Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Universal health care issue rises anew as session nears end
Sac Bee ^ | 8/25/06 | Dan Walters

Posted on 08/25/2006 10:31:59 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

No one knows exactly how much Californians spend on health care, but it's somewhere between $150 billion and $200 billion a year. ...

Nor do we know exactly how many of California's 37 million residents lack health insurance, but it's somewhere between 6 million and 7 million, one of the nation's largest proportions of medically uninsured, reflecting the state's immense population of illegal immigrants and the multifaceted and diffused nature of its economy.

--snip--

... in the final days of the 2006 legislative session, with the Legislature once again poised to approve a state-operated, universal health care system and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger poised, by all accounts, to veto it.

This year's version is Senate Bill 840, carried by Sen. Sheila Kuehl, D-Santa Monica, that cleared the Senate on a straight party-line, 25-15 vote, and will be passed by the Assembly in the next few days. ...

Advocates claim that with California spending more than $180 billion a year on health care now, a single-payer system would lower overall spending while covering everyone by slicing off expensive layers of health insurer overhead. An estimated 44 percent of the costs would be covered by converting existing governmental programs to the new system, while the remaining 56 percent would come from consumers and/or their employers in lieu of private insurance.

--snip--

Twelve years ago, by a 3-1 margin, California's voters rejected a Canadian-style, universal health care ballot measure that the California Medical Association proposed. Two years ago, albeit by just 1.6 percentage points, they nullified another stab at universal health care, centered on employer mandates, that a very liberal Legislature and former Gov. Gray Davis had enacted.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; healthcare; sb840; session; universal

1 posted on 08/25/2006 10:32:00 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Jamming the issue at Arnold. I hope he doesn't go ahead and sign the darn thing.


2 posted on 08/25/2006 10:36:12 AM PDT by My2Cents (A pirate's life for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
California's 37 million residents

That's a big number. Must include all the citizens of other countries resident in the state.

Maybe next session, the legislature would like to propose paying for all the health care for citizens of other countries that don't actually reside in California. No need to actually cross the border to get the benefits.

3 posted on 08/25/2006 10:44:03 AM PDT by siunevada (If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
multifaceted and diffused nature of its economy
Is this the new euphemism for 'getting paid under the table?'
4 posted on 08/25/2006 10:46:10 AM PDT by DancesWithBolsheviks (Fatigued with the party always being in my backyard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

My experience is that people of all political persuasions go ballistic if you take away their healthcare choices. A total and complete government takeover of the system will take away plenty of choice, along with access, technology, quality, etc.

SB 840 is a pie in sky plan with "free" healthcare funded by: 1. people "assigning" their full Medicare and Medic-aid benefits to the state (good luck) and 2. a massive 14.5% payroll tax. Polls show it is opposed by 75% of voters, even before the negatives are presented.

The legislature is demonstrating how completely out of touch they are with voters on this subject. They truly do not care what the electorate thinks when their interest groups want something. Even the liberal legislators I've spoken with privately acknowledge that this is no solution that they would want for themselves or their families, but they vote for it anyway.


5 posted on 08/25/2006 10:55:36 AM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Font size=5>GET GOVERNMENT OUT OF HEALTHCARE!
6 posted on 08/25/2006 11:19:45 AM PDT by goodnesswins (I think the real problem is islamo-bombia! (Rummyfan))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wiseghy
My view is let it become law and let the Democrats take the fall.

( No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo!)

7 posted on 08/25/2006 1:04:54 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
This law would be:

The largest one time tax increase in history.

The largest intrusion into the everyday, intimate lives of Californians in history.

Represent the largest restructuring of society and politics in the state's history.

Would be enormously destructive to healthcare delivery.

Undoubtedly, there would be a certain satisfaction for some in watching the entire system explode, but many will suffer in the aftermath. Goodness help us if our healthcare system gets hit with a shock crisis during this time.
8 posted on 08/26/2006 9:56:14 AM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson