Posted on 08/27/2006 8:40:51 AM PDT by SFCGeraldRTostensen
Quick, somebody buy a wreath.
Last week marked the passing of multiculturalism as official government doctrine. No longer will opponents of this corrosive and divisive creed be silenced simply by the massed Pavlovian ovine accusation: Racist! Better still, the very people who foisted multiculturalism upon the country are the ones who have decided that it has now outlived its usefulness that is, the political left.
It is amazing how a few by-election shocks and some madmen with explosive backpacks can concentrate the mind. At any rate, British citizens, black and white, can move onwards together towards a sunlit upland of monoculturalism, or maybe zeroculturalism, whatever takes your fancy.
That multiculturalism really is officially dead and buried can be inferred both from Ruth Kellys comments last week and, indeed, from the title of the commission that the government had convened in the wake of the July 7 terrorist attacks last year and to which her observations were made.
In fairness, Kelly, the communities and local government secretary, merely posed the question as to whether the creed had resulted in division and alienation. Have we ended up with some communities living in isolation from each other? she asked. That she was speaking wholly rhetorically is evident from the title of the commission: the Commission for Integration and Cohesion. You dont get either of those things with multiculturalism: they are mutually exclusive.
It has all been a long time coming. Some 22 years ago Ray Honeyford, the previously obscure headmaster of Drummond middle school in Bradford, suggested, in the low-circulation right-wing periodical The Salisbury Review, that his Asian pupils should really be better integrated into British society.
They should learn English, for a start, and a bit of British history and a sense of what the country is about; further, Asian (Muslim) girls should be allowed to learn to swim despite the objections of their parents (who did not like them stripping down even in front of each other). Muslim kids should be treated like every other pupil, in other words.
For these mild contentions, Honeyford was investigated by the government, vilified as a racist by the press, ridiculed every day by leftie demonstrators outside his office and was eventually hounded from his job. He has not worked since.
Perhaps it will be a consolation to him, as he sits idly in his neat, small, semi-detached house in Bury, Lancashire, that he has now been comprehensively outflanked on the far right by a whole bunch of Labour politicians, including at least one minister, and indeed the chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality. Then again, perhaps it wont.
It is impossible to overstate the magnitude of this shift. To give you an example of the lunacy that prevailed back in Honeyfords time: then, the Commission for Racial Equality was happy to instruct Britains journalists that Chinese people were henceforth to be described as black because that, objectively, was their subjective political experience at the hands of the oppressive white hegemony.
I dont suppose they asked the Chinese if they minded this appellation or derogation the question would not even have occurred.
By definition, people who were not-white from Beijing to Barbados were banded together in their oppression and implacable opposition to the prevailing white culture and thus united in their political aspirations. People from Baluchistan, Tobago and Bangladesh were defined solely by their lack of whiteness.
This was, when you think about it, a quintessentially racist assumption, as well as being authoritarian and as the writer Kenan Malik puts it anti-human.
We are not born with a gene that insists we become Muslim or Christian or Rastafarian. We are born, all of us, with a tabula rasa; we are not defined by the nationality or religion or cultural assumptions of our parents. But that was the mindset which, at that time, prevailed.
This is how far we have come in the past year or so. When an ICM poll of Britains Muslims in February this year revealed that some 40% (that is, about 800,000 people) wished to see Islamic law introduced in parts of Britain, the chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality responded by saying that they should therefore pack their bags and clear off. Sir Trevor Phillipss exact words were these: If you want to have laws decided in another way, you have to live somewhere else.
My guess is this: if such a statement had been made by a member of the Tory partys Monday Club in 1984 or, for that matter, 1994 he would have been excoriated and quite probably would have been kicked out of the party. If you dont like it here then go somewhere else was once considered the apogee of racism. People who did not like it here were exhorted to exert their political muscle and change the status quo.
Similarly, Kelly, in her address to the commission that I mentioned earlier, said the following: There are white Britons who do not feel comfortable with change. They see shops and restaurants in their town centres changing. They see their neighbourhoods becoming more diverse.
Quite remarkable stuff, really. And motivated, I suppose, by the Labour partys unhappy experiences in Barking and Dagenham, where the indigenous white working class voted en masse for the British National party at the last council elections. Margaret Hodge, Frank Field and Anne Cryer had earlier warned that resentment was growing swiftly within Labours traditional, but neglected, inner-city and white-flight blue-collar vote. But can you imagine it being uttered by anyone to the left of Ron Atkinson, the former television football pundit, 10 or even five years ago? It has the faint whiff of Enoch Powell about it.
Multiculturalism insisted that communities always changed, were in a permanent state of flux and that if you were white and lived in Oldham or Burnley or Tower Hamlets then you had better get used to the idea quickly.
This was a doublethink because the same latitude was not extended to the host population; while it was accepted that immigrants would naturally wish to band together and preserve their cultural identity, when the white working-class communities made similar protestations, this was regarded, once again, as evidence of an antediluvian racism. Your fish and chip shop is now a halal butcher? Your daughters school now has a majority of Urdu-speaking children? Good! Celebrate the change! Get over it.
One assumes that Kelly would still be telling the white working class to get over it were it not for the BNPs inroads into the Labour vote (where they have candidates who can read without moving their lips over every word) and, of course, the presence within our midst of people who are possessed of such a loathing of our culture, of our very existence, that they wish to kill us all.
It has transpired that this was the final triumph of multiculturalism to create within British society a sizeable body of people who have been assured that it is absolutely fine not to integrate because, if were honest, the prevailing culture is worthless: oppressive and decadent. People who are, as a result, perhaps terminally estranged and who have been relentlessly encouraged in their sense of alienation.
The news that the bombers of July 7 last year and those who allegedly plotted to blow up a whole bunch of aeroplanes were British born apparently came as a shock to the government. Well, it did not come as a shock to those of us who viewed multiculturalism as both dangerous and inherently racist.
It seemed, to people like Honeyford, a simple case of cause and effect. In the end, it is not the mad mullahs at whom we should direct our wrath, but the white liberals who enabled them to prosper. That the creed has now been binned should be a cause for celebration; but dont for a moment expect an admission that they got it wrong in the first place.
Muchos gracias, amigo.
(For English, press one.)
Dos.
Oh, the lefties will ignore this - just the ravings of a rogue country, after all! I'm just flabbergasted that after being wrong on, well, everything from birth to death (and in many cases it's the same thing to lefties), that we continue to follow their warped path hoping for positive results.
Starting with the Dhimmocrat party.
Is it my imagination or was this bit of information (once again) played down by most of the msm?
I love that description! I'm going to have to find some way to work that into a conversation. LOL
This is the essence of political correctness and modern leftist racial politics and it still prevails. It's about whiteness and its elimination, not diversity. That's why the left, which has foamed at the mouth for decades over the Catholic Church or the Church of England, so quietly accepts the growth of Islam in the West, even though Islam is against everything they stand for. The Muslims flooding into the West work to destroy it by their mere presence and that value overrides all other considerations. It's just that in radical Islam they have finally ran into foreigners who are so unpalatable that they threaten to create a backlash from the stupid victims of PC. It's a bit like a gang member who's so brutal to the local extortion victims that the gang leaders have to pull him back before he causes a revolt. The problem is the mass migration of Muslims to Britain, Islamic voters not Islamic bombers, and the crackdown on militants is an attempt to avoid a crackdown on mass migration.
yeah see if you could throw it at your gas station attendant first thing tomorrow morning
Doogle
review
I wonder what it costs to deport someone. Could we bribe people into self deporting by promising to pay them that amount at the border?
Would that by any chance be Mahatma Ghandi?
Don't hold your breath. I may take longer then we'd like.
Great thougnts from a, no doubt, great mind!
What's that?
the guy who takes your money
Doogle
"By definition, people who were not-white from Beijing to Barbados were banded together in their oppression and implacable opposition to the prevailing white culture and thus united in their political aspirations. People from Baluchistan, Tobago and Bangladesh were defined solely by their lack of whiteness.
This is the essence of political correctness and modern leftist racial politics and it still prevails. It's about whiteness and its elimination, not diversity. That's why the left, which has foamed at the mouth for decades over the Catholic Church or the Church of England, so quietly accepts the growth of Islam in the West, even though Islam is against everything they stand for. The Muslims flooding into the West work to destroy it by their mere presence and that value overrides all other considerations. It's just that in radical Islam they have finally ran into foreigners who are so unpalatable that they threaten to create a backlash from the stupid victims of PC. It's a bit like a gang member who's so brutal to the local extortion victims that the gang leaders have to pull him back before he causes a revolt. The problem is the mass migration of Muslims to Britain, Islamic voters not Islamic bombers, and the crackdown on militants is an attempt to avoid a crackdown on mass migration."
Bingo!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.