Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SAT Scores See Biggest Decline Since 1975
Wall Street Journal ^ | 30 August 2006 | ROBERT TOMSHO

Posted on 08/30/2006 2:42:34 PM PDT by shrinkermd

SAT Scores See Biggest Decline Since 1975

The high-school class of 2006 suffered the biggest drop in SAT scores in more than three decades -- a development that may raise more questions about the recently revamped exam than the students who took it.

The College Board, the New York nonprofit that gives the admissions test, says scores in critical reading -- formerly known as verbal -- fell by five points to 503, out of 800 possible points. Math scores slipped two points, to 518, also out of 800 points. The combined decrease of seven points is the biggest since 1975, when there was a 16-point drop. Overall, math scores had been rising in the past decade, while reading has been relatively flat; there have been occasional small declines in either or both scores.

The scores announced yesterday were the first to fully reflect the revised test introduced in March 2005. Along with a writing section that consists of an essay and multiple-choice questions, the new test added higher-level algebra and did away with analogy questions on the reading section. Requiring nearly four hours to complete, the test has a possible score of 2,400 points, up from 1,600 points with the old 2½-hour test.

Scores on the new writing tests averaged 497 points out of 800, with females averaging 502, 11 points higher than males.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: act; college; sat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last
To: RKV

You do know, Bill Shockley got in trouble for saying as much (and more).


81 posted on 08/30/2006 7:47:25 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
Yep - a lot of folks have an extraordinary amount emotionally invested in a number. Whether its SAT score, a GPA, an LSAT score, an entry-level salary, whatever.

A lot of people find it difficult to cope with the concept that the smartest people aren't the most successful in life: career, financial, relationships, many things.
82 posted on 08/30/2006 7:49:29 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
I didn't suggest the data wasn't reliable, I just said some conclusions could be more dubious than others, and offered some other conclusions.

It's reasonable to conclude from that graph, for example, that asians and whites spend more time, money, and resources to preparing for the exams rather than hispanics or blacks.

Every test just measures what is being tested. Any test with a consistent methodology can be prepped for. If a test has a notable bias, that's a good thing: train to handle the bias. If you can isolate it, that goes a long way towards cracking it.

It helps when you think of these things in 3-D, not 2-D. Or heaven forbid, 1-D.
83 posted on 08/30/2006 7:53:24 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

That what I thought too and doesn't some special elite colleges give disadvantage kids extra points?


84 posted on 08/30/2006 7:54:26 PM PDT by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

That's true.


85 posted on 08/30/2006 7:55:37 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Beaverton

What's even more telling is that the 1995 SAT Score chart only goes up to 1100. Why did they not include the full range? Perhaps a little problem with the bell curve?


86 posted on 08/30/2006 8:03:06 PM PDT by Domestic Church (AMDG...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV
Every test just measures what is being tested. Any test with a consistent methodology can be prepped for. If a test has a notable bias, that's a good thing: train to handle the bias. If you can isolate it, that goes a long way towards cracking it.

Bump.

87 posted on 08/30/2006 9:06:19 PM PDT by NoCurrentFreeperByThatName
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: NoCurrentFreeperByThatName

Just the damn truth! And "I am not a number! I am a free man!" ;-)


88 posted on 08/30/2006 9:09:56 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

You're absolutly correct. I took the SAT's in the late 60's, combined score somewhere around 700. Now I have two Master's Degrees. The SAT measures your ability to take tests, the ASVAB measures your ability to learn something.


89 posted on 08/30/2006 9:39:54 PM PDT by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

The SAT (on the 1600 scale) was recentered about 10 years ago. So anyone who familiarized themselves with the 1600 score in the last 10 years (before the move to the higher score) should add about 100 points to any score reported on that scale from before. So Bush would be 1306. 1500+ would be 1600, etc.


90 posted on 08/31/2006 2:49:32 PM PDT by College Repub (Windex, apply directly to the windows. Butter, apply directly to the toast. KY Jelly, apply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
One would think that the bright parents [those with graduate degrees, especially the Asians with their cultural premium on learning] would get their progeny into 1450-1600 SAT range

Isn't intelligence mostly inherited from the woman's side? Maybe those doctors need to stop spawning with trophy wives and get themselves some smart women. For the good of the country.

91 posted on 09/01/2006 2:54:18 PM PDT by ReagansShinyHair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ReagansShinyHair
Well, I've read that the IQ [or rather Spearman's g] is about 70-80% heritable, but I do not remember reading anything re which side it is mostly inherited from. Hopefully in a few decades it will be found out - which genes, and when, and how.
92 posted on 09/01/2006 3:26:14 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

Here's a link:
http://www.flatrock.org.nz/topics/men/thank_mom_for_brains.htm

I guess you never know when "researchers" will discover that they were mistaken, though.


93 posted on 09/01/2006 5:38:33 PM PDT by ReagansShinyHair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson