To: PatrickHenry
Oh, and by the way, any valid points that the author had about the Darwin-Hitler link (which, I agree, is way too much of a stretch) went right out the window when he used the "Taliban" reference to refer to Coral Ridge. Coral Ridge Ministries doesn't go around chopping off hands or executing those that disagree with them.
Basically, using the "Taliban" reference when referring to conservative Christians should be a corollary to Godwin's Law--invoke it, you automatically lose the argument. He did, and he lost.
}:-)4
10 posted on
08/28/2006 6:39:53 AM PDT by
Moose4
(Dirka dirka Mohammed jihad.)
To: Moose4
Bingo. That should end this pathetically ignorant thread right there.
15 posted on
08/28/2006 6:41:18 AM PDT by
Skooz
(Chastity prays for me, piety sings...Modesty hides my thighs in her wings...)
To: Moose4
Basically, using the "Taliban" reference when referring to conservative Christians should be a corollary to Godwin's Law--invoke it, you automatically lose the argument. He did, and he lost.
Since Islamofascism is a direct descendant of Nazism, it seems to me that you may not even need a corrolary, since they are essentially the same anyway.
22 posted on
08/28/2006 6:44:53 AM PDT by
JamesP81
("Never let your schooling interfere with your education" --Mark Twain)
To: Moose4
Basically, using the "Taliban" reference when referring to conservative Christians should be a corollary to Godwin's Law--invoke it, you automatically lose the argument. He did, and he lost. Especially when you precede that reference with the word, "thus."
Beware of this liberal substitute for reasoned thought.
124 posted on
08/28/2006 8:13:11 AM PDT by
HIDEK6
To: Moose4
Oh, and by the way, any valid points that the author had about the Darwin-Hitler link (which, I agree, is way too much of a stretch) went right out the window when he used the "Taliban" reference to refer to Coral Ridge.
I am not sure that I can accept your logic. You are saying that if the author of this article had not referred to those he criticized as "Taliban" then Darwin would not be responsible for Hitler, but because the author of the article did use the term "Taliban" to describe a Christian group, Darwin is to blame for the Holocaust?
131 posted on
08/28/2006 8:18:41 AM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Moose4
Oh, and by the way, any valid points that the author had about the Darwin-Hitler link (which, I agree, is way too much of a stretch) went right out the window when he used the "Taliban" reference to refer to Coral Ridge. Coral Ridge Ministries doesn't go around chopping off hands or executing those that disagree with them.
Basically, using the "Taliban" reference when referring to conservative Christians should be a corollary to Godwin's Law--invoke it, you automatically lose the argument. He did, and he lost.
Bingo.
You should make a motion to add to the FReeper Lexicon (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1689962/posts) the entry
Brummett's Law as described above.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson