Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SF Rampage Suspect Misses Arraignment
NBC11 ^ | August 31, 2006

Posted on 08/31/2006 8:08:56 PM PDT by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Lurker

DWI Driving while Islamic


21 posted on 08/31/2006 10:33:27 PM PDT by dennisw (Confucius say man who go through turnstile sideways going to Bangkok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
LA replies:

 

What you say about motive is fascinating. As has often been said at VFR, a person’s subjective motive for taking a particular political position matters less than the fact that he takes that position. The position has its own structure and dynamic, and will lead in a certain direction and play a certain part in the politics of the time, regardless of what the person may subjectively feel is his motive and reason for having that position. It is liberalism that fosters the incorrect emphasis on a person’s subjective desire and choice rather than on objective reality. This is seen in the transformation of criminal law for example. In the past, motive was a minor or non-existent factor in determining guilt and punishment; the fact that a person had committed a certain act was what mattered, not what he was thinking about it. But now the motive has become all. All we care about is why the person, the choosing entity, chose to do this thing, not the fact that he did it. While examination of motive obviously has a legitimate place in criminal law and in moral thought, we have carried the emphasis on it way too far.

The same applies to politics, or for that matter to jihad. The specific motivations that drive a particular Muslim to go on a rampage against non-Muslims are less important than the fact that he is a Muslim who is attacking non-Muslims, and thus playing a part in the general jihad. Some Muslims belong to terrorist organizations and are consciously waging jihad. Others just get suddenly “angry” at Britain or at Jews for their unfairness to Muslims and decide to kill some Britons or Jews. Others have “mental problems” and go on a rampage against non-Muslims. Why does one express his “mental problems” by going on a rampage against non-Muslims? Because he’s a Muslim. That’s what matters. The objective meaning of his act is that he is a Muslim seeking to mass murder non-Muslims.

People are different, and have a wide range of motivations for their actions. But, though liberalism denies it, people also fall into broad classes that matter socially and politically. The class “Muslim” matters.

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/006317.html

 

 


22 posted on 08/31/2006 10:35:39 PM PDT by dennisw (Confucius say man who go through turnstile sideways going to Bangkok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Just shoot the POS.

He will act insane as dictated by "Allah", and escape the destiny otherwise planned for him by the infidels.

23 posted on 08/31/2006 11:51:34 PM PDT by Candor7 (Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson