Even 'death'. But '206 years' just makes the court look ridiculous.
What a bs sentence. These trannies are human debris. You would think he beat up a saint.
Well, he could have gotten 227 years.
Man Who Sexually Assaulted Transsexuals Faces Long Sentence
NBC San Diego - Aug 18 12:01 PM
SAN DIEGO -- A gunman who sexually assaulted two transsexuals and a transvestite last summer could be sentenced to 227 years in prison on Friday afternoon.
In my pot-bellied, middle-aged, surburban naivete, I have to ask - what is the difference between a transvestite and a transsexual? I mean, aren't they all just guys dressed like Barbie?
Strange. I looked for a picture of the pervert, Joel Kuechmann, and found out the judge in the case forbade the press from showing his face.
"A gunman who sexually assaulted two transsexuals and a transvestite last summer was sentenced on Friday afternoon to 206 years to life in prison."
If anyone doubted that liberal judges will make ridiculous rulings in favor of any LGBT, here's your response. The judicial branch is just plain ludicrous when liberals are on the bench. I mean, 206 years? Liberals let convicted cop killers off with less than that! To all the FReepers reading this: Please sit down with any liberals you might know and point out to them that there is a 14th amendment. I know it'll be tough. They'll deny it vehemently at first. I mean, wouldn't YOU if you were just told that everything you've supported and your party's done for the last thirty years is unconstitutional, unethical, and just plain wrong?
I bet if all the members of FR mailed a copy of the Constitution to a liberal, there would be that many less liberals in this country.
BTW, who's writing all these posts that have been removed? (#20,21,22,etc.)