Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why persecute college professors for heresy?
The Birmingham News ^ | Sunday, August 27, 2006 | DAVID MCGRATH

Posted on 08/29/2006 7:34:58 AM PDT by Condor 63

The U.S. interstate highway system was built to give military tanks easy access to the inner cities in order to put down the expected revolution by black militants.

The technocrats who died in the Twin Towers were the equivalent of little Adolph Eichmans.

The United States government orchestrated the 9/11 attacks for its own benefit.

The above three statements were all theories proffered by college professors: the first at Chicago State University in 1969, and the second by professor Ward Churchill of the University of Colorado in 2001. The third and most recent is by professor Kenneth Barrett at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, whose views and re-hiring have been condemned by politicians and pundits, from Wisconsin's Gov. Jim Doyle to Fox TV's Bill O'Reilly.

Should college professors be fired for expressing radical views?

(Excerpt) Read more at al.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: academia; americahaters; bias; campuscommies; campusradicals; highereducation; professors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Alouette

All the jobs in beverage delivery were filled up. :P


41 posted on 08/29/2006 8:23:05 AM PDT by BelegStrongbow (www.stjosephssanford.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
Yes, Dwight Eisenhower in 1956, when the Interstate Highway Act was passed, was really worrying about race riots in inner cities.

Perhaps this urban legend was created because one justification for the interstate highway system was to help mobility of military units in case of an invasion of the continental United States. The designed were such that linear lengths of the interstate could also be used a fighter jet runways. Some liberal kook then took this legitimate need (national defense) and warped it into some jack-boot thug tin foil hat conspiracy theory still being spouted off by hygenically challenege hippie professors.

42 posted on 08/29/2006 8:27:07 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Heresy is a threatening independent thought. And the "world at large" would never encourage it: oxymoronic.

Independent thought is of course to be encouraged, even more so if it can be openly criticized and tested. That's not happening in college classrooms, I bet. Treason is always "independent"- doesn't mean it ain't treason- or moronic.


43 posted on 08/29/2006 8:28:17 AM PDT by Anselma (Visualize whirled peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Condor 63
Why persecute college professors for heresy?

No need, lol.
Just arrest college professors at the airport as they return from their boy-sex trips to Thailand and Brazil.

44 posted on 08/29/2006 8:29:12 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

"More of them are barely qualified ..."

Their "qualifications" include acquaintance with certian PC people, spewing certain catch-phrases, and cherishing a certain bleak, dark outlook on Western civilization. Oh yeah.


45 posted on 08/29/2006 8:31:50 AM PDT by Anselma (Visualize whirled peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Anselma
the "world at large" would never encourage it:

The world at large is not discouraging it either since the world at large is heretical to its core.

46 posted on 08/29/2006 8:33:30 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

"... Kanye West reproduced by fission"

Tee, hee. Are you meaning "con-fusion"?


47 posted on 08/29/2006 8:34:46 AM PDT by Anselma (Visualize whirled peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
I saw the Leperchaun interviewing Barrett and the professor was convincingly stupid enough not to be able to tell the difference between him teaching moonbat theory on the taxpayers dime and O'Reilly expressing the views of a pundit on a privately run news commentary show on Fox.

The guy that wrote this article is evidently just as stupid in that he can not distinguish between Noam Chomsky, the brilliant linguist and Noam Chomsky, the idiot political pundit.

48 posted on 08/29/2006 8:35:30 AM PDT by Vigilanteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

You wrote: "The world at large is not discouraging it either since the world at large is heretical to its core."


The "world at large" is not monolithic! But the phrase does imply normalcy, averageness, "main stream". That is the opposite of "heretical". A "heresy" challenges accepted opinion/faith/thought. Cheezzzzz. Whoa there, pilgrim, I say in a nice way.


49 posted on 08/29/2006 8:43:16 AM PDT by Anselma (Visualize whirled peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Condor 63

David Horowitz made a good point on Hannity and Colmes show that regardless how stupid statements like Churchills are, there should be a counterbalance alternative veiwpoint to the left wing crap on campus instead of this dominant ONLY way of looking at life.In that case jerks like Churchill wouldn't have to be fired because there would be conservative professors to offer debate on issues !!!


50 posted on 08/29/2006 8:43:20 AM PDT by Obie Wan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

You would think that a professor of Lingistics would be not only able, but eager, to write in simple, comprehensible sentences. Chomsky uses complexity as a crutch. He's a friggin fonie, pardon my frenshhh.


51 posted on 08/29/2006 8:51:10 AM PDT by Anselma (Visualize whirled peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Anselma

Every place I look, everybody I see, nobody is happy with the way things are being done and everybody wants to do it all different and no two the same. This is not only happening with politicians bombarding us with their campaign messages right now, but with every person working for a living. There is something wrong with everything and everybody has a better idea. Of the seven billion people on earth no more than a handful thinks everything is just fine. There might be a median, but nobody I know resides on that median. You can't talk to anybody without hearing some kind of challenge to the mainstream. That is the true mainstream and it is made of atomic heresy.


52 posted on 08/29/2006 8:53:23 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Obie Wan

"In that case jerks like Churchill wouldn't have to be fired because there would be conservative professors to offer debate on issues !!!"


You don't mean "diversity" do you??? -Diversity of the only thing that really matters: opinion/research/thought???

Bless you. And D. Horowitz (enlightened ex-Rampartsman, don't cha know).

Requiring equal exposure and shining the light on those campus commie clowns are not going to be a) thorough and far-reaching enough and b) not quick enough. I say: cut the public trough feeding frenzie. If the profs find they must compete for student dollars in a public marketplace, with no tenure, and no government dollars to shore them up, they'll shape up, and fast. Serve 'em right, she said, punnily.


53 posted on 08/29/2006 9:00:06 AM PDT by Anselma (Visualize whirled peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RubyCosmos
However, my astronomy professor once told us there was a big blue dragon living on the moon. So I'm with ya.

I've had electrical engineering professors state that electronics work based on magic smoke. As evidence they stated that if you let all the smoke out of a piece of electrical equipment it won't work any more.

54 posted on 08/29/2006 9:01:20 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (UN Security Council resolution 1701: I believe it is ceasefire for our time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Has too much information got you down? Relax. Different opinions do not portend "heresy", necessarily or normally.


55 posted on 08/29/2006 9:05:05 AM PDT by Anselma (Visualize whirled peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Stanley Fish is brilliant.

I'll have to take your word for that. Heard him speak once on a trip back East. It was a little less than impressive. I do understand he's moved past the weird fixation on postmodernism/poststructuralism that made the evening such a pain in the butt, which, I grant you, is more than I can say for his colleagues.

56 posted on 08/29/2006 9:08:30 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
Yes, Dwight Eisenhower in 1956, when the Interstate Highway Act was passed, was really worrying about race riots in inner cities.

What a visionary!!!

LOL! Just to be safe: /sarcasm

57 posted on 08/29/2006 9:10:41 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (Closing in on 3000 posts, of which maybe 50 were worthwhile!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
His stuff on Milton is first rate. A lot of these fly by night academics never had a legitimate subject to begin with. Fish's work on Milton work is unassailable. And his essays on free speech are fascinating as well
58 posted on 08/29/2006 9:10:59 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Anselma

Is heresy one of those politically charged words like Fascist! or Racist! or Genocide! ? Maybe inside a dogmatic institution such as islamism everybody else is a heretic but in the world at large it is just a curiosity.


59 posted on 08/29/2006 9:16:23 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Condor 63
Should college professors be fired for expressing radical views?

If they're doing it in class on my dime, then yes.

If I spent my day at work doing anything other than my job (FReeping aside on my breaks), I would be fired. Why shouldn't they?

60 posted on 08/29/2006 9:22:35 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson